World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
41963
World Ranking
7908
National Ranking
4115

Frederick L. Grover publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Grover sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 395 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederick L. Grover D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick L. Grover sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Distinguished Fellowship Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)
  • 1971 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Frederick L. Grover is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States and focuses on research in the field of Medicine with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. Their work spans topics such as cardiac surgery techniques, surgical outcomes, and health systems evaluations.

Grover's research output includes 25 publications in Medicine, with notable concentration in 15 papers related to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 8 in Surgery. Subfield contributions also extend to Economics and Econometrics, Biomedical Engineering, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The scientist's main topics of study cover:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Frederick L. Grover has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Vessel Plus
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • JAMA Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Recent papers include:

  • Ten-Year Outcomes of Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Department of Veterans Affairs, 2022, JAMA Surgery
  • Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Transit Time Flow Measurement: Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Incomplete Revascularization Documented by Coronary Angiography 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, 2020, The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Factors associated with long-term survival in patients with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting, 2020, Journal of International Medical Research

Among frequent co-authors, Grover has collaborated with:

  • A. Laurie Shroyer (10 collaborations)
  • Jacquelyn A. Quin (5 collaborations)
  • Joseph F. Collins (5 collaborations)
  • Brack Hattler (4 collaborations)
  • G. Hossein Almassi (4 collaborations)

Frederick L. Grover has received the Distinguished Fellowship Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 2011 and was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1971.

Best Publications

  • The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

    S F Khuri;J Daley;W Henderson;K Hur

  • Independent Association between Acute Renal Failure and Mortality following Cardiac Surgery

    Glenn M Chertow;Elliott M Levy;Karl E Hammermeister;Frederick Grover

  • Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.

    Karl Hammermeister;Gulshan K Sethi;William G Henderson;Frederick L Grover

  • On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery

    A. Laurie Shroyer;Frederick L. Grover;Brack Hattler;Joseph F. Collins

  • Preoperative Renal Risk Stratification

    G M Chertow;J M Lazarus;C L Christiansen;E F Cook

  • American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

    Christopher P Cannon;Alexander Battler;Ralph G Brindis;Jafna L Cox

  • Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Major Morbid Event?

    G. Almassi;Tracey Schowalter;Alfred Nicolosi;Anil Aggarwal

  • A decade of change—risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute

    T.Bruce Ferguson;Bradley G Hammill;Eric D Peterson;Elizabeth R DeLong

  • Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery

    Samer A.M. Nashef;Francois Roques;Bradley G. Hammill;Eric D. Peterson

  • Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States.

    T. M. Egan;S. Murray;R. T. Bustami;T. H. Shearon

  • Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care : Results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study

    Daley J;Khuri Sf;Henderson W;Hur K

  • The society of thoracic surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models

    A.Laurie W Shroyer;Laura P Coombs;Eric D Peterson;Mary C Eiken

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies

    William S. Weintraub;Maria V. Grau-Sepulveda;Jocelyn M. Weiss;Sean M. O'Brien

  • 2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

    Frederick L Grover;Sreekanth Vemulapalli;John D Carroll;Fred H Edwards

  • Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity

    Joseph C Cleveland;A.Laurie W Shroyer;A.Laurie W Shroyer;Anita Y Chen;Eric Peterson

  • Health-Related Quality of Life as a Predictor of Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

    J. S. Rumsfeld;S. Mawhinney;M. Mccarthy;A. L. W. Shroyer

  • Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery

    Fred H Edwards;Eric D Peterson;Laura P Coombs;Elizabeth R DeLong

  • Impact of Gender on Coronary Bypass Operative Mortality

    Fred H. Edwards;Joseph S. Carey;Frederick L. Grover;Joseph W. Bero

  • Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.

    Michael J. Mack;J. Matthew Brennan;Ralph Brindis;John Carroll

  • ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

    Manesh R. Patel;Gregory J. Dehmer;John W. Hirshfeld;Peter K. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred H. Edwards
Fred H. Edwards University of Florida
David M. Shahian
David M. Shahian Harvard University
Sean M. O'Brien
Sean M. O'Brien Duke University
William G. Henderson
William G. Henderson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
John S. Rumsfeld
John S. Rumsfeld University of Colorado Denver
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Jeffrey P. Jacobs University of Florida
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. Mack Scott & White Memorial Hospital
E. Murat Tuzcu
E. Murat Tuzcu Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those exploring alternatives or complementary paths to a traditional medical degree in the USA, there are many flexible online programs that open doors to rewarding health careers.

Many nurses consider online DNP programs to advance quickly into high-level clinical or leadership roles while balancing work and study. If you’re looking for a quicker entry point, you might explore what is the fastest way to become an LPN, which can get you working in patient care faster than traditional routes.

Specialization is also possible through accelerated graduate pathways. For example, consider the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program if you’re interested in mental health care and want to make an impact quickly.

If you prefer to shape healthcare from behind the scenes, a management degree might be right for you. For a cost-effective route, review the options for a healthcare administration degree cost and see how you can lead in healthcare without a clinical background.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick L. Grover

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles