World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9886 9274 5087 4698 354 47225

Steven Warach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven Warach between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven Warach published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2012. 42 of the 404 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2012. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 13 publications
1981 2025

404 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven Warach: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 3
1994 2
1995 11
1996 8
1997 11
1998 10
1999 7
2000 11
2001 10
2002 9
2003 29
2004 17
2005 11
2006 7
2007 11
2008 10
2009 8
2010 7
2011 8
2012 30
2013 19
2014 11
2015 9
2016 9
2017 11
2018 14
2019 13
2020 11
2021 13
2022 11
2023 14
2024 29
2025 13
Total 404
Download as CSV

Steven Warach publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Warach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 354 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 354
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven Warach D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Warach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven Warach is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of medicine, with particular attention to epidemiology, neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, rehabilitation, and internal medicine.

The scientist's work has notably concentrated on topics related to acute ischemic stroke management. Other main areas of study include cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, and intracranial aneurysms treatment and complications.

Frequent collaborators of Steven Warach include Sean I. Savitz, Mark P. Goldberg, Stephen M. Davis, Adrienne N. Dula, and Timothy Kleinig. These coauthors have contributed to numerous research efforts alongside Warach, reflecting a wide network of scientific cooperation.

The scientist has published extensively in several well-known medical journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • Neurology
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Steven Warach are:

  • "Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Tenecteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke," 2020, Stroke
  • "Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data," 2020, The Lancet
  • "Deep learning-based detection and segmentation of diffusion abnormalities in acute ischemic stroke," 2021, Communications Medicine
  • "Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke Across Ischemic Injury and Penumbra Profiles," 2024, JAMA

Steven Warach's scientific output demonstrates a significant focus on stroke-related research, including interventions, imaging, and treatment approaches. The volume and scope of publications illustrate a sustained engagement with clinical research and medical advancements in cerebrovascular diseases.

Best Publications

  • Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation

    Steven M. Greenberg;Meike W. Vernooij;Charlotte Cordonnier;Anand Viswanathan

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (2)

    Edelman Rr;Warach S

  • Trial Design and Reporting Standards for Intra-Arterial Cerebral Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Randall T. Higashida;Anthony J. Furlan;Heidi Roberts;Thomas Tomsick

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling

    Richard B. Buxton;Richard B. Buxton;Lawrence R. Frank;Eric C. Wong;Bettina Siewert

  • Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison

    Julio A Chalela;Chelsea S Kidwell;Lauren M Nentwich;Marie Luby

  • The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): A Phase II MRI-Based 9-Hour Window Acute Stroke Thrombolysis Trial With Intravenous Desmoteplase

    Werner Hacke;Greg Albers;Yasir Al-Rawi;Julien Bogousslavsky

  • Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging

    Steven Warach;Jochen Gaa;Bettina Siewert;Piotr Wielopolski

  • Fast magnetic resonance diffusion‐weighted imaging of acute human stroke

    S. Warach;D. Chien;W. Li;M. Ronthal

  • Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Julio A. Chalela;Jeffrey L. Saver;Sidney Starkman

  • Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency.

    Robert R. Edelman;Bettina Siewert;Bettina Siewert;David G. Darby;Venketasen Thangaraj

  • MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study.

    Maarten G. Lansberg;Matus Straka;Stephanie Kemp;Michael Mlynash

  • Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    Werner Hacke;Anthony J Furlan;Yasir Al-Rawi;Antoni Davalos

  • Open-channel block of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) responses by memantine: therapeutic advantage against NMDA receptor-mediated neurotoxicity

    Hueisheng Vincent Chen;J. W. Pellegrini;S. K. Aggarwal;S. Z. Lei

  • Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS) Evidence of Safety and Efficacy 3 to 9 Hours After Stroke Onset

    Anthony J. Furlan;Dirk Eyding;Gregory W. Albers;Yasir Al-Rawi

  • Enlargement of human cerebral ischemic lesion volumes measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

    Alison E. Baird;Andrew Benfield;Gottfried Schlaug;Bettina Siewert

  • Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke

    G. Schlaug;B. Siewert;A. Benfield;R. R. Edelman

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Stroke

    Alison E. Baird;Steven Warach

  • Clinical experience with diffusion-weighted MR in patients with acute stroke.

    Karl Olof Lövblad;Hans Joachim Laubach;Alison E. Baird;François Curtin

  • Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis

    Steven Warach;John F. Dashe;Robert R. Edelman

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert R. Edelman
Robert R. Edelman Northwestern University
Chelsea S. Kidwell
Chelsea S. Kidwell University of Arizona
Max Wintermark
Max Wintermark Stanford University
Marc Fisher
Marc Fisher Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Gottfried Schlaug
Gottfried Schlaug University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University
Ona Wu
Ona Wu Harvard University
Jochen B. Fiebach
Jochen B. Fiebach Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine and healthcare but seeking flexible alternatives to traditional medical school, online degrees offer valuable options. Many begin their journey by enrolling in online adn programs for non nurses, which provide a fast track into the nursing field and a solid foundation for further studies.

Earning a bachelor’s degree is another important step. Aspiring nurses often choose the cheapest bsn programs to advance their qualifications in a cost-effective way. Additionally, those with non-nursing backgrounds may consider direct entry msn programs online to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles without holding a BSN first.

For those aiming at leadership, research, or academic positions, pursuing phd in nursing online programs can open the door to higher-level opportunities. With flexible scheduling and a range of specializations, these online pathways make healthcare careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Warach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles