World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
22492
World Ranking
17153
National Ranking
8596

Frank G. Shellock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank G. Shellock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 338 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank G. Shellock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank G. Shellock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank G. Shellock is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's scholarly output extensively covers various topics related to advanced imaging and clinical applications, including:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Notable papers authored by Frank G. Shellock include:

  • Managing Patients With Unlabeled Passive Implants on MR Systems Operating Below 1.5 T, 2023, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • MRI and Patients with Non-MRI-conditional Cardiac Devices: Further Evidence of Safety, 2020, Radiology

Other frequently published venues associated with their work include the American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Radiology Nursing, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Frequent coauthors in their publications are:

  • Matthew S. Rosen
  • Andrew Webb
  • W. Taylor Kimberly
  • Sunder S. Rajan
  • Aleksandar Nacev

Frank G. Shellock's research interests extend into medical device safety and the assessment of MRI compatibility, as reflected in their paper topics, which deal with MRI issues in clinical and technical contexts involving implants, cardiac devices, and breast tissue expanders.

Best Publications

  • Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations

    Vikas Gulani;Fernando Calamante;Fernando Calamante;Frank G Shellock;Emanuel Kanal

  • MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care.

    Frank G Shellock;John V Crues

  • Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging

    T. Fukunaga;R. R. Roy;F. G. Shellock;F. G. Shellock;J. A. Hodgson

  • Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla

    Edward T Martin;James A Coman;Frank G Shellock;Christopher C Pulling

  • Specific tension of human plantar flexors and dorsiflexors

    T. Fukunaga;R. R. Roy;F. G. Shellock;J. A. Hodgson

  • Patellofemoral Kinematics During Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Knee Extension in Persons With Lateral Subluxation of the Patella: A Preliminary Study

    Christopher M. Powers;Samuel R. Ward;Michael Fredericson;Marc Guillet

  • Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review.

    Frank G. Shellock

  • Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents

    Frank G. Shellock;Emanuel Kanal

  • Safety considerations in MR imaging.

    E Kanal;F G Shellock;L Talagala

  • Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla.

    Ali R. Rezai;Daniel Finelli;John A. Nyenhuis;Greg Hrdlicka

  • Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report.

    Jaimie M. Henderson;Jean Tkach;Michael Phillips;Kenneth Baker

  • Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. SMRI Safety Committee

    Emanuel Kanal;Frank G. Shellock

  • Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating.

    Kenneth B. Baker;Jean A. Tkach;John A. Nyenhuis;Michael Phillips

  • Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system

    Patrick R. Connelly;Michael L. Weiner;Stuart G. Macdonald;Jeffrey L. Helfer

  • Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices

    Frank G Shellock

  • Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices.

    Frank G. Shellock

  • Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.

    Frank G. Shellock

  • Magnetic Resonance: Bioeffects, Safety and Patient Management

    Frank G. Shellock;Emanuel Kanal

  • Auditory Noise Associated With MR Procedures: A Review

    Mark McJury;Frank G. Shellock

  • Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations.

    Ali R. Rezai;Michael Phillips;Kenneth B. Baker;Ashwini D. Sharan

Frequent Co-Authors

Prediman K. Shah
Prediman K. Shah Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Christopher M. Powers
Christopher M. Powers University of Southern California
Ali R. Rezai
Ali R. Rezai West Virginia University
H.J.C. Swan
H.J.C. Swan University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth B. Baker
Kenneth B. Baker Cleveland Clinic
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Ashwini Sharan
Ashwini Sharan Thomas Jefferson University
Tetsuo Fukunaga
Tetsuo Fukunaga National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya
V. R. Edgerton
V. R. Edgerton University of California, Los Angeles
Roland R. Roy
Roland R. Roy University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing a career in medicine but want to explore alternative pathways, the healthcare industry offers a wide range of online degree options. For those seeking a foundation in medical administration, consider the online medical billing and coding with financial aid programs. These courses prepare you for essential support roles and often offer flexible schedules and financial aid opportunities.

Prospective nurses have multiple entry points. The lpn program no entrance exam options make it easier for students to start their nursing careers without additional testing barriers. For those already in the nursing field, advancing your qualifications is possible through rn to fnp programs, which offer a streamlined path to becoming a family nurse practitioner.

If leadership roles interest you, a healthcare administration degree can open doors in management, policy, or health services oversight. Whichever pathway you choose, online degrees give you flexibility, accessibility, and new opportunities in the evolving field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Frank G. Shellock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles