World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
16589
World Ranking
4857
National Ranking
211

Christine Delire publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Delire sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christine Delire D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Delire sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christine Delire is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, ecology, soil science, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Peatlands and wetlands ecology
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics

Christine Delire has contributed to publications in frequent venues such as:

  • Biogeosciences
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Research Square

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • The Global Land Carbon Cycle Simulated With ISBA-CTRIP: Improvements Over the Last Decade, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • Global climate response to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • Tripling of western US particulate pollution from wildfires in a warming climate, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Soil carbon sequestration simulated in CMIP6-LUMIP models: implications for climatic mitigation, 2020, Environmental Research Letters

Frequent co-authors in Christine Delire's collaborations include:

  • Bertrand Decharme
  • Victor Brovkin
  • Émilie Joetzjer
  • David M. Lawrence
  • Roland Séférian

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation.

    G. Bala;K. Caldeira;M. Wickett;T. J. Phillips

  • Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure

    Christopher J. Kucharik;Jonathan A. Foley;Christine Delire;Veronica A. Fisher

  • The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes

    V. Masson;P. Le Moigne;E. Martin;S. Faroux

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study

    A. J. Pitman;N. de Noblet-Ducoudré;F. T. Cruz;E. L. Davin;E. L. Davin

  • Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models

    Vivek K. Arora;Anna Katavouta;Anna Katavouta;Richard G. Williams;Chris D. Jones

  • Green surprise? How terrestrial ecosystems could affect earth’s climate

    Jonathan A. Foley;Marcos Heil Costa;Christine Delire;Navin Ramankutty

  • Determining Robust Impacts of Land-Use-Induced Land Cover Changes on Surface Climate over North America and Eurasia: Results from the First Set of LUCID Experiments

    N de Noblet-Ducoudre;J.P. Boisier;A. Pitman;G.B. Bonan

  • Evaluating the influence of different vegetation biomes on the global climate

    Peter K Snyder;C. Delire;J. A. Foley

  • Recent Changes in the ISBA‐CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM‐CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off‐Line Hydrological Applications

    Bertrand Decharme;Christine Delire;Marie Minvielle;Jeanne Colin

  • Early stage litter decomposition across biomes

    Ika Djukic;Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas;Inger Kappel Schmidt;Klaus Steenberg Larsen

  • Climate change impacts on tree ranges: model intercomparison facilitates understanding and quantification of uncertainty

    Alissar Cheaib;Vincent Badeau;Julien Boe;Isabelle Chuine

  • Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions

    B. Decharme;A. Boone;C. Delire;J. Noilhan

  • The AMMA Land Surface Model Intercomparison Project (ALMIP)

    Aaron Boone;Patricia de Rosnay;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anton Beljaars

  • Present-day and future Amazonian precipitation in global climate models: CMIP5 versus CMIP3

    E. Joetzjer;H. Douville;C. Delire;P. Ciais

  • Impacts of snow and organic soils parameterization on northern Eurasian soil temperature profiles simulated by the ISBA land surface model

    Bertrand Decharme;Eric Brun;Aaron Boone;Christine Delire

  • Attributing the impacts of land-cover changes in temperate regions on surface temperature and heat fluxes to specific causes: Results from the first LUCID set of simulations

    J. P. Boisier;N. de Noblet-Ducoudré;A. J. Pitman;F. T. Cruz

  • Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

    A. David McGuire;Charles Koven;David M. Lawrence;Joy S. Clein

  • The Global Land Carbon Cycle Simulated With ISBA-CTRIP: Improvements Over the Last Decade

    Christine Delire;Roland Séférian;Bertrand Decharme;Ramdane Alkama

  • Evaluating the performance of a land Surface / ecosystem model with biophysical measurements from contrasting environments

    Christine Delire;Jonathan A. Foley

Frequent Co-Authors

Bertrand Decharme
Bertrand Decharme Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Annette Rinke
Annette Rinke Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jean-Christophe Calvet
Jean-Christophe Calvet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ramdane Alkama
Ramdane Alkama Joint Research Center
Jonathan A. Foley
Jonathan A. Foley University of Minnesota
Shushi Peng
Shushi Peng Peking University
David M. Lawrence
David M. Lawrence National Center for Atmospheric Research
Gerhard Krinner
Gerhard Krinner Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Aurore Voldoire
Aurore Voldoire Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Ken Caldeira
Ken Caldeira Carnegie Institution for Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide flexible and affordable education options. A low cost online general studies degree offers a practical foundation for those looking to keep expenses minimal while gaining broad knowledge applicable to various environmental fields.

Some students may seek programs that balance rigor with accessibility. According to insights on the easiest bachelors degree, degrees in general studies or similar fields might provide a smoother pathway for those new to complex scientific subjects.

More specialized degrees like a geology online degree offer focused expertise beneficial for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, or conservation. This technical knowledge is increasingly in demand as environmental challenges grow.

Additionally, programs in Geographic Information Systems are vital for analyzing spatial data related to the environment. Identifying the best GIS programs in the US can help students access top-tier education and open doors to careers in mapping, urban planning, and environmental monitoring.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Delire

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles