World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
10608
World Ranking
3316
National Ranking
1283

Luke D. Ziemba publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Ziemba sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 236 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Luke D. Ziemba D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Ziemba sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luke D. Ziemba is affiliated with the Langley Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a significant emphasis on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. The body of work encompasses topics such as Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Aeolian processes and effects, and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness, 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • New particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Sizing response of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) and Laser Aerosol Spectrometer (LAS) to changes in submicron aerosol composition and refractive index, 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Atmospheric Research Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean Region and North American East Coast: A Review of Past Work and Challenges Ahead, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Investigation of factors controlling PM2.5 variability across the South Korean Peninsula during KORUS-AQ, 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Luke D. Ziemba include:

  • Ewan Crosbie
  • Michael A. Shook
  • Armin Sorooshian
  • Richard H. Moore
  • Edward L. Winstead

Publications have appeared regularly in prominent venues such as:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Environmental Science Atmospheres

Best Publications

  • The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part II: Evaluation and Case Studies

    V. Buchard;V. Buchard;C. A. Randles;A. M. da Silva;A. Darmenov

  • Microbiome of the upper troposphere: Species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications

    Natasha DeLeon-Rodriguez;Terry L. Lathem;Luis M. Rodriguez-R;James M. Barazesh

  • Evolution of brown carbon in wildfire plumes

    Haviland Forrister;Jiumeng Liu;Jiumeng Liu;Eric Scheuer;Jack Dibb

  • Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions

    Richard H. Moore;Kenneth L. Thornhill;Bernadett Weinzierl;Bernadett Weinzierl;Daniel Sauer;Daniel Sauer

  • Satellite Data of Atmospheric Pollution for U.S. Air Quality Applications: Examples of Applications, Summary of Data End-User Resources, Answers to FAQs, and Common Mistakes to Avoid

    Bryan Neal Duncan;Ana Prados;Ana Prados;Lok N. Lamsal;Lok N. Lamsal;Yang Liu

  • Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness

    Christiane Voigt;Christiane Voigt;Jonas Kleine;Jonas Kleine;Daniel Sauer;Richard H. Moore

  • Substantial Seasonal Contribution of Observed Biogenic Sulfate Particles to Cloud Condensation Nuclei

    Kevin J. Sanchez;Chia Li Chen;Lynn M. Russell;Raghu Betha

  • The North Atlantic Aerosol and Marine Ecosystem Study (NAAMES): Science Motive and Mission Overview

    Michael J. Behrenfeld;Richard H. Moore;Chris A. Hostetler;Jason Graff

  • Brown carbon in the continental troposphere

    Jiumeng Liu;Jiumeng Liu;Eric Scheuer;Jack Dibb;Luke D. Ziemba

  • Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator

    Richard H. Moore;Luke D. Ziemba;Dabrina Dutcher;Andreas J. Beyersdorf

  • Aerosol–Cloud–Meteorology Interaction Airborne Field Investigations: Using Lessons Learned from the U.S. West Coast in the Design of ACTIVATE off the U.S. East Coast

    Armin Sorooshian;Bruce Anderson;Susanne E. Bauer;Rachel A. Braun

  • Airborne measurements of organosulfates over the continental U.S.

    Jin Liao;Jin Liao;Karl D. Froyd;Karl D. Froyd;Daniel M. Murphy;Frank N. Keutsch;Frank N. Keutsch

  • Reductions in aircraft particulate emissions due to the use of Fischer–Tropsch fuels

    A. J. Beyersdorf;M. T. Timko;L. D. Ziemba;D. Bulzan

  • Brown carbon aerosol in the North American continental troposphere: sources, abundance, and radiative forcing

    J. Liu;J. Liu;E. Scheuer;J. Dibb;G. S. Diskin

  • BATAL: The Balloon measurement campaigns of the Asian Tropopause Aerosol Layer

    J.-P. Vernier;T. D. Fairlie;T. Deshler;M. Venkat Ratnam

  • Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol.

    Xiaoxi Liu;Y. Zhang;L. G. Huey;R. J. Yokelson

  • Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth

    Charles A. Brock;Nicholas L. Wagner;Nicholas L. Wagner;Bruce E. Anderson;Alexis R. Attwood;Alexis R. Attwood

  • Cloud condensation nuclei closure during the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation 2004 campaign: Effects of size-resolved composition

    Jeessy Medina;Athanasios Nenes;Rafaella-Eleni P. Sotiropoulou;Laura D. Cottrell

  • New particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer.

    Guangjie Zheng;Yang Wang;Yang Wang;Robert Wood;Michael P. Jensen

  • Influence of Jet Fuel Composition on Aircraft Engine Emissions: A Synthesis of Aerosol Emissions Data from the NASA APEX, AAFEX, and ACCESS Missions

    Richard H. Moore;Michael Shook;Andreas Beyersdorf;Chelsea Corr;Chelsea Corr

  • Nocturnal NO3 radical chemistry in Houston, TX

    Jochen Stutz;Kam Weng Wong;Laura Lawrence;Luke Ziemba

  • A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry

    Karl D. Froyd;Karl D. Froyd;Daniel M. Murphy;Charles A. Brock;Pedro Campuzano-Jost;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce E. Anderson
Bruce E. Anderson Langley Research Center
Andreas J. Beyersdorf
Andreas J. Beyersdorf California State University, San Bernardino
E. L. Winstead
E. L. Winstead Langley Research Center
Armin Wisthaler
Armin Wisthaler University of Oslo
Anne E. Perring
Anne E. Perring Colgate University
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Pedro Campuzano-Jost
Pedro Campuzano-Jost University of Colorado Boulder
Glenn S. Diskin
Glenn S. Diskin Langley Research Center
Jack E. Dibb
Jack E. Dibb University of New Hampshire
Joshua P. Schwarz
Joshua P. Schwarz National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to diverse career paths, often supported by complementary online degrees. For instance, a geographic information systems degree is invaluable for professionals working with spatial data and environmental mapping, enhancing skills in data analysis and resource management.

Many environmental professionals also pursue leadership roles in public policy and administration. Enrolling in one of the best online masters in public administration programs can prepare graduates to influence environmental regulations and manage sustainable projects effectively.

Understanding societal trends and human behavior is another critical aspect of environmental work. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide insights into community impacts and engagement strategies for environmental initiatives.

For those interested in advancing their academic credentials without lengthy commitments, exploring 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offers a fast-track option for leadership and research roles in environmental science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Luke D. Ziemba

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles