World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
12315
World Ranking
4195
National Ranking
169

Aaron Boone publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Boone sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Aaron Boone D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron Boone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aaron Boone is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France and has contributed extensively to research within the domains of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work primarily addresses topics related to climate variability, cryospheric studies, plant water relations, meteorological phenomena, and hydrological processes.

The main fields of study for Boone include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

In terms of subfields, Boone's research spans:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Soil Science

The scientist has focused on several key research topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

Boone's recent papers illustrate a steady engagement with current environmental challenges and modeling techniques. Notable publications include:

  • "Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios" (2020), Earth-Science Reviews
  • "Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison" (2020), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Toward Snow Cover Estimation in Mountainous Areas Using Modern Data Assimilation Methods: A Review" (2020), Frontiers in Earth Science
  • "The latest improvements with SURFEX v8.0 of the Safran-Isba-Modcou hydrometeorological model for France" (2020), Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Impact of Initialized Land Surface Temperature and Snowpack on Subseasonal to Seasonal Prediction Project, Phase I (LS4P-I): organization and experimental design" (2021), Geoscientific Model Development

Boone frequently publishes in several key scientific venues, including:

  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology

Collaboration is a significant element of Boone's research approach. Common co-authors include:

  • Michel Le Page
  • Patrick Le Moigne
  • Lionel Jarlan
  • Mehrez Zribi
  • Matthieu Lafaysse

Best Publications

  • The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes

    V. Masson;P. Le Moigne;E. Martin;S. Faroux

  • The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2

    V. Vionnet;E. Brun;S. Morin;A. Boone

  • Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios

    Yves Tramblay;Aristeidis Koutroulis;Luis Samaniego;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano

  • Evaluation of forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2)

    Nick Rutter;Richard Essery;John Pomeroy;Nuria Altimir

  • The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

    A. G. Slater;A. G. Slater;C. A. Schlosser;C. E. Desborough;A. J. Pitman

  • The SAFRAN‐ISBA‐MODCOU hydrometeorological model applied over France

    F. Habets;F. Habets;A. Boone;J. L. Champeaux;P. Etchevers

  • An Intercomparison of Three Snow Schemes of Varying Complexity Coupled to the Same Land Surface Model: Local-Scale Evaluation at an Alpine Site

    Aaron Boone;Pierre Etchevers

  • Validation of the energy budget of an alpine snowpack simulated by several snow models (SnowMIP project)

    Pierre Etchevers;Eric Martin;Ross Brown;Charles Fierz

  • The Plumbing of Land Surface Models: Benchmarking Model Performance

    M.J. Best;G. Abramowitz;H.R. Johnson;A.J. Pitman

  • The Rhône-Aggregation Land Surface Scheme Intercomparison Project: An Overview

    Aaron A. Boone;F. Habets;J. Noilhan;D. Clark

  • Inclusion of a Third Soil Layer in a Land Surface Scheme Using the Force–Restore Method

    Aaron Boone;Jean-Christophe Calvet;Joël Noilhan

  • The Influence of the Inclusion of Soil Freezing on Simulations by a Soil–Vegetation–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme

    Aaron Boone;V. Masson;T. Meyers;J. Noilhan

  • Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS phase 2(d).

    C. Adam Schlosser;Andrew G. Slater;Alan Robock;Andrew J. Pitman

  • Land surface coupling in regional climate simulations of the West African monsoon

    Allison L. Steiner;Jeremy S. Pal;Sara A. Rauscher;Jason L. Bell

  • Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions

    B. Decharme;A. Boone;C. Delire;J. Noilhan

  • Simulation of Northern Eurasian Local Snow Depth, Mass, and Density Using a Detailed Snowpack Model and Meteorological Reanalyses

    Eric Brun;Vincent Vionnet;Aaron Boone;Bertrand Decharme

  • Effects of frozen soil on soil temperature, spring infiltration, and runoff: Results from the PILPS 2(d) experiment at Valdai, Russia

    Lifeng Luo;Alan Robock;Konstantin Y. Vinnikov;C. Adam Schlosser

  • The AMMA Land Surface Model Intercomparison Project (ALMIP)

    Aaron Boone;Patricia de Rosnay;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anton Beljaars

  • ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

    Gerhard Krinner;Chris Derksen;Richard Essery;Mark Flanner

  • Intercomparison and analyses of the climatology of the West African Monsoon in the West African Monsoon Modeling and Evaluation project (WAMME) first model intercomparison experiment

    Yongkang Xue;Fernando De Sales;W. K.-M. Lau;Aaron Boone

Frequent Co-Authors

Bertrand Decharme
Bertrand Decharme Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Yongkang Xue
Yongkang Xue University of California, Los Angeles
Eric Martin
Eric Martin Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Florence Habets
Florence Habets École Normale Supérieure
Françoise Guichard
Françoise Guichard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Lionel Jarlan
Lionel Jarlan Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Christine Delire
Christine Delire Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Christophe Calvet
Jean-Christophe Calvet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Patrick Samuelsson
Patrick Samuelsson Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Agnès Ducharne
Agnès Ducharne Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals opt for interdisciplinary programs to complement their environmental expertise. For example, pursuing an eds to edd bridge program is ideal for those aiming to move into educational leadership roles within environmental education.

For individuals focused on social impact within environmental fields, affordable options like the cheapest dsw program offer advanced training. These programs equip graduates with skills to drive policy and community initiatives related to sustainability and social justice.

Some students may prefer flexible and cost-effective pathways, such as the most affordable online general studies degree programs, which allow customizing coursework to include environmental science subjects alongside other areas of interest.

Additionally, those new to the field or seeking a straightforward degree might consider the easiest bachelor's degree options online. These programs can facilitate a smooth transition into environmental careers while balancing work or other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron Boone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles