World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth R. DeLong

Elizabeth R. DeLong

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
61578
World Ranking
16356
National Ranking
8226

Elizabeth R. DeLong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth R. DeLong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 205 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elizabeth R. DeLong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth R. DeLong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth R. DeLong is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Mathematics, with a focused subfield in Statistics and Probability.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

A significant publication by this researcher is titled "Empirical use of causal inference methods to evaluate survival differences in a real-world registry vs those found in randomized clinical trials", published in 2020 in the journal Statistics in Medicine.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Hui-Jie Lee
  • John B. Wong
  • Beilin Jia
  • Xinyue Qi
  • Andrea J. Cook

Elizabeth R. DeLong's work has appeared predominantly in Statistics in Medicine, which is noted as a frequent publication venue for their research output.

Best Publications

  • Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

    Elizabeth R. DeLong;David M. DeLong;Daniel L. Clarke-Pearson

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.

    Sean M. O'Brien;David M. Shahian;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

    David M. Shahian;Sean M. O'Brien;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • A decade of change—risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute

    T.Bruce Ferguson;Bradley G Hammill;Eric D Peterson;Elizabeth R DeLong

  • Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems: Implications for Outcomes Research

    James G. Jollis;Marek Ancukiewicz;Elizabeth R. DeLong;David B. Pryor

  • Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes.

    Eric D. Peterson;Matthew T. Roe;Jyotsna Mulgund;Elizabeth R. DeLong

  • The society of thoracic surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models

    A.Laurie W Shroyer;Laura P Coombs;Eric D Peterson;Mary C Eiken

  • Racial Variation in the Use of Coronary-Revascularization Procedures — Are the Differences Real? Do They Matter?

    Eric D. Peterson;Linda K. Shaw;Elizabeth R. DeLong;David B. Pryor

  • Long-Term Adherence to Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Therapies in Coronary Artery Disease

    L. Kristin Newby;Nancy M. Allen LaPointe;Anita Y. Chen;Judith M. Kramer

  • Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery

    Fred H Edwards;Eric D Peterson;Laura P Coombs;Elizabeth R DeLong

  • Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction According to the Specialty of the Admitting Physician

    James G. Jollis;Elizabeth R. DeLong;Eric D. Peterson;Lawrence H. Muhlbaier

  • Association between pulse pressure and mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

    Preston S. Klassen;Edmund G. Lowrie;Donal N. Reddan;Elizabeth R. DeLong

  • Contemporary Mortality Risk Prediction for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from 588,398 Procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

    Eric D. Peterson;David Dai;Elizabeth R. DeLong;J. Matthew Brennan

  • A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study.

    David M. DeLong;Elizabeth R. DeLong;Peter D. Wood;Kenneth Lippel

  • Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

    Seth W. Glickman;Fang Shu Ou;Elizabeth R. DeLong;Matthew T. Roe

  • Procedural volume as a marker of quality for cabg surgery

    Eric D. Peterson;Laura P. Coombs;Elizabeth R. DeLong;Constance K. Haan

  • Relationship between diabetes mellitus and long-term survival after coronary bypass and angioplasty

    Gregory W. Barsness;Eric D. Peterson;E. Magnus Ohman;Charlotte L. Nelson

  • Use of a Prognostic Treadmill Score in Identifying Diagnostic Coronary Disease Subgroups

    Leslee J. Shaw;Eric D. Peterson;Linda K. Shaw;Karen L. Kesler

  • The Relation between the Volume of Coronary Angioplasty Procedures at Hospitals Treating Medicare Beneficiaries and Short-Term Mortality

    J. G. Jollis;E. D. Peterson;E. R. Delong;D. B. Mark

  • Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery.

    J. Scott Rankin;Bradley G. Hammill;Bradley G. Hammill;T. Bruce Ferguson;Donald D. Glower

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Sean M. O'Brien
Sean M. O'Brien Duke University
Fred H. Edwards
Fred H. Edwards University of Florida
David M. Shahian
David M. Shahian Harvard University
Matthew T. Roe
Matthew T. Roe Duke University
Frederick L. Grover
Frederick L. Grover University of Colorado Denver
E. Magnus Ohman
E. Magnus Ohman Duke University
William S. Weintraub
William S. Weintraub Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and healthcare career paths. For aspiring nurses, affordability is a top concern. Many seek out the cheapest bsn programs as a practical next step after earning an RN. These programs allow working nurses to advance their education without steep tuition costs.

If you’re considering a fast-track into nursing, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses may be an ideal fit. These programs are designed for students with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree who want to move directly into nursing leadership or advanced practice roles.

For those wanting a quicker entry into healthcare, the adn programs offer an accessible route to become a registered nurse. These programs generally have fewer prerequisites and a shorter timeframe compared to traditional paths.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. Students interested in the administrative side can explore medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid. These online options provide flexible study and are ideal for those seeking a vital healthcare role without clinical duties.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth R. DeLong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles