World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
20616
World Ranking
2393
National Ranking
217

Jochen B. Fiebach publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen B. Fiebach sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 378 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jochen B. Fiebach D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen B. Fiebach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jochen B. Fiebach is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research activity is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on multiple subfields including Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's research work spans several main topics related to cerebrovascular health and stroke treatment. These topics include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Jochen B. Fiebach's publication record demonstrates a consistent focus on stroke and neuroimaging research. Some of the recent notable papers include:

  • "Opening the black box of artificial intelligence for clinical decision support: A study predicting stroke outcome," 2020, published in PLoS ONE
  • "Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data," 2020, published in The Lancet
  • "On the usage of average Hausdorff distance for segmentation performance assessment: hidden error when used for ranking," 2021, published in European Radiology Experimental
  • "BRAVE-NET: Fully Automated Arterial Brain Vessel Segmentation in Patients With Cerebrovascular Disease," 2020, published in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
  • "Imaging Markers of Brain Frailty and Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke," 2021, published in Stroke

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Jochen B. Fiebach include:

  • Matthias Endres
  • Ivana Galinović
  • Robin Lemmens
  • Vincent Thijs
  • Keith W. Muir

The venues where the scientist has most commonly published research are:

  • Stroke
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • International Journal of Stroke
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Stroke Journal

These venues align closely with the scientist's research interests in cerebrovascular diseases and stroke management. The collaboration network and publication outlets reinforce the research focus on clinical and imaging aspects of stroke, cerebral vascular conditions, and neurological recovery processes.

Best Publications

  • MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

    Götz Thomalla;Claus Z. Simonsen;Florent Boutitie;Grethe Andersen

  • Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    Werner Hacke;Anthony J Furlan;Yasir Al-Rawi;Antoni Davalos

  • DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study

    Götz Thomalla;Bastian Cheng;Martin Ebinger;Qing Hao

  • CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

    J.B. Fiebach;P.D. Schellinger;O. Jansen;M. Meyer

  • Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging

    Jochen B. Fiebach;Peter D. Schellinger;Achim Gass;Thomas Kucinski

  • Effect of the Use of Ambulance-Based Thrombolysis on Time to Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Martin Ebinger;Benjamin Winter;Matthias Wendt;Joachim E Weber

  • A Standardized MRI Stroke Protocol: Comparison with CT in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Peter D. Schellinger;Olav Jansen;Jochen B. Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis on MRI Parameters and Functional Outcome in Acute Stroke <6 Hours

    J. Röther;P.D. Schellinger;A. Gass;M. Siebler

  • Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status.

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Transient Ischemic Attacks Before Ischemic Stroke: Preconditioning the Human Brain? A Multicenter Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Susanne Wegener;Barbara Gottschalk;Verica Jovanovic;René Knab

  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II

    Max Wintermark;Gregory W. Albers;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Long-Chain Omega-3 Fatty Acids Improve Brain Function and Structure in Older Adults

    A. Veronica Witte;A. Veronica Witte;Lucia Kerti;Henrike M. Hermannstädter;Jochen B. Fiebach

  • Comparison of Perfusion Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Source Images With Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke of Less Than 6 Hours’ Duration

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Ernst Klotz;Kai Kallenberg

  • Outcome and Symptomatic Bleeding Complications of Intravenous Thrombolysis Within 6 Hours in MRI-Selected Stroke Patients Comparison of a German Multicenter Study With the Pooled Data of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS tPA Trials

    Götz Thomalla;Christian Schwark;Jan Sobesky;Erich Bluhmki

  • Stroke MRI in intracerebral hemorrhage: is there a perihemorrhagic penumbra?

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Katrin Hoffmann;Kristina Becker

  • Comparison of CT and CT Angiography Source Images With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke Within 6 Hours After Onset

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Sabine Heiland

  • Early recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke saves tissue at risk defined by MRI

    Olav Jansen;Peter Schellinger;Jochen Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Bapineuzumab for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in two global, randomized, phase 3 trials.

    Rik Vandenberghe;Juha O. Rinne;Mercè Boada;Sadao Katayama

  • Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Olav Jansen;Peter A. Ringleb

  • MRI versus CT-based thrombolysis treatment within and beyond the 3 h time window after stroke onset: a cohort study

    Martin Köhrmann;Martin Köhrmann;Eric Jüttler;Jochen B Fiebach;Jochen B Fiebach;Hagen B Huttner;Hagen B Huttner

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter D. Schellinger
Peter D. Schellinger Ruhr University Bochum
Matthias Endres
Matthias Endres Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Christian Gerloff
Christian Gerloff University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Götz Thomalla
Götz Thomalla Universität Hamburg
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University
Ulrike Grittner
Ulrike Grittner Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Daniel S. Margulies
Daniel S. Margulies Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to a diverse array of online degree and certification opportunities. For those who want to boost their credentials or transition into a specialized role quickly, check out some of the best online certificate programs that can lead to high-paying positions in healthcare and education-related fields.

The flexibility of online classes for adults means you can advance your studies while balancing work and family commitments. Many programs are designed with working professionals in mind, offering asynchronous learning and accelerated formats.

For those interested in mental health, behavioral science, or social care, pursuing graduate-level training like a Master of Social Work can be more affordable with the cheapest msw programs online. These programs offer practical skills for roles in therapy, counseling, and neurorehabilitation.

Additionally, those aiming for specialized credentials in behavioral analysis may consider an online option for bcba certification. This pathway is especially valuable for careers working with autism spectrum disorders or other developmental conditions.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen B. Fiebach

Trending Scientists