World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
27420
World Ranking
16013
National Ranking
8058

Fred H. Edwards publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred H. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 204 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Fred H. Edwards D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred H. Edwards sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred H. Edwards is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work spans several interrelated topics including Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Hip and Femur Fractures, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches, and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Vinod H. Thourani, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, David M. Shahian, Sharif Halim, and David Dai.

Publications by Fred H. Edwards have appeared in venues such as Circulation, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, and the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Recent papers include:

  • Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, 2020, Circulation
  • Failure to Rescue: A New Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Metric for Cardiac Surgery, 2021, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Commentary: Failure to rescue: What does it really measure?, 2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Best Publications

  • 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Document on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    David R. Holmes;Michael J. Mack;Sanjay Kaul;Arvind Agnihotri

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.

    Sean M. O'Brien;David M. Shahian;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to update the 1999 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery)

    Kim A. Eagle;Robert A. Guyton;Ravin Davidoff;Fred H. Edwards

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

    David M. Shahian;Sean M. O'Brien;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • The society of thoracic surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models

    A.Laurie W Shroyer;Laura P Coombs;Eric D Peterson;Mary C Eiken

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies

    William S. Weintraub;Maria V. Grau-Sepulveda;Jocelyn M. Weiss;Sean M. O'Brien

  • An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery.

    Sean M. O'Brien;David R. Clarke;Jeffrey P. Jacobs;Marshall L. Jacobs

  • 2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

    Frederick L Grover;Sreekanth Vemulapalli;John D Carroll;Fred H Edwards

  • CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: THE SOCIETY OF THORACIC SURGEONS NATIONAL DATABASE EXPERIENCE

    Fred H. Edwards;Richard E. Clark;Marc Schwartz

  • Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery

    Fred H Edwards;Eric D Peterson;Laura P Coombs;Elizabeth R DeLong

  • Impact of Gender on Coronary Bypass Operative Mortality

    Fred H. Edwards;Joseph S. Carey;Frederick L. Grover;Joseph W. Bero

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: Antibiotic choice.

    Richard Engelman;David Shahian;Richard Shemin;T. Sloane Guy

  • Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.

    Michael J. Mack;J. Matthew Brennan;Ralph Brindis;John Carroll

  • Clinical Outcomes at 1 Year Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    David R. Holmes;J. Matthew Brennan;John S. Rumsfeld;David Dai

  • Primary cardiac valve tumors.

    Fred H. Edwards;Fred H. Edwards;Fred H. Edwards;Douglas Hale;Douglas Hale;Douglas Hale;Amram Cohen;Amram Cohen;Amram Cohen;Lenardo Thompson;Lenardo Thompson;Lenardo Thompson

  • Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery.

    J. Scott Rankin;Bradley G. Hammill;Bradley G. Hammill;T. Bruce Ferguson;Donald D. Glower

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2-Statistical Methods and Results

    Sean M. O’Brien;Liqi Feng;Xia He;Ying Xian

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part I: Duration

    Fred H. Edwards;Richard M. Engelman;Peter Houck;David M. Shahian

  • Risk stratification for cardiac valve replacement. National cardiac surgery database

    W.R.Eric Jamieson;Fred H. Edwards;Marc Schwartz;Joseph W. Bero

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database: Current Risk Assessment

    F. H. Edwards;F. L. Grover;A. L. W. Shroyer;M. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Shahian
David M. Shahian Harvard University
Sean M. O'Brien
Sean M. O'Brien Duke University
Frederick L. Grover
Frederick L. Grover University of Colorado Denver
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Jeffrey P. Jacobs University of Florida
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. Mack Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Vinod H. Thourani
Vinod H. Thourani Georgetown University
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Elizabeth R. DeLong
Elizabeth R. DeLong Duke University
William S. Weintraub
William S. Weintraub Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of healthcare careers, many of which can begin or advance through online education. Affordable online nursing programs have made it possible for students nationwide to start a career in nursing without the high up-front costs or the need to relocate.

For those already holding an RN license, the most affordable accredited online RN to BSN programs offer a flexible path to career advancement. These programs can often be completed part-time, helping working nurses earn their degree while balancing professional duties.

If you’re considering advanced practice or leadership roles, a PhD in nursing gained through online study can open opportunities in research, teaching, and clinical leadership.

Even non-nurses can transition into healthcare with online direct entry MSN programs for non-nurses, providing a streamlined pathway into the profession. These flexible options make entering and advancing in healthcare more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Fred H. Edwards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles