World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
27385
World Ranking
16992
National Ranking
8522

Glen S. Markowitz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen S. Markowitz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 252 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glen S. Markowitz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen S. Markowitz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glen S. Markowitz is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on subfields including Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Hematology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Recent publications by Glen S. Markowitz include:

  • "A molecular single-cell lung atlas of lethal COVID-19" (2021) published in Nature
  • "Kidney Biopsy Findings in Patients with COVID-19" (2020) published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Postmortem Kidney Pathology Findings in Patients with COVID-19" (2020) published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy: proposal for a novel classification" (2023) published in Kidney International
  • "Immunotactoid glomerulopathy is a rare entity with monoclonal and polyclonal variants" (2020) published in Kidney International

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Glen S. Markowitz include:

  • Vivette D. D'Agati
  • Dominick Santoriello
  • Satoru Kudose
  • Ibrahim Batal
  • Michael B. Stokes

Glen S. Markowitz's publications appear frequently in several venues, reflecting the focus of their research:

  • Kidney International Reports
  • Kidney International
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • Obesity-related glomerulopathy: an emerging epidemic.

    Neeraja Kambham;Glen S. Markowitz;Anthony M. Valeri;Julie Lin

  • Endocytic delivery of lipocalin-siderophore-iron complex rescues the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury

    Kiyoshi Mori;H. Thomas Lee;Dana Rapoport;Ian R. Drexler

  • RAGE drives the development of glomerulosclerosis and implicates podocyte activation in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.

    Thoralf M. Wendt;Nozomu Tanji;Jiancheng Guo;Thomas R. Kislinger

  • A molecular single-cell lung atlas of lethal COVID-19.

    Johannes C. Melms;Jana Biermann;Huachao Huang;Yiping Wang

  • Somatic Inactivation of Pkd2 Results in Polycystic Kidney Disease

    Guanqing Wu;Vivette D'Agati;Yiqiang Cai;Glen Markowitz

  • Expression of Advanced Glycation End Products and Their Cellular Receptor RAGE in Diabetic Nephropathy and Nondiabetic Renal Disease

    Nozomu Tanji;Glen S. Markowitz;Caifeng Fu;Thomas Kislinger

  • Collapsing Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Following Treatment with High-Dose Pamidronate

    Glen S. Markowitz;Gerald B. Appel;Paul L. Fine;Andrew Z. Fenves

  • Renal monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease : The disease spectrum

    Julie Lin;Glen S. Markowitz;Anthony M. Valeri;Neeraja Kambham

  • Adult Minimal-Change Disease: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes

    Meryl Waldman;R. John Crew;Anthony Valeri;Joshua Busch

  • Acute Phosphate Nephropathy following Oral Sodium Phosphate Bowel Purgative: An Underrecognized Cause of Chronic Renal Failure

    Glen S. Markowitz;M. Barry Stokes;Jai Radhakrishnan;Vivette D. D’Agati

  • Toxic acute tubular necrosis following treatment with zoledronate (Zometa)

    Glen S. Markowitz;Paul L. Fine;Jay I. Stack;Cheryl L. Kunis

  • The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group.

    Nelson Leung;Frank Bridoux;Vecihi Batuman;Aristeidis Chaidos

  • Lithium Nephrotoxicity A Progressive Combined Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Nephropathy

    Glen S. Markowitz;Jai Radhakrishnan;Neeraja Kambham;Anthony M. Valeri

  • Cardiac defects and renal failure in mice with targeted mutations in Pkd2.

    Guanqing Wu;G. S. Markowitz;Li Li;V. D. D'agati

  • Eculizumab for Dense Deposit Disease and C3 Glomerulonephritis

    Andrew S. Bomback;Richard J. Smith;Gaetano R. Barile;Yuzhou Zhang

  • Proliferative Glomerulonephritis with Monoclonal IgG Deposits

    Samih H. Nasr;Anjali Satoskar;Glen S. Markowitz;Anthony M. Valeri

  • Fibrillary and immunotactoid glomerulonephritis: Distinct entities with different clinical and pathologic features

    Jordan L. Rosenstock;Glen S. Markowitz;Anthony M. Valeri;Giuseppe Sacchi

  • Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis

    Mark A. Perazella;Glen S. Markowitz

  • Kidney Biopsy Findings in Patients with COVID-19.

    Satoru Kudose;Ibrahim Batal;Dominick Santoriello;Katherine Xu

  • Tenofovir nephrotoxicity: acute tubular necrosis with distinctive clinical, pathological, and mitochondrial abnormalities

    Leal C. Herlitz;Sumit Mohan;Michael B. Stokes;Jai Radhakrishnan

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivette D. D'Agati
Vivette D. D'Agati Columbia University
Samih H. Nasr
Samih H. Nasr Mayo Clinic
Gerald B. Appel
Gerald B. Appel Columbia University
Stefan Somlo
Stefan Somlo Yale University
Nicole Suciu-Foca
Nicole Suciu-Foca Columbia University
Sanjeev Sethi
Sanjeev Sethi Mayo Clinic
Mark A. Perazella
Mark A. Perazella Yale University
Robert B. Colvin
Robert B. Colvin Harvard University
Govind Bhagat
Govind Bhagat Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. There are many alternative pathways, especially online, that can lead to rewarding roles in medicine and patient care. For instance, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online allow those with a non-nursing background to quickly earn a master’s and start working as registered nurses.

If you are looking for more accessible options, the easiest rn program to get into may be the right choice, especially if you prefer minimizing admission complexity. Many programs cater to different schedules and educational backgrounds, opening doors for various aspiring professionals.

Those interested in the administrative side of medicine may prefer enrolling in medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These choices support a career in healthcare supporting roles, often from the comfort of home and with less time commitment.

Finally, if standardized tests are a concern, students can seek nursing schools where you don’t have to worry about entrance exams. Discover whether do you have to take a teas test for lpn is a requirement at your school of choice, and explore routes that focus on holistic or alternative admissions.

Best Scientists Citing Glen S. Markowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles