World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2927 2687 1683 1511 135 19895

Keith McBurnett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith McBurnett between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith McBurnett published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2014. 3 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2014. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1987 2024

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith McBurnett: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 3
1991 5
1992 1
1993 5
1994 5
1995 2
1996 2
1997 5
1998 2
1999 3
2000 7
2001 6
2002 4
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 7
2008 3
2009 2
2010 1
2011 5
2012 4
2013 5
2014 9
2015 2
2016 7
2017 6
2018 6
2019 5
2020 4
2021 1
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
Total 135
Download as CSV

Keith McBurnett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith McBurnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith McBurnett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith McBurnett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith McBurnett is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a specific focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their main research topics include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Children's Physical and Motor Development, Cognitive Functions and Memory, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

McBurnett has published extensively, with a number of papers appearing in notable journals. Key recent publications include:

  • Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome, 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13-Month Follow-up, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Do Parents' ADHD Symptoms Affect Treatment for their Children? The Impact of Parental ADHD on Adherence to Behavioral Parent Training for Childhood ADHD, 2020, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
  • Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome-Clinical Interview (CDS-CI): Psychometric support for caregiver and youth versions, 2024, Psychological Assessment
  • Parental Cognitions, Treatment Engagement, and Child Outcomes of ADHD Behavioral Treatment among Asian American Families, 2023, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Keith McBurnett frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Linda J. Pfiffner, Stephen P. Hinshaw, Stephen P. Becker, Joseph W. Fredrick, and G. Leonard Burns.

Their work has been published repeatedly in several key venues such as:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment

Best Publications

  • DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Brooks Applegate;Keith McBurnett;Joseph Biederman

  • Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes.

    Erik G. Willcutt;Joel T. Nigg;Bruce F. Pennington;Mary V. Solanto

  • Psychopathy and conduct problems in children.

    Paul J. Frick;Bridget S. O'Brien;Jane M. Wootton;Keith McBurnett

  • Low salivary cortisol and persistent aggression in boys referred for disruptive behavior.

    Keith McBurnett;Benjamin B. Lahey;Paul J. Rathouz;Rolf Loeber;Rolf Loeber

  • Validity of the age-of-onset criterion for ADHD: a report from the DSM-IV field trials.

    Brooks Applegate;Benjamin B. Lahey;Elizabeth L. Hart;Joseph Biederman

  • Annotation: the development of antisocial behavior: an integrative causal model.

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Irwin D. Waldman;Keith McBurnett

  • Psychopathology in the Parents of Children with Conduct Disorder and Hyperactivity

    Benjamin B. Lahey;John C. Piacentini;Keith McBURNETT;Penny Stone

  • The Reliability and Validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean Version (K-SADS-PL-K)

    Young Shin Kim;Keun Ah Cheon;Boong Nyun Kim;Soon Ah Chang

  • Randomized, controlled trial of oros methylphenidate once a day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Mark L. Wolraich;Laurence L. Greenhill;William Pelham;James Swanson

  • Effect of Stimulant Medication on Children with Attention Deficit Disorder: A “Review of Reviews”

    James M. Swanson;Keith McBurnett;Tim Wigal;Linda J. Pfiffner

  • Symptom properties as a function of ADHD type: an argument for continued study of sluggish cognitive tempo.

    Keith McBurnett;Linda J. Pfiffner;Paul J. Frick

  • Social skills training with parent generalization: Treatment effects for children with attention deficit disorder.

    Linda J. Pfiffner;Keith McBurnett

  • Behavioral versus behavioral and pharmacological treatment in ADHD children attending a summer treatment program.

    William E. Pelham;Elizabeth M. Gnagy;Andrew R. Greiner;Betsy Hoza

  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guanfacine extended release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Joseph Biederman;Raun D Melmed;Anil Patel;Keith McBurnett

  • The Internal, External, and Diagnostic Validity of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review.

    Stephen P. Becker;Daniel R. Leopold;G. Leonard Burns;Matthew A. Jarrett

  • DSM-IV Field Trials for the Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Symptom Utility Estimates

    Paul J. Frick;Benjamin B. Lahey;Brooks Applegate;Lynn Kerdyck

  • Anxiety, Inhibition, and Conduct Disorder in Children: I. Relations to Social Impairment

    Jason L. Walker;Benjamin B. Lahey;Mary F. Russo;Paul J. Frick

  • Stimulant Medications and the Treatment of Children with ADHD

    James M. Swanson;Keith McBurnett;Diane L. Christian;Tim Wigal

  • Validity of DSM-IV subtypes of conduct disorder based on age of onset

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Rolf Loeber;Herbert C. Quay;Brooks Applegate

  • Findings on Disruptive Behavior Disorders from the First Decade of the Developmental Trends Study

    Rolf Loeber;Stephanie M. Green;Benjamin B. Lahey;Paul J. Frick

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda J. Pfiffner
Linda J. Pfiffner University of California, San Francisco
Benjamin B. Lahey
Benjamin B. Lahey University of Chicago
Rolf Loeber
Rolf Loeber University of Pittsburgh
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Stephen P. Hinshaw University of California, Berkeley
Paul J. Frick
Paul J. Frick Louisiana State University
James M. Swanson
James M. Swanson University of California, Irvine
Stephen P. Becker
Stephen P. Becker Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jeffrey H. Newcorn
Jeffrey H. Newcorn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
George W. Hynd
George W. Hynd University of Georgia
Timothy E. Wilens
Timothy E. Wilens Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, both through traditional roles and specialized credentials. Many students pursue online psychology degrees to gain foundational knowledge before advancing into focused areas, such as behavioral analysis.

Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification is a popular pathway that requires meeting specific educational and licensure standards. If you're interested in the Port St. Lucie bcba education requirements, you'll need a graduate degree in psychology or a related field as well as supervised experience and passing scores on the BCBA exam.

Aspiring professionals seeking information about how to become a bcba in Portland or those researching bcba certification requirements in Raleigh will notice each state may set its specifics regarding coursework and licensing.

For instance, understanding bcba certification requirements in Reno can help guide your education and practicum choices if you plan to practice in Nevada. Exploring these pathways helps students tailor their educational journey and maximize career prospects in both clinical and community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Keith McBurnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles