World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
24074
World Ranking
11930
National Ranking
646

Jörg F. Debatin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg F. Debatin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 335 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jörg F. Debatin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg F. Debatin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jörg F. Debatin is affiliated with the University Hospital Bonn in Germany. Their research profile does not currently list recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or specific data on book publications and fields of study.

While detailed information on the scientist's research topics, subfields of study, and main fields is not provided, their association with a major university hospital suggests a focus that could be related to medical or clinical research environments.

No records of awards or honors linked to Jörg F. Debatin are noted, and there is no indication that the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque With Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Particles of Iron Oxide in Hyperlipidemic Rabbits

    Stefan G. Ruehm;Claire Corot;Peter Vogt;Stefan Kolb

  • Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dual-Modality PET/CT in Preoperative Staging

    Gerald Antoch;Jörg Stattaus;Andre T Nemat;Simone Marnitz

  • Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology.

    Gerald Antoch;Florian M. Vogt;Lutz S. Freudenberg;Fridun Nazaradeh

  • Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET.

    Gerald Antoch;Nina Saoudi;Hilmar Kuehl;Gerlinde Dahmen

  • Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.

    Peter Hunold;Florian M Vogt;Axel Schmermund;Jörg F Debatin

  • MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study.

    Jörg Barkhausen;Stefan G. Ruehm;Mathias Goyen;Thomas Buck

  • Comparison of PET, CT, and Dual-Modality PET/CT Imaging for Monitoring of Imatinib (STI571) Therapy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

    Gerald Antoch;Jörg Kanja;Sebastian Bauer;Hilmar Kuehl

  • Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases.

    Thomas C Lauenstein;Susanne C Goehde;Christoph U Herborn;Matthias Goyen

  • 3D Contrast MR Angiography

    Martin R. Prince;Thomas M. Grist;Jörg F. Debatin

  • Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography

    D A Leung;G C McKinnon;C P Davis;T Pfammatter

  • Acquisition Protocol Considerations for Combined PET/CT Imaging

    Thomas Beyer;Gerald Antoch;Stefan Müller;Thomas Egelhof

  • To Enhance or Not to Enhance? 18F-FDG and CT Contrast Agents in Dual-Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT

    Gerald Antoch;Lutz S Freudenberg;Thomas Beyer;Andreas Bockisch

  • Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography.

    T F Hany;J F Debatin;D A Leung;T Pfammatter

  • Focal Tracer Uptake: A Potential Artifact in Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Modality PET/CT Scans

    Gerald Antoch;Lutz S Freudenberg;Thomas Egelhof;Jörg Stattaus

  • Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography.

    J. F. Debatin;C. E. Spritzer;T. M. Grist;C. Beam

  • Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

    Stefan G. Ruehm;Thomas F. Hany;Thomas Pfammatter;Ernst Schneider

  • Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis

    Stefan G Ruehm;Mathias Goyen;Jörg Barkhausen;Knut Kröger

  • Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.

    Wolfgang Luboldt;Peter Bauerfeind;Simon Wildermuth;Borut Marincek

  • Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging.

    Jörg Barkhausen;Peter Hunold;Holger Eggebrecht;Walter O Schüler

  • Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases

    Thomas C. Lauenstein;Lutz S. Freudenberg;Susanne C. Goehde;Stefan G. Ruehm

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald Antoch
Gerald Antoch Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Mark E. Ladd
Mark E. Ladd German Cancer Research Center
Andreas Bockisch
Andreas Bockisch University of Duisburg-Essen
Gustav K. von Schulthess
Gustav K. von Schulthess University of Zurich
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
René M. Botnar
René M. Botnar Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Charles L. Dumoulin
Charles L. Dumoulin Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Burkhardt Seifert
Burkhardt Seifert University of Zurich
Robert David Darrow
Robert David Darrow General Electric (United States)
Gerald Holtmann
Gerald Holtmann University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but looking for flexible alternatives to traditional medical degrees, several online options can help launch or advance your career. Completing a nursing degree online provides an accessible entry point for working in clinical and patient care roles, often at a lower cost and faster pace than a standard medical program.

Registered Nurses aiming to boost their credentials might consider the average cost of rn to bsn programs online, which can make career progression more affordable. For those pursuing advanced practice, online nursing phd programs offer pathways into research, teaching, and leadership roles.

If you’re switching careers and already have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, direct entry msn programs online can quickly prepare you for nursing practice without starting from scratch. Each pathway has different entry requirements, timelines, and costs—making it essential to research options and choose what fits your individual circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Jörg F. Debatin

Trending Scientists