World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5252
World Ranking
13045
National Ranking
5253

Victoria Interrante publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victoria Interrante sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Victoria Interrante D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victoria Interrante sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Victoria Interrante is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States, working primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research focuses on areas intersecting Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Cognitive Neuroscience, among others.

Their recent scholarly output includes various papers published primarily in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Notable publications include:

  • The Influence of Avatar Representation on Interpersonal Communication in Virtual Social Environments, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Investigating the Correlation Between Presence and Reaction Time in Mixed Reality, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Embodied Realistic Avatar System with Body Motions and Facial Expressions for Communication in Virtual Reality Applications, 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • Human Factors at Play: Understanding the Impact of Conditioning on Presence and Reaction Time in Mixed Reality, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Peripheral Teleportation: A Rest Frame Design to Mitigate Cybersickness During Virtual Locomotion, 2025, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Their research spans multiple main topics, including:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Victoria Interrante include Yasra Chandio, Fatima M. Anwar, Rachel Masters, Francisco R. Ortega, and Sahar Aseeri.

Their work is featured most often in the following venues:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
  • ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Victoria Interrante has also contributed to book publications through Springer Science+Business Media, including titles such as Advances in Computer Graphics (2021), Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality (2020), and Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality (2021).

The scientist's subfields of study include Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, and Social Psychology.

Victoria Interrante was recognized as an ACM Senior Member in 2007.

Best Publications

  • A novel cubic-order algorithm for approximating principal direction vectors

    Jack Goldfeather;Victoria Interrante

  • Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited

    V. Interrante;B. Ries;L. Anderson

  • Seven League Boots: A New Metaphor for Augmented Locomotion through Moderately Large Scale Immersive Virtual Environments

    V. Interrante;B. Ries;L. Anderson

  • Illustrating surface shape in volume data via principal direction-driven 3D line integral convolution

    Victoria Interrante

  • Strategies for effectively visualizing 3D flow with volume LIC

    Victoria Interrante;Chester Grosch

  • Conveying the 3D shape of smoothly curving transparent surfaces via texture

    V. Interrante;H. Fuchs;S.M. Pizer

  • User Studies: Why, How, and When?

    Robert Kosara;Christopher G. Healey;Victoria Interrante;David H. Laidlaw

  • Enhancing transparent skin surfaces with ridge and valley lines

    Victoria Interrante;Henry Fuchs;Stephen Pizer

  • Method and apparatus for mapping a structure

    H. Toby Markowitz;Sean Campbell-Massa;Phillip Falkner;Ioana Fleming

  • Elucidating factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments

    Victoria Interrante;Brian Ries;Jason Lindquist;Michael Kaeding

  • Line direction matters: an argument for the use of principal directions in 3D line drawings

    Ahna Girshick;Victoria Interrante;Steven Haker;Todd Lemoine

  • Visualizing 3D flow

    V. Interrante;C. Grosch

  • The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments

    Brian Ries;Victoria Interrante;Michael Kaeding;Lee Anderson

  • Weaving Versus Blending: a quantitative assessment of the information carrying capacities of two alternative methods for conveying multivariate data with color.

    H. Hagh-Shenas;Sunghee Kim;V. Interrante;C. Healey

  • The Influence of Avatar Representation on Interpersonal Communication in Virtual Social Environments

    Sahar Aseeri;Victoria Interrante

  • Transitional environments enhance distance perception in immersive virtual reality systems

    Frank Steinicke;Gerd Bruder;Klaus Hinrichs;Markus Lappe

  • Harnessing natural textures for multivariate visualization

    V. Interrante

  • Effectively visualizing multi-valued flow data using color and texture

    T. Urness;V. Interrante;I. Marusic;E. Longmire

  • Redirecting Walking and Driving for Natural Navigation in Immersive Virtual Environments

    G. Bruder;V. Interrante;L. Phillips;F. Steinicke

  • Texture synthesis for 3D shape representation

    G. Gorla;V. Interrante;G. Sapiro

  • Illustrating transparent surfaces with curvature-directed strokes

    Victoria Interrante;Henry Fuchs;Stephen Pizer

  • Virtual and Augmented Reality

    Victoria Interrante;Tobias Hollerer;Anatole Lecuyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Marusic
Ivan Marusic University of Melbourne
Stephen M. Pizer
Stephen M. Pizer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Henry Fuchs
Henry Fuchs University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
David H. Laidlaw
David H. Laidlaw Brown University
J. Edward Swan
J. Edward Swan Mississippi State University
Anatole Lécuyer
Anatole Lécuyer French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Frank Steinicke
Frank Steinicke Universität Hamburg
Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
Bharathram Ganapathisubramani University of Southampton
Tobias Höllerer
Tobias Höllerer University of California, Santa Barbara
Arthur G. Erdman
Arthur G. Erdman University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of opportunities across the technology sector and beyond. Many students are drawn to the flexibility and accessibility of online programs. If you're aiming for flexibility or a fast-track option, consider a computer science accelerated program for a quicker path to graduation.

Computer science skills are highly transferable. For those interested in different but related STEM careers, there are affordable online pathways in fields like engineering and environmental sciences. For example, check out the online degree in mechanical engineering for hands-on problem solving, or explore the cheapest online environmental science degree for a sustainable focus.

Computer science also connects with environmental fields, data analysis, and systems management. To discover what real-world opportunities await across disciplines, explore what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree.

By combining online study options and exploring multidisciplinary pathways, you can find the right degree to match your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Victoria Interrante

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles