World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
15661
World Ranking
2315
National Ranking
86

Bertrand Decharme publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertrand Decharme sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Bertrand Decharme D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertrand Decharme sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bertrand Decharme is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research work is situated primarily within the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a substantial focus on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Additional subfields of study include Water Science and Technology, Oceanography, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

Their research addresses a range of topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Bertrand Decharme has contributed to several scientific publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Global Carbon Budget 2021," published in 2022 in Earth System Science Data
  • "Global Carbon Budget 2023," published in 2023 in Earth System Science Data
  • "Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change," published in 2020 in Nature Geoscience
  • "Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison," published in 2020 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE-Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation," published in 2020 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Frequent coauthors of Bertrand Decharme include Jeanne Colin, Christine Delire, Simon Munier, Aaron Boone, and Chris Derksen.

The scientist publishes regularly in several venues, including:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Earth System Science Data
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific Model Development

Best Publications

  • The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation

    A. Voldoire;E. Sanchez-Gomez;D. Salas y Mélia;B. Decharme

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM-CM6-1

    A. Voldoire;D. Saint‐Martin;S. Sénési;B. Decharme

  • The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes

    V. Masson;P. Le Moigne;E. Martin;S. Faroux

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • The rate of sea-level rise

    Anny Cazenave;Habib-Boubacar Dieng;Benoit Meyssignac;Karina von Schuckmann

  • Recent Changes in the ISBA‐CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM‐CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off‐Line Hydrological Applications

    Bertrand Decharme;Christine Delire;Marie Minvielle;Jeanne Colin

  • The Plumbing of Land Surface Models: Benchmarking Model Performance

    M.J. Best;G. Abramowitz;H.R. Johnson;A.J. Pitman

  • Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change

    Ryan S. Padrón;Lukas Gudmundsson;Bertrand Decharme;Agnès Ducharne

  • A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: The eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset

    Jaap Schellekens;Emanuel Dutra;Emanuel Dutra;Alberto Martínez-de la Torre;Gianpaolo Balsamo

  • Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions

    B. Decharme;A. Boone;C. Delire;J. Noilhan

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Anthropogenic influence on multidecadal changes in reconstructed global evapotranspiration

    H. Douville;A. Ribes;B. Decharme;R. Alkama

  • Simulation of Northern Eurasian Local Snow Depth, Mass, and Density Using a Detailed Snowpack Model and Meteorological Reanalyses

    Eric Brun;Vincent Vionnet;Aaron Boone;Bertrand Decharme

  • The AMMA Land Surface Model Intercomparison Project (ALMIP)

    Aaron Boone;Patricia de Rosnay;Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anton Beljaars

  • ESM-SnowMIP: assessing snow models and quantifying snow-related climate feedbacks

    Gerhard Krinner;Chris Derksen;Richard Essery;Mark Flanner

  • Impacts of snow and organic soils parameterization on northern Eurasian soil temperature profiles simulated by the ISBA land surface model

    Bertrand Decharme;Eric Brun;Aaron Boone;Christine Delire

  • Global off-line evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP flood model

    B. Decharme;R. Alkama;F. Papa;F. Papa;S. Faroux

  • Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

    A. David McGuire;Charles Koven;David M. Lawrence;Joy S. Clein

  • Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison

    Cecile B. Menard;Richard Essery;Gerhard Krinner;Gabriele Arduini

  • Global Evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP Continental Hydrological System. Part II: Uncertainties in River Routing Simulation Related to Flow Velocity and Groundwater Storage

    B. Decharme;R. Alkama;H. Douville;M. Becker

  • A new river flooding scheme for global climate applications: Off-line evaluation over South America

    B. Decharme;H. Douville;C. Prigent;F. Papa

Frequent Co-Authors

Hervé Douville
Hervé Douville Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Ramdane Alkama
Ramdane Alkama Joint Research Center
Christine Delire
Christine Delire Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Aurore Voldoire
Aurore Voldoire Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Aaron Boone
Aaron Boone Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Christophe Calvet
Jean-Christophe Calvet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gerhard Krinner
Gerhard Krinner Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Agnès Ducharne
Agnès Ducharne Sorbonne University
Annette Rinke
Annette Rinke Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Roland Séférian
Roland Séférian Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. If you’re seeking a degree with a balance of interest and manageability, consider looking into the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get to find programs that complement your learning style and goals.

Geology is a natural extension of Environmental Sciences, and pursuing an online geology degree can deepen your understanding of Earth systems. This knowledge is valuable for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and conservation.

Another valuable skill set lies in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), crucial for environmental mapping and spatial analysis. Exploring the best gis graduate programs can equip you with advanced technical capabilities that enhance career prospects in environmental planning and policy.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration can be a strategic choice. Discovering the best online mpa programs offers a fast track to leadership roles in government and nonprofits focused on sustainability and environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Bertrand Decharme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles