World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4940
World Ranking
10886
National Ranking
4527

Miriah Meyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriah Meyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 80 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Miriah Meyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriah Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriah Meyer is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and works primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their body of work spans several subfields, including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The main topics represented in their research involve Data Visualization and Analytics, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Video Analysis and Summarization, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Big Data and Business Intelligence, and Species Distribution and Climate Change.

Miriah Meyer has published numerous papers in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, where they have contributed 13 papers, arXiv (Cornell University) with 3 publications, Environmental Science & Technology, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, and Environmental Research.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Miriah Meyer are:

  • "Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes," 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Patterns of distributive environmental inequity under different PM2.5 air pollution scenarios for Salt Lake County public schools," 2020, Environmental Research
  • "Network Architecture of Gap Junctional Coupling among Parallel Processing Channels in the Mammalian Retina," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Data Hunches: Incorporating Personal Knowledge into Visualizations," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "HyperLabels: Browsing of Dense and Hierarchical Molecular 3D Models," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Collaborative work features frequent coauthors, such as Derya Akbaba (7 joint works), James Ahrens (6 joint works), Alexander Lex (4 joint works), Haihan Lin (3 joint works), and Kerry E. Kelly (3 joint works).

Best Publications

  • Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks

    M. Sedlmair;M. Meyer;T. Munzner

  • Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment

    Manfred G. Grabherr;Pamela Russell;Miriah Meyer;Evan Mauceli

  • MizBee: A Multiscale Synteny Browser

    M. Meyer;T. Munzner;H. Pfister

  • Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias

    Greg J. McInerny;Greg J. McInerny;Min Chen;Robin Freeman;David Gavaghan

  • Criteria for Rigor in Visualization Design Study

    Miriah Meyer;Jason Dykes

  • Design Activity Framework for Visualization Design

    Sean McKenna;Dominika Mazur;James Agutter;Miriah D. Meyer

  • The State of the Art in Visualizing Multivariate Networks

    Carolina Nobre;Miriah D. Meyer;Marc Streit;Alexander Lex

  • Robust particle systems for curvature dependent sampling of implicit surfaces

    M.D. Meyer;P. Georgel;R.T. Whitaker

  • Visual Narrative Flow: Exploring Factors Shaping Data Visualization Story Reading Experiences

    S. McKenna;S. McKenna;N. Henry Riche;B. Lee;J. Boy

  • Reflections on how designers design with data

    Alex Bigelow;Steven Drucker;Danyel Fisher;Miriah Meyer

  • The nested blocks and guidelines model

    Miriah D. Meyer;Michael Sedlmair;P. Samuel Quinan;Tamara Munzner

  • Pathline: a tool for comparative functional genomics

    M. Meyer;B. Wong;M. Styczynski;T. Munzner

  • Unlocking user-centered design methods for building cyber security visualizations

    Sean Mckenna;Diane Staheli;Miriah Meyer

  • Poemage: Visualizing the Sonic Topology of a Poem

    Nina McCurdy;Julie Lein;Katharine Coles;Miriah Meyer

  • Aggregate gaze visualization with real-time heatmaps

    Andrew T. Duchowski;Margaux M. Price;Miriah Meyer;Pilar Orero

  • MulteeSum: A Tool for Comparative Spatial and Temporal Gene Expression Data

    M Meyer;T Munzner;A DePace;H Pfister

  • BubbleNet: A Cyber Security Dashboard for Visualizing Patterns

    S. McKenna;D. Staheli;C. Fulcher;M. Meyer

  • Rule-based visual mappings - with a case study on poetry visualization

    A. Abdul-Rahman;J. Lein;K. Coles;E. Maguire

  • Visually Comparing Weather Features in Forecasts

    P. Samuel Quinan;Miriah Meyer

  • A Framework for Creative Visualization-Opportunities Workshops

    Ethan Kerzner;Sarah Goodwin;Jason Dykes;Sara Jones

  • Entropy-Based Particle Systems for Shape Correspondence

    Joshua Cates;Miriah Meyer;Thomas Fletcher;Ross Whitaker

  • Particle-based Sampling and Meshing of Surfaces in Multimaterial Volumes

    M. Meyer;R. Whitaker;R.M. Kirby;C. Ledergerber

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Kirby
Robert M. Kirby University of Utah
Tamara Munzner
Tamara Munzner University of British Columbia
Ross T. Whitaker
Ross T. Whitaker University of Utah
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Jason Dykes
Jason Dykes City, University of London
Robert E. Marc
Robert E. Marc University of Utah
Danyel Fisher
Danyel Fisher Microsoft (United States)
Michael B. Eisen
Michael B. Eisen University of California, Berkeley
Neal Patwari
Neal Patwari Washington University in St. Louis
Chris R. Johnson
Chris R. Johnson University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Computer Science, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Many universities now offer flexible, affordable programs that can help you expand your expertise or branch into emerging fields—all from the comfort of home.

For those keen on sustainability and technology, an environmental engineering degree online can open doors to careers focused on solving critical environmental challenges. Alternatively, an online degree for mechanical engineering provides the skills needed for design and innovation across industries like automotive, aerospace, and manufacturing.

If physics interests you, pursuing an online physics degree can help you build a strong analytical and research foundation, essential for careers in research, technology, and engineering. In the rapidly growing tech sector, a data science degree can set you up for roles in AI, analytics, and machine learning.

By considering related degrees, you can broaden your career options and gain specialized skills that are highly valued in today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Miriah Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles