World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 9006 8320 529 483 78 5259

Alan S. Hazell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan S. Hazell between 1993 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan S. Hazell published across 32 years, from 1993 to 2024, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1999. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1999. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1993 2024

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan S. Hazell: publications per year, 1993 to 2024
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 5
1999 6
2000 2
2001 3
2002 6
2003 5
2004 5
2005 6
2006 5
2007 5
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 3
2012 1
2013 2
2014 5
2015 3
2016 1
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Alan S. Hazell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan S. Hazell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 78
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan S. Hazell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan S. Hazell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan S. Hazell is a researcher affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their academic work spans multiple fields within medicine, primarily focusing on neurology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, developmental neuroscience, and infectious diseases.

Their research topics prominently include:

  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis

Hazell has contributed to the scientific community through publications in venues such as Neurochemical Research and Metabolic Brain Disease. These publications reflect their focus on brain health, metabolism, and neurological conditions.

Recent notable papers include:

  • Region-selective permeability of the blood-brain barrier to α-aminoisobutyric acid during thiamine deficiency and following its reversal, 2020, Metabolic Brain Disease
  • Stem Cell Therapy and Thiamine Deficiency-Induced Brain Damage, 2024, Neurochemical Research

Their collaborations include work with frequent coauthors such as Roger F. Butterworth, contributing jointly to advancing the understanding of thiamine deficiency and related neurological impacts.

Alan S. Hazell's work is situated within the broader context of medicine, with a particular concentration on the mechanisms underlying brain disorders associated with nutritional deficiencies and metabolic dysfunctions. Their research addresses both clinical and experimental questions related to neurochemical changes, brain barrier permeability, and therapeutic approaches, including stem cell therapy.

This multidisciplinary focus integrates concepts from neurology, metabolism, and infectious disease research, highlighting intersections between brain function, systemic metabolic conditions, and regenerative medicine.

Best Publications

  • Excitotoxic mechanisms and the role of astrocytic glutamate transporters in traumatic brain injury

    Jae-Hyuk Yi;Alan S. Hazell

  • Hepatic encephalopathy: An update of pathophysiologic mechanisms.

    Alan S. Hazell;Roger F. Butterworth

  • Excitotoxic mechanisms in stroke: an update of concepts and treatment strategies.

    Alan S. Hazell

  • Manganese neurotoxicity: an update of pathophysiologic mechanisms.

    Louise Normandin;Alan S Hazell

  • Update of Cell Damage Mechanisms in Thiamine Deficiency: Focus on Oxidative Stress, Excitotoxicity and Inflammation

    Alan S Hazell;Roger F Butterworth

  • Mechanisms of Neuronal Cell Death in Wernicke's Encephalopathy

    Alan S. Hazell;Kathryn G. Todd;Roger F. Butterworth

  • Energy metabolism in astrocytes and neurons treated with manganese: relation among cell-specific energy failure, glucose metabolism, and intercellular trafficking using multinuclear NMR-spectroscopic analysis.

    Claudia Zwingmann;Claudia Zwingmann;Dieter Leibfritz;Alan S Hazell

  • Astrocytes and manganese neurotoxicity.

    Alan S Hazell

  • Thiamine deficiency: an update of pathophysiologic mechanisms and future therapeutic considerations.

    Eman Abdou;Alan S. Hazell

  • Cerebral Vulnerability Is Associated with Selective Increase in Extracellular Glutamate Concentration in Experimental Thiamine Deficiency

    Alan S. Hazell;Roger F. Butterworth;Antoine M. Hakim

  • Effects of ammonia on glutamate transporter (GLAST) protein and mRNA in cultured rat cortical astrocytes

    Helen Chan;Alan S Hazell;Paul Desjardins;Roger F Butterworth

  • Manganese Decreases Glutamate Uptake in Cultured Astrocytes

    Alan S. Hazell;Michael D. Norenberg;Michael D. Norenberg

  • Astrocytes are a major target in thiamine deficiency and Wernicke's encephalopathy

    Alan S. Hazell

  • Modeling neurodegenerative disease pathophysiology in thiamine deficiency: consequences of impaired oxidative metabolism.

    Shivraj S. Jhala;Alan S. Hazell

  • Selective down-regulation of the astrocyte glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST within the medial thalamus in experimental Wernicke's encephalopathy.

    Alan S. Hazell;K. V. Rama Rao;Niels C. Danbolt;David V. Pow

  • Immunohistochemical detection of inducible nitric oxide synthase, nitrotyrosine and manganese superoxide dismutase following hyperglycemic focal cerebral ischemia.

    Line Ste-Marie;Alan S Hazell;Chantal Bémeur;Roger Butterworth

  • 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) decreases glutamate uptake in cultured astrocytes

    Alan S. Hazell;Yossef Itzhak;Huaping Liu;Michael D. Norenberg;Michael D. Norenberg

  • Induction of astrocytic cyclooxygenase-2 in epileptic patients with hippocampal sclerosis.

    Paul Desjardins;Anny Sauvageau;Alain Bouthillier;Darren Navarro

  • Alzheimer type II astrocytic changes following sub-acute exposure to manganese and its prevention by antioxidant treatment.

    Alan S. Hazell;Louise Normandin;Michael D. Norenberg;Gregory Kennedy

  • Thiamine deficiency results in metabolic acidosis and energy failure in cerebellar granule cells: an in vitro model for the study of cell death mechanisms in Wernicke's encephalopathy.

    Pierre Pannunzio;Alan S. Hazell;Marc Pannunzio;K.V. Rama Rao

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger F. Butterworth
Roger F. Butterworth University of Montreal
Michael D. Norenberg
Michael D. Norenberg University of Miami
Raghu Vemuganti
Raghu Vemuganti University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dieter Leibfritz
Dieter Leibfritz University of Bremen
David V. Pow
David V. Pow University of Queensland
Phillip F. Gardiner
Phillip F. Gardiner University of Manitoba
David A. Cheresh
David A. Cheresh University of California, San Diego
Iscia Lopes-Cendes
Iscia Lopes-Cendes State University of Campinas
Niels C. Danbolt
Niels C. Danbolt University of Oslo
Tracy K. McIntosh
Tracy K. McIntosh Media NeuroConsultants

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and future careers. Many students opt to combine neuroscience studies with advanced psychology programs, such as online psych d programs, to deepen their clinical expertise and expand their career opportunities.

Those interested in therapy or counseling might pursue mft online programs, specializing in marriage and family therapy. These pathways allow students to build vital skills for work in both clinical and research settings, often from the flexibility of home.

For learners seeking a faster route to the workforce, accelerated degrees online are an excellent option. These programs compress coursework and help you earn a degree in less time—a smart choice for those eager to start their careers sooner.

Finally, if you are looking to maximize your earning potential, reviewing the best bachelor degrees by salary can help inform your academic path. No matter your direction, these related online options provide diverse and flexible pathways to rewarding neuroscience-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Alan S. Hazell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles