World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
21524
World Ranking
1690
National Ranking
174

Gordon T. Plant publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon T. Plant sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 388 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gordon T. Plant D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon T. Plant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon T. Plant is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. They have contributed extensively to the study of retinal and optic conditions as well as neurological disorders.

The scientist has published in a variety of academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Acta Ophthalmologica
  • Practical Neurology
  • Cephalalgia
  • Ophthalmology
  • Eye

Gordon T. Plant's research covers a range of topics that include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and optic conditions
  • Multiple sclerosis research studies
  • Retinal development and disorders
  • Retinal diseases and treatments
  • Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
  • Ocular diseases and Behçet's syndrome

Their recent scientific papers demonstrate active involvement in both ophthalmology and neurology research. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Trends in Optic Neuritis Incidence and Prevalence in the UK and Association With Systemic and Neurologic Disease," 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • "Photophobia in migraine: A symptom cluster?," 2021, Cephalalgia
  • "Associations of Alcohol Consumption and Smoking With Disease Risk and Neurodegeneration in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis in the United Kingdom," 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • "Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy," 2022, Ophthalmology Science
  • "The Occurrence of Intraretinal and Subretinal Fluid in Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy," 2023, Ophthalmology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gordon T. Plant include:

  • Axel Petzold
  • Iris Kleerekooper
  • S. Anand Trip
  • Anne-Catherine Chapelle
  • Susan P. Mollan

Their publication record reflects a multidisciplinary approach, integrating ophthalmology with neurology and molecular biology to address complex ocular and neurological conditions. This breadth is further illustrated by subfields of study such as pathology and forensic medicine appearing among their research interests.

Best Publications

  • Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study.

    Aravinthan Varatharaj;Aravinthan Varatharaj;Naomi Thomas;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Mark A Ellul;Nicholas W S Davies

  • Retinal nerve fiber layer axonal loss and visual dysfunction in optic neuritis.

    S Anand Trip;S Anand Trip;Patricio G Schlottmann;Stephen J Jones;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • Early development of multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive grey matter atrophy in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes.

    Catherine M. Dalton;Declan T. Chard;Gerard R. Davies;Katherine A. Miszkiel

  • MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study.

    Josephine K Swanton;Alex Rovira;Mar Tintore;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • UK guidelines for the management of pituitary apoplexy

    Senthil Rajasekaran;Mark Vanderpump;Stephanie Baldeweg;Will Drake

  • Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis

    Catherine M. Dalton;Peter A. Brex;Katherine A. Miszkiel;Simon J. Hickman

  • A decamer duplication in the 3′ region of the BRI gene originates an amyloid peptide that is associated with dementia in a Danish kindred

    Ruben Vidal;Tamas Révész;Agueda Rostagno;Eugene Kim

  • Management of acute optic neuritis

    SJ Hickman;SJ Hickman;CM Dalton;CM Dalton;DH Miller;GT Plant

  • Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathies: A Pathologic, Biochemical, and Genetic View

    Tamas Revesz;Jorge Ghiso;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of sporadic and hereditary cerebral amyloid angiopathies

    Tamas Revesz;Janice L. Holton;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • An investigation of the retinal nerve fibre layer in progressive multiple sclerosis using optical coherence tomography.

    Andrew Patrick David Henderson;S. Anand Trip;Patricio Gerardo Schlottmann;Daniel Ricardo Altmann

  • Quality control for retinal OCT in multiple sclerosis: validation of the OSCAR-IB criteria

    S. Schippling;L. J. Balk;F. Costello;P. Albrecht

  • The investigation of acute optic neuritis: a review and proposed protocol

    Axel Petzold;Mike P. Wattjes;Fiona Costello;Jose Flores-Rivera

  • Modification of MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes

    J K Swanton;K Fernando;C M Dalton;K A Miszkiel

  • Retrograde trans-synaptic retinal ganglion cell loss identified by optical coherence tomography

    Panitha Jindahra;Aviva Petrie;Gordon T. Plant

  • Elevated white matter myo-inositol in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis.

    K T M Fernando;M A McLean;D T Chard;D G MacManus

  • Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    D J Werring;E T Bullmore;A T Toosy;D H Miller

  • Sporadic and familial cerebral amyloid angiopathies.

    Tamas Revesz;Janice L. Holton;Tammaryn Lashley;Gordon Plant

  • Detection of ventricular enlargement in patients at the earliest clinical stage of MS

    P A Brex;Richard Jenkins;N C Fox;William Crum

  • Optic nerve atrophy and retinal nerve fibre layer thinning following optic neuritis: Evidence that axonal loss is a substrate of MRI-detected atrophy

    S. Anand Trip;Patricio G. Schlottmann;Stephen J. Jones;Wai-Yung Li

  • Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION).

    D. Kidd;B. Burton;G. T. Plant;E. M. Graham

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel Petzold
Axel Petzold University College London
Alan J. Thompson
Alan J. Thompson University College London
Jorge Ghiso
Jorge Ghiso New York University
Tamas Revesz
Tamas Revesz University College London
Daniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann Imperial College London
Blas Frangione
Blas Frangione New York University
Janice L. Holton
Janice L. Holton University College London
Holly Bridge
Holly Bridge University of Oxford
Gareth J. Barker
Gareth J. Barker King's College London
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can expand your knowledge and open diverse career pathways. For example, programs such as a bachelor of psychology online provide a strong foundation in human behavior, mental health, and research skills. This degree can lead to entry-level roles in healthcare, research, or social services.

For those seeking advanced positions, an online masters in psychology can offer specialized knowledge and prepare you for roles in research, counseling, or teaching. Individuals interested in therapeutic careers may consider a marriage and family therapist degree, which blends psychological theory with practical skills for supporting families and couples.

Another related pathway is the field of social work. Accredited msw programs (Master of Social Work) prepare graduates for impactful roles in mental health, advocacy, and community services.

Each of these online degrees complements your Neuroscience background, offering flexible options to advance your career in health, science, or social support professions.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon T. Plant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles