World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
18035
World Ranking
4702
National Ranking
2184

Robert T. Collins publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert T. Collins sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert T. Collins D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert T. Collins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert T. Collins is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily in engineering, computer science, and medicine, with a focus on several interconnected subfields.

The main fields of study for Collins include:

  • Engineering
  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Within these areas, their work concentrates on specific subfields such as:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Signal Processing

The key topics addressed by Collins involve a combination of biomechanical and computational approaches, including:

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Human Motion and Animation

Collins has contributed to several research papers, predominantly published in widely recognized venues. Examples of recent publications are:

  • A Light-Weight Contrastive Approach for Aligning Human Pose Sequences (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Image-Based Stability Quantification (2022), IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Image-based Stability Quantification (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • From Kinematics To Dynamics: Estimating Center of Pressure and Base of Support from Video Frames of Human Motion (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Table of Contents (2020), The Journal of the American Dental Association

The venues where Collins frequently publishes research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association

Collins collaborates with several coauthors, notably including:

  • Jesse Scott
  • Yanxi Liu
  • B. Ravichandran
  • Christopher Funk
  • John H. Challis

Their body of work reflects a multidisciplinary approach targeting biomedical applications through computational techniques, focusing on human motion, stability, and gait analysis with applications in healthcare and rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • Online selection of discriminative tracking features

    R.T. Collins;Yanxi Liu;M. Leordeanu

  • A System for Video Surveillance and Monitoring

    Robert T. Collins;Alan J. Lipton;Takeo Kanade;Hironobu Fujiyoshi

  • Mean-shift blob tracking through scale space

    R.T. Collins

  • Algorithms for cooperative multisensor surveillance

    R.T. Collins;A.J. Lipton;H. Fujiyoshi;T. Kanade

  • A space-sweep approach to true multi-image matching

    R.T. Collins

  • Silhouette-based human identification from body shape and gait

    R.T. Collins;R. Gross;Jianbo Shi

  • Introduction to the special section on video surveillance

    R.T. Collins;A.J. Lipton;T. Kanade

  • Three-dimensional scene flow

    S. Vedula;S. Baker;P. Rander;R. Collins

  • Vision-Based Analysis of Small Groups in Pedestrian Crowds

    Weina Ge;R. T. Collins;R. B. Ruback

  • Three-dimensional scene flow

    S. Vedula;P. Rander;R. Collins;T. Kanade

  • The Schema System

    B. Draper;R. Collins;J. Brolio;A. Hanson

  • A computational model for periodic pattern perception based on frieze and wallpaper groups

    Yanxi Liu;R.T. Collins;Y. Tsin

  • Multi-target Tracking by Lagrangian Relaxation to Min-cost Network Flow

    Asad A. Butt;Robert T. Collins

  • Marked point processes for crowd counting

    Weina Ge;Robert T Collins

  • Advances in Cooperative Multi-Sensor Video Surveillance

    Takeo Kanade;Robert T. Collins;Alan J. Lipton;Peter Burt

  • Gait Sequence Analysis Using Frieze Patterns

    Yanxi Liu;Robert T. Collins;Yanghai Tsin

  • A master-slave system to acquire biometric imagery of humans at distance

    Xuhui Zhou;Robert T. Collins;Takeo Kanade;Peter Metes

  • Vanishing point calculation as a statistical inference on the unit sphere

    R.T. Collins;R.S. Weiss

  • Deformed Lattice Detection in Real-World Images Using Mean-Shift Belief Propagation

    Minwoo Park;K. Brocklehurst;R.T. Collins;Yanxi Liu

  • Robust midsagittal plane extraction from normal and pathological 3-D neuroradiology images

    Yanxi Liu;R.T. Collins;W.E. Rothfus

  • A System for Video Surveillance and Monitoring CMU VSAM Final Report

    Takeo Kanade;Robert T. Collins;Alan J. Lipton;Hironobu Fujiyoshi

Frequent Co-Authors

Yanxi Liu
Yanxi Liu Pennsylvania State University
Takeo Kanade
Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University
Allen R. Hanson
Allen R. Hanson University of Massachusetts Amherst
Edward M. Riseman
Edward M. Riseman University of Massachusetts Amherst
Osman A. Basaran
Osman A. Basaran Purdue University West Lafayette
Martial Hebert
Martial Hebert Carnegie Mellon University
Jiebo Luo
Jiebo Luo University of Rochester
Simon Baker
Simon Baker Microsoft (United States)
Bruce A. Draper
Bruce A. Draper Colorado State University
Gary L. Miller
Gary L. Miller Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students seek flexible, affordable programs that allow them to balance education with other responsibilities. For those looking to fast-track their education, quickest cheapest masters degree programs can be an excellent choice. They allow you to earn a reputable credential in less time and often at a lower cost.

Deciding what masters program should I do is crucial for aligning your studies with your career goals. Specialized master's degrees in technology are highly sought after by employers, especially those in high-growth fields like data science and cybersecurity.

If you’re just starting out, an online associate degree is a practical first step. These programs lay the groundwork for advanced study while helping you qualify for entry-level tech positions.

Finally, cost is always a key consideration. Choosing one of the cheapest online degrees enables you to maximize your investment while minimizing debt—making your path in computer science more accessible and sustainable.

Best Scientists Citing Robert T. Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles