World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6782 6514 36 36 359 7076

Fernando Rocha publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fernando Rocha between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fernando Rocha published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2025. 59 of the 486 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2025. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 40 publications
1990 2025

486 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fernando Rocha: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 7
2004 6
2005 19
2006 20
2007 16
2008 10
2009 16
2010 26
2011 21
2012 17
2013 23
2014 28
2015 17
2016 24
2017 16
2018 19
2019 32
2020 18
2021 23
2022 28
2023 17
2024 19
2025 40
Total 486
Download as CSV

Fernando Rocha publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Rocha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 359 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75 359
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Fernando Rocha D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Rocha sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Fernando Rocha is affiliated with the University of Aveiro in Portugal and specializes primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research portfolio includes a strong focus on subfields such as Pollution, Geochemistry and Petrology, Earth-Surface Processes, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, with particular attention to heavy metals in the environment, building materials and conservation, radioactivity and radon measurements, geochemistry and geologic mapping, therapeutic uses of natural elements, concrete and cement materials research, and geochemistry and elemental analysis.

Fernando Rocha has contributed to multiple recent papers published in notable journals. These include:

  • Geochemical, Mineralogical and Morphological Characterisation of Road Dust and Associated Health Risks, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Ecological quality status of the NE sector of the Guanabara Bay (Brazil): A case of living benthic foraminiferal resilience, 2020, Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Earth Construction: A Systematic Literature Review Considering Five Construction Techniques, 2022, Sustainability
  • Long-term eutrophication and contamination of the central area of Sepetiba Bay (SW Brazil), 2021, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
  • Fine Particulate Matter and Gaseous Compounds in Kitchens and Outdoor Air of Different Dwellings, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

The scientist has frequently collaborated with other researchers, including Carla Candeias, Maria Virgínia Alves Martins, Slávka Andrejkovičová, Denise Terroso, and Eduardo Ferreira da Silva. These collaborations have contributed to a diversified and multidisciplinary research output.

Fernando Rocha's work is frequently published in journals such as Minerals, Applied Sciences, Environmental Earth Sciences, Preprints.org, and Geosciences. The scientist's publications span a range of topics intersecting environmental factors with earth science processes and applied engineering perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Mineralogical transformations of calcareous rich clays with firing: A comparative study between calcite and dolomite rich clays from Algarve, Portugal

    M.J. Trindade;M.I. Dias;J. Coroado;F. Rocha

  • Composition and technological properties of geopolymers based on metakaolin and red mud

    W. Hajjaji;S. Andrejkovičová;C. Zanelli;M. Alshaaer

  • The effect of natural zeolite on microstructure, mechanical and heavy metals adsorption properties of metakaolin based geopolymers

    S. Andrejkovičová;A. Sudagar;J. Rocha;C. Patinha

  • Clay minerals from the sedimentary cover from the Northwest Iberian shelf

    A. Oliveira;F. Rocha;A. Rodrigues;J. Jouanneau

  • A multiproxy approach of the Holocene evolution of shelf-slope circulation on the NW Iberian Continental Shelf

    Virgínia Martins;Jesús Dubert;Jean-Marie Jouanneau;Olivier Weber

  • Effect of bentonite characteristics on the elemental composition of wine

    Sofia Catarino;M. Madeira;F. Monteiro;F. Rocha

  • Lead removal from aqueous solutions by a Tunisian smectitic clay.

    Islem Chaari;Emna Fakhfakh;Salima Chakroun;Jalel Bouzid

  • Assessment of the health quality of Ria de Aveiro (Portugal): heavy metals and benthic foraminifera.

    Virgínia A. Martins;Fabrizio Frontalini;Keila M. Tramonte;Rubens C.L. Figueira

  • Effects of sand addition on production of lightweight aggregates from Tunisian smectite-rich clayey rocks

    E. Fakhfakh;W. Hajjaji;M. Medhioub;F. Rocha

  • Characterisation of roman mortars from Conímbriga with respect to their repair

    A.L. Velosa;J. Coroado;M.R. Veiga;F. Rocha

  • Lateglacial and Holocene environmental changes in Portuguese coastal lagoons 1: the sedimentological and geochemical records of the Santo André coastal area

    Maria da Conceição Freitas;César Andrade;Fernando Rocha;Colombo Celso Gaeta Tassinari

  • Preparation, characterization and application in controlled release of Ibuprofen-loaded Guar Gum/Montmorillonite Bionanocomposites

    Joanna Dziadkowiec;Joanna Dziadkowiec;Rola Mansa;Ana Quintela;Fernando Rocha

  • POZZOLANIC ACTIVITY OF METAKAOLINS BY THE FRENCH STANDARD OF THE MODIFIED CHAPELLE TEST: A DIRECT METHODOLOGY

    Eduardo Ferraz;Walid Hajjaji;Ana Luísa Velosa;António Santos Silva

  • Environmental Quality Assessment of Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) Using Living Foraminifera Assemblages and a Multiproxy Approach.

    Maria Virgínia Alves Martins;Noureddine Zaaboub;Lotfi Aleya;Fabrizio Frontalini

  • Characteristics of distinct ash flows in a biomass thermal power plant with bubbling fluidised bed combustor

    L.A.C. Tarelho;E.R. Teixeira;D.F.R. Silva;R.C.E. Modolo

  • FIRING TESTS ON CLAY-RICH RAW MATERIALS FROM THE ALGARVE BASIN (SOUTHERN PORTUGAL): STUDY OF MINERAL TRANSFORMATIONS WITH TEMPERATURE

    Maria José Trindade;Maria Isabel Dias;João Coroado;João Coroado;Fernando Rocha

  • Tracing the late Holocene evolution of the NW Iberian upwelling system

    Virgínia Martins;Jean-Marie Jouanneau;Olivier Weber;Fernando Rocha

  • Argilas aplicadas a estudos litoestratigráficos e paleoambientais na bacia sedimentar de Aveiro

    Fernando Joaquim Fernandes Tavares Rocha

  • Eggshell waste to produce building lime: calcium oxide reactivity, industrial, environmental and economic implications

    Eduardo Ferraz;José A. F. Gamelas;João Coroado;Carlos Monteiro

  • The sustainability of adobe construction: past to future

    Cristiana Costa;Ângela Cerqueira;Fernando Rocha;Ana Velosa

  • Geostatistical analysis of the influence of textural, mineralogical and geochemical parameters on the geotechnical behaviour of the 'Argilas de Aveiro' Formation (Portugal)

    C. Galhano;F. Rocha;C. Gomes

  • The Oued Mellègue: Mining activity, stream sediments and dispersion of base metals in natural environments, North-western Tunisia

    A. Mlayah;E. Ferreira da Silva;F. Rocha;Ch. Ben Hamza

Frequent Co-Authors

José A. Teixeira
José A. Teixeira University of Minho
João Alveirinho Dias
João Alveirinho Dias University of Algarve
Fabrizio Frontalini
Fabrizio Frontalini University of Urbino
João A. Labrincha
João A. Labrincha University of Aveiro
Célia Alves
Célia Alves University of Aveiro
Alberto López-Galindo
Alberto López-Galindo Spanish National Research Council
Rubens Cesar Lopes Figueira
Rubens Cesar Lopes Figueira Universidade de São Paulo
Deolinda Flores
Deolinda Flores University of Porto
João Miguel Dias
João Miguel Dias University of Aveiro
Robert C. Pullar
Robert C. Pullar Ca Foscari University of Venice

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Public administration plays a vital role in shaping environmental policy and management. Those interested can consider online MPA degrees which equip professionals with leadership skills in government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in environmental work, affecting community engagement and sustainable development. Earning one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can enhance a graduate’s expertise in these areas, complementing environmental knowledge.

For those wishing to advance research and leadership credentials without a traditional lengthy dissertation process, 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation offer accelerated and flexible options. These programs help professionals pivot or deepen expertise efficiently.

Moreover, educators and administrators aiming to integrate environmental education into programs may benefit from online Eds to EdD programs, designed to foster leadership skills in academic settings. Together, these degree pathways highlight the multidisciplinary nature of environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Rocha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles