World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
5265
World Ranking
6888
National Ranking
2451

Richard C. Miake-Lye publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Miake-Lye sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 127 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Richard C. Miake-Lye D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Miake-Lye sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard C. Miake-Lye is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with a strong emphasis on understanding particulate matter emissions from aircraft engines and evaluating sustainable aviation fuels.

Their work spans several subfields including global and planetary change, automotive engineering, health toxicology and mutagenesis, materials chemistry, and aerospace engineering. Core research topics include advanced aircraft design and technologies, vehicle emissions and performance, air quality and health impacts, catalytic processes in materials science, air traffic management and optimization, advanced combustion engine technologies, and recycling and waste management techniques.

They have published in multiple venues, notably:

  • Journal of Aerosol Science
  • Aerosol Science and Technology
  • Meteorologische Zeitschrift
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Fuel

Frequent collaborators include Prem Lobo, Gregory J. Smallwood, Zhenhong Yu, Andrew Freedman, and Philip D. Whitefield, with multiple joint publications across their careers.

Representative recent papers with publication years and venues include:

  • Aircraft engine particulate matter emissions from sustainable aviation fuels: Results from ground-based measurements during the NASA/DLR campaign ECLIF2/ND-MAX, 2022, Fuel
  • Comparison of standardized sampling and measurement reference systems for aircraft engine non-volatile particulate matter emissions, 2020, Journal of Aerosol Science
  • Aircraft-engine particulate matter emissions from conventional and sustainable aviation fuel combustion: comparison of measurement techniques for mass, number, and size, 2022, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Assessment of a regulatory measurement system for the determination of the non-volatile particulate matter emissions from commercial aircraft engines, 2020, Journal of Aerosol Science
  • A New Approach to Estimate Particulate Matter Emissions From Ground Certification Data: The nvPM Mission Emissions Estimation Methodology, 2022, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

Best Publications

  • Emission Measurements of the Concorde Supersonic Aircraft in the Lower Stratosphere

    D. W. Fahey;E. R. Keim;K. A. Boering;C. A. Brock

  • Impact of aviation on climate: FAA’s Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative (ACCRI) Phase II

    Guy P. Brasseur;Mohan Gupta;Bruce E. Anderson;Sathya Balasubramanian

  • Aerosol dynamics in near‐field aircraft plumes

    R. C. Brown;R. C. Miake-Lye;M. R. Anderson;C. E. Kolb

  • Commercial aircraft engine emissions characterization of in-use aircraft at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.

    Scott Christopher Herndon;John T. Jayne;Prem Lobo;Timothy B. Onasch

  • Environmental conditions required for contrail formation and persistence

    Eric J. Jensen;Owen B. Toon;Stefan Kinne;Glen W. Sachse

  • Measurement of aircraft engine non-volatile PM emissions: results of the Aviation-Particle Regulatory Instrumentation Demonstration Experiment (A-PRIDE) 4 campaign

    Prem Lobo;Lukas Durdina;Gregory J. Smallwood;Theodor Rindlisbacher

  • Gas Turbine Engine Emissions—Part II: Chemical Properties of Particulate Matter

    Michael T. Timko;Timothy B. Onasch;Megan J. Northway;John T. Jayne

  • Lifted turbulent jet flames: A stability criterion based on the jet large-scale structure

    Unknown

  • Reductions in aircraft particulate emissions due to the use of Fischer–Tropsch fuels

    A. J. Beyersdorf;M. T. Timko;L. D. Ziemba;D. Bulzan

  • NO and NO2 emission ratios measured from in-use commercial aircraft during taxi and takeoff.

    Scott C. Herndon;Joanne H. Shorter;Mark S. Zahniser;David D. Nelson

  • Chemical Properties of Aircraft Engine Particulate Exhaust Emissions

    Timothy B. Onasch;John T. Jayne;Scott Herndon;Douglas R. Worsnop

  • Overview on the Aircraft Particle Emissions Experiment

    Chowen C. Wey;Bruce E. Anderson;Changlie Wey;Richard Charles Miake-Lye

  • Particulate Emissions of Gas Turbine Engine Combustion of a Fischer−Tropsch Synthetic Fuel

    M. T. Timko;Z. Yu;T. B. Onasch;H.-W. Wong

  • In situ observations in aircraft exhaust plumes in the lower stratosphere at midlatitudes

    D. W. Fahey;E. R. Keim;E. L. Woodbridge;R. S. Gao

  • Influence of Jet Fuel Composition on Aircraft Engine Emissions: A Synthesis of Aerosol Emissions Data from the NASA APEX, AAFEX, and ACCESS Missions

    Richard H. Moore;Michael Shook;Andreas Beyersdorf;Chelsea Corr;Chelsea Corr

  • Hydrocarbon Emissions from In-Use Commercial Aircraft during Airport Operations

    Scott C. Herndon;Todd Rogers;Edward J. Dunlea;John T. Jayne

  • Particulate Emissions from in-use Commercial Aircraft

    Scott C. Herndon;Timothy B. Onasch;Brian P. Frank;Linsey C. Marr

  • Aircraft exhaust sulfur emissions

    R. C. Brown;M. R. Anderson;R. C. Miake-Lye;C. E. Kolb

  • Sampling Artifacts from Conductive Silicone Tubing

    Michael T. Timko;Zhenhong Yu;Jesse Kroll;John T. Jayne

  • Subsonic aircraft: Contrail and cloud effects special study (SUCCESS)

    Owen B. Toon;Richard C. Miake-Lye

  • Alternative Aviation Fuel Experiment (AAFEX)

    B. E. Anderson;A. J. Beyersdorf;C. H. Hudgins;J. V. Plant

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott C. Herndon
Scott C. Herndon Aerodyne Research
Bruce E. Anderson
Bruce E. Anderson Langley Research Center
Robert C. Brown
Robert C. Brown Iowa State University
Timothy B. Onasch
Timothy B. Onasch Boston College
E. L. Winstead
E. L. Winstead Langley Research Center
Andreas J. Beyersdorf
Andreas J. Beyersdorf California State University, San Bernardino
Luke D. Ziemba
Luke D. Ziemba Langley Research Center
Charles E. Kolb
Charles E. Kolb Aerodyne Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Environmental Sciences often involves intersecting fields that enhance your expertise and job prospects. For those interested in Earth’s physical processes, pursuing online geology degrees offers foundational knowledge in geoscience while providing flexibility through digital learning platforms.

Geospatial technology plays a vital role in environmental analysis. Programs featuring best GIS graduate programs equip students to manage and interpret spatial data, essential for resource management, conservation, and urban planning.

Incorporating leadership and policy skills can further impact environmental initiatives. One-year degrees in public administration, such as those highlighted in mpa one year programs, prepare graduates for roles that influence environmental regulation and community engagement.

Additionally, understanding human behavior and social systems is crucial for addressing environmental challenges. Online sociology bachelor programs offer insights into societal dynamics, fostering effective communication and policy development within environmental contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Richard C. Miake-Lye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles