World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 79 1690 1539 174 158 388 21524

Gordon T. Plant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gordon T. Plant between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gordon T. Plant published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2011. 17 of the 409 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2011. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications
1980 2025

409 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gordon T. Plant: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 0
1982 2
1983 4
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 3
1988 0
1989 5
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 3
1996 6
1997 4
1998 4
1999 9
2000 15
2001 18
2002 18
2003 9
2004 18
2005 18
2006 19
2007 12
2008 18
2009 16
2010 18
2011 21
2012 19
2013 14
2014 20
2015 13
2016 17
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 6
2021 7
2022 11
2023 5
2024 10
2025 7
Total 409
Download as CSV

Gordon T. Plant publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon T. Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 388–397 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 388 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54 388
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Gordon T. Plant D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon T. Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146 79
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Gordon T. Plant is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. They have contributed extensively to the study of retinal and optic conditions as well as neurological disorders.

The scientist has published in a variety of academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Acta Ophthalmologica
  • Practical Neurology
  • Cephalalgia
  • Ophthalmology
  • Eye

Gordon T. Plant's research covers a range of topics that include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and optic conditions
  • Multiple sclerosis research studies
  • Retinal development and disorders
  • Retinal diseases and treatments
  • Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
  • Ocular diseases and Behçet's syndrome

Their recent scientific papers demonstrate active involvement in both ophthalmology and neurology research. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Trends in Optic Neuritis Incidence and Prevalence in the UK and Association With Systemic and Neurologic Disease," 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • "Photophobia in migraine: A symptom cluster?," 2021, Cephalalgia
  • "Associations of Alcohol Consumption and Smoking With Disease Risk and Neurodegeneration in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom," 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • "Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy," 2022, Ophthalmology Science
  • "The Occurrence of Intraretinal and Subretinal Fluid in Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy," 2023, Ophthalmology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gordon T. Plant include:

  • Axel Petzold
  • Iris Kleerekooper
  • S. Anand Trip
  • Anne-Catherine Chapelle
  • Susan P. Mollan

Their publication record reflects a multidisciplinary approach, integrating ophthalmology with neurology and molecular biology to address complex ocular and neurological conditions. This breadth is further illustrated by subfields of study such as pathology and forensic medicine appearing among their research interests.

Best Publications

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study.

    Aravinthan Varatharaj;Aravinthan Varatharaj;Naomi Thomas;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Nicholas W S Davies

  • Retinal nerve fiber layer axonal loss and visual dysfunction in optic neuritis.

    S Anand Trip;S Anand Trip;Patricio G Schlottmann;Stephen J Jones;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • Early development of multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive grey matter atrophy in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes.

    Catherine M. Dalton;Declan T. Chard;Gerard R. Davies;Katherine A. Miszkiel

  • MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study.

    Josephine K Swanton;Alex Rovira;Mar Tintore;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • UK guidelines for the management of pituitary apoplexy

    Senthil Rajasekaran;Mark Vanderpump;Stephanie Baldeweg;Will Drake

  • Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis

    Catherine M. Dalton;Peter A. Brex;Katherine A. Miszkiel;Simon J. Hickman

  • A decamer duplication in the 3′ region of the BRI gene originates an amyloid peptide that is associated with dementia in a Danish kindred

    Ruben Vidal;Tamas Révész;Agueda Rostagno;Eugene Kim

  • Management of acute optic neuritis

    SJ Hickman;SJ Hickman;CM Dalton;CM Dalton;DH Miller;GT Plant

  • Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathies: A Pathologic, Biochemical, and Genetic View

    Tamas Revesz;Jorge Ghiso;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of sporadic and hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathies

    Tamas Revesz;Janice L. Holton;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • An investigation of the retinal nerve fibre layer in progressive multiple sclerosis using optical coherence tomography.

    Andrew Patrick David Henderson;S. Anand Trip;Patricio Gerardo Schlottmann;Daniel Ricardo Altmann

  • Quality control for retinal OCT in multiple sclerosis: validation of the OSCAR-IB criteria

    S. Schippling;L. J. Balk;F. Costello;P. Albrecht

  • The investigation of acute optic neuritis: a review and proposed protocol

    Axel Petzold;Mike P. Wattjes;Fiona Costello;Jose Flores-Rivera

  • Modification of MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes

    J K Swanton;K Fernando;C M Dalton;K A Miszkiel

  • Retrograde trans-synaptic retinal ganglion cell loss identified by optical coherence tomography

    Panitha Jindahra;Aviva Petrie;Gordon T. Plant

  • Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis.

    K T M Fernando;M A McLean;D T Chard;D G MacManus

  • Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    D J Werring;E T Bullmore;A T Toosy;D H Miller

  • Sporadic and familial cerebral amyloid angiopathies.

    Tamas Revesz;Janice L. Holton;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • Detection of ventricular enlargement in patients at the earliest clinical stage of MS

    P A Brex;Richard Jenkins;N C Fox;William Crum

  • Optic nerve atrophy and retinal nerve fibre layer thinning following optic neuritis: Evidence that axonal loss is a substrate of MRI-detected atrophy

    S. Anand Trip;Patricio G. Schlottmann;Stephen J. Jones;Wai-Yung Li

  • Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION).

    D. Kidd;B. Burton;G. T. Plant;E. M. Graham

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel Petzold
Axel Petzold University College London
Alan J. Thompson
Alan J. Thompson University College London
Jorge Ghiso
Jorge Ghiso New York University
Tamas Revesz
Tamas Revesz University College London
Daniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann Imperial College London
Blas Frangione
Blas Frangione New York University
Janice L. Holton
Janice L. Holton University College London
Holly Bridge
Holly Bridge University of Oxford
Gareth J. Barker
Gareth J. Barker King's College London
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can expand your knowledge and open diverse career pathways. For example, programs such as a bachelor of psychology online provide a strong foundation in human behavior, mental health, and research skills. This degree can lead to entry-level roles in healthcare, research, or social services.

For those seeking advanced positions, an online masters in psychology can offer specialized knowledge and prepare you for roles in research, counseling, or teaching. Individuals interested in therapeutic careers may consider a marriage and family therapist degree, which blends psychological theory with practical skills for supporting families and couples.

Another related pathway is the field of social work. Accredited msw programs (Master of Social Work) prepare graduates for impactful roles in mental health, advocacy, and community services.

Each of these online degrees complements your Neuroscience background, offering flexible options to advance your career in health, science, or social support professions.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon T. Plant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles