World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 16846 15840 8443 7806 315 73811

Caroline A. Macera publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline A. Macera between 1980 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline A. Macera published across 44 years, from 1980 to 2023, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2005. 1 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2005. 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1980 2023

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline A. Macera: publications per year, 1980 to 2023
Year Publications
1980 3
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 3
1991 7
1992 8
1993 10
1994 10
1995 11
1996 12
1997 12
1998 15
1999 11
2000 13
2001 15
2002 5
2003 16
2004 18
2005 23
2006 15
2007 15
2008 12
2009 9
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 10
2014 7
2015 3
2016 6
2017 12
2018 3
2019 1
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 317
Download as CSV

Caroline A. Macera publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline A. Macera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 315 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 315
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Caroline A. Macera D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline A. Macera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Caroline A. Macera is affiliated with San Diego State University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields within health sciences, including Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, as well as Health Professions. This multidisciplinary approach informs much of their recent academic output.

Their work has particularly focused on reproductive and sexual health, addressing topics such as reproductive tract infections, syphilis diagnosis and treatment, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, and related public health concerns. Other notable research interests include physical activity, obesity, diet, and children's physical and motor development, indicating a broad engagement with health outcomes across different populations and stages of life.

Among the recent publications, a notable paper from 2020 titled "Is it time to use nucleic acid amplification tests for identification of persons with sexually transmitted infections? Evidence from seroprevalence and behavioral epidemiology risk surveys in men with chlamydia and gonorrhea" was published in the Pan African Medical Journal. This work contributes to discussions on diagnostic advancements in sexually transmitted infections.

  • Is it time to use nucleic acid amplification tests for identification of persons with sexually transmitted infections? Evidence from seroprevalence and behavioral epidemiology risk surveys in men with chlamydia and gonorrhea (2020, Pan African Medical Journal)

Caroline A. Macera frequently collaborates with a range of researchers, reflecting a collaborative research approach. Some frequent co-authors include:

  • Laura E. Tobin
  • Lydia Guerra
  • Léonce Ahouanvoeke
  • Jose González Carpio
  • D. Irambona

Their publications are commonly found in venues such as the Pan African Medical Journal, indicating a focus on journals addressing global and regional public health challenges.

  • Pan African Medical Journal

Within specific areas of study, the scientist's work includes the subfields of Physiology, Microbiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Developmental and Educational Psychology. This diverse subfield engagement suggests a broad analytical framework applied to their main research topics.

  • Physiology
  • Microbiology
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

The application of their research findings spans both clinical and community health perspectives, largely focused on improving diagnostics, treatment, and preventive strategies for conditions related to sexual and reproductive health and physical well-being.

Best Publications

  • Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association.

    William L Haskell;I-Min Lee;Russell R Pate;Kenneth E Powell

  • Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine

    Russell R. Pate;Michael Pratt;Steven N. Blair;William L. Haskell

  • Physical Activity and Public Health in Older Adults Recommendation From the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association

    Miriam E. Nelson;W. Jack Rejeski;Steven N. Blair;Pamela W. Duncan

  • Changes in Physical Fitness and All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Study of Healthy and Unhealthy Men

    Steven N. Blair;Harold W. Kohl;Carolyn E. Barlow;Ralph S. Paffenbarger

  • Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women

    Steven N. Blair;James B. Kampert;Harold Willis Kohl;Carolyn E. Barlow

  • Television watching, energy intake, and obesity in US children: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

    Carlos J. Crespo;Ellen Smit;Richard P. Troiano;Susan J. Bartlett

  • How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults

    C. Tudor-Locke;L. Burkett;J.P. Reis;B.E. Ainsworth

  • Predicting Lower-Extremity Injuries Among Habitual Runners

    Caroline A. Macera;Russell R. Pate;Kenneth E. Powell;Kirby L. Jackson

  • Higher direct medical costs associated with physical inactivity.

    Michael Pratt;Caroline A. Macera;Guijing Wang

  • Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes.

    Simon J. Marshall;Susan S. Levy;Catrine E. Tudor-Locke;Fred W. Kolkhorst

  • Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity

    Barbara Ainsworth;David R. Bassett;Scott Strath;Ann Swartz

  • Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults - United States, 2000-2001.

    C. A. Macera;D. A. Jones;M. M. Yore;S. A. Ham

  • A MAIL SURVEY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY HABITS AS RELATED TO MEASURED PHYSICAL FITNESS

    Harold Willis Kohl;Steven N. Blair;Ralph S. Paffenbarger;Caroline A. Macera

  • Muscular strength and physical function.

    Patricia A. Brill;Caroline A. Macera;Dorothy R. Davis;Steven N. Blair

  • Moderate leisure-time physical activity: who is meeting the public health recommendations? A national cross-sectional study.

    Deborah Arriaza Jones;Barbara E. Ainsworth;Janet B. Croft;Caroline A. Macera

  • Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries among Sedentary and Physically Active Adults.

    Jennifer M. Hootman;Caroline A. Macera;Barbara E. Ainsworth;Cheryl L. Addy

  • Race/ethnicity, social class, and leisure-time physical inactivity.

    Simon J Marshall;Deborah A Jones;Barbara E Ainsworth;Jared P Reis

  • Best practices for physical activity programs and behavior counseling in older adult populations.

    M. Elaine Cress;David M. Buchner;Thomas Prohaska;James Rimmer

  • Total Cholesterol and High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol as Important Predictors of Erectile Dysfunction

    Ming Wei;Caroline A. Macera;Dorothy R. Davis;Carlton A. Hornung

  • PEER REVIEWED: Prevalence of Physical Activity in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001

    Caroline A Macera;Sandra A Ham;Michelle M Yore;Deborah A Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara E. Ainsworth
Barbara E. Ainsworth Arizona State University
Steven N. Blair
Steven N. Blair University of South Carolina
Harold W. Kohl
Harold W. Kohl The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Russell R. Pate
Russell R. Pate University of South Carolina
Deborah L. Wingard
Deborah L. Wingard University of California, San Diego
Janet B. Croft
Janet B. Croft Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Michael Pratt
Michael Pratt University of California, San Diego
Kirby L. Jackson
Kirby L. Jackson University of South Carolina
David M. Buchner
David M. Buchner University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
William K. Scott
William K. Scott University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or a related field in the USA doesn’t always follow a traditional path. Many students and professionals choose flexible options such as online degrees or certifications. These pathways allow for continued education while managing work or personal commitments.

If you’re interested in advanced nursing, exploring the cheapest online dnp programs can significantly reduce your financial burden. Pharmacists seeking to advance their education from anywhere may benefit from online pharm d programs, which offer flexibility and accessibility.

For those looking to enter the growing field of healthcare administration, a health information management degree online can provide valuable skills for managing patient data, compliance, and information systems. Meanwhile, students seeking a quick entry point into healthcare may consider medical billing and coding online courses cost to compare affordable programs in this high-demand field.

These online programs offer diverse routes into the medical sector, supporting both newcomers and professionals looking to advance their careers in medicine and allied health.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline A. Macera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles