World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6155 5789 3288 3050 483 51769

Catrine Tudor-Locke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catrine Tudor-Locke between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catrine Tudor-Locke published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 18.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2015. 13 of the 496 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2015. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 46 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

496 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catrine Tudor-Locke: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 3
2001 11
2002 13
2003 15
2004 15
2005 14
2006 24
2007 14
2008 19
2009 26
2010 19
2011 35
2012 28
2013 23
2014 18
2015 46
2016 32
2017 27
2018 35
2019 28
2020 12
2021 11
2022 9
2023 3
2024 5
2025 8
Total 496
Download as CSV

Catrine Tudor-Locke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catrine Tudor-Locke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 483 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 483
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Catrine Tudor-Locke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catrine Tudor-Locke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Catrine Tudor-Locke is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of physical activity and health, with extensive contributions within medicine and several related subfields.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, Tudor-Locke's prominent subfields of research cover:

  • Physiology
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

The core research topics frequently addressed in their work include:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Tudor-Locke has contributed to multiple publication venues, with repeat appearances in the following journals:

  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Journal of Sport and Health Science
  • UNC Libraries
  • Sports Medicine

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Tudor-Locke include:

  • "2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activities," 2024, Journal of Sport and Health Science
  • "Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," 2020, Sports Medicine
  • "Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 41 to 60-year-old adults: the CADENCE-adults study," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Breastfeeding and childhood obesity: A 12-country study," 2020, Maternal and Child Nutrition
  • "Untapping the Health Enhancing Potential of Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity (VILPA): Rationale, Scoping Review, and a 4-Pillar Research Framework," 2020, Sports Medicine

Frequent collaborators in Tudor-Locke's research include:

  • Elroy J. Aguiar
  • Christopher C. Moore
  • Scott W. Ducharme
  • John M. Schuna
  • Tiago V. Barreira

Best Publications

  • 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

    Barbara E. Ainsworth;William L. Haskell;Stephen D. Herrmann;Nathanael Meckes

  • How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;David R. Bassett

  • Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity.

    Timothy S. Church;Diana M. Thomas;Catrine Tudor-Locke;Peter T. Katzmarzyk

  • How many steps/day are enough? for adults

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Wendy J Brown;Stacy A Clemes

  • How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Yukitoshi Aoyagi;Rhonda C Bell

  • Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Joel E. Williams;Jared P. Reis;Delores Pluto

  • Methodological Considerations for Researchers and Practitioners Using Pedometers to Measure Physical (Ambulatory) Activity

    Catrine E. Tudor-Locke;Anita M. Myers

  • Revisiting "how many steps are enough?".

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Yoshiro Hatano;Robert P. Pangrazi;Minsoo Kang

  • How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Michael W Beets;Sarahjane Belton

  • Challenges and Opportunities for Measuring Physical Activity in Sedentary Adults

    Catrine E. Tudor-Locke;Catrine E. Tudor-Locke;Anita M. Myers;Anita M. Myers

  • How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults

    C. Tudor-Locke;L. Burkett;J.P. Reis;B.E. Ainsworth

  • BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children.

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Robert P Pangrazi;Charles B Corbin;William J Rutherford

  • Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes.

    Simon J. Marshall;Susan S. Levy;Catrine E. Tudor-Locke;Fred W. Kolkhorst

  • Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Barbara E Ainsworth;Raymond W Thompson;Raymond W Thompson;Charles E Matthews;Charles E Matthews

  • Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers.

    Catherine B. Chan;Daniel A.J. Ryan;Catrine Tudor-Locke;Catrine Tudor-Locke

  • Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.

    Guy C. Le Masurier;Catrine Tudor-Locke

  • Active commuting to school: an overlooked source of childrens' physical activity?

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Barbara E. Ainsworth;Barry M. Popkin

  • A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index: <5000 steps/day

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;John P Thyfault;John C Spence

  • Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Meghan M Brashear;William D Johnson;Peter T Katzmarzyk

  • Controlled outcome evaluation of the First Step Program: a daily physical activity intervention for individuals with type II diabetes

    C Tudor-Locke;R C Bell;A M Myers;A M Myers;S B Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Peter T. Katzmarzyk Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Tim Olds
Tim Olds University of South Australia
Mark S. Tremblay
Mark S. Tremblay Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Carol Maher
Carol Maher University of South Australia
Gang Hu
Gang Hu Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Jean-Philippe Chaput
Jean-Philippe Chaput University of Ottawa
Timothy S. Church
Timothy S. Church Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Barbara E. Ainsworth
Barbara E. Ainsworth Arizona State University
Estelle V. Lambert
Estelle V. Lambert University of Cape Town

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of healthcare education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with flexible online options making it easier than ever to advance your career. Many students are choosing online programs that fit their busy schedules and personal commitments.

For registered nurses aiming to further their education with minimal disruption, there are online rn to bsn no clinicals pathways that allow you to earn your degree without the need for additional hands-on clinical hours. If you’re looking to reach the highest levels in nursing, several dnp programs online offer flexibility in coursework and faster completion times.

Some students prefer accelerated routes, such as the fast lpn program, which provides a quick entry point into nursing. For those who already hold a master’s in nursing, exploring the shortest post master's dnp program can help you achieve your doctorate efficiently.

These online options expand possibilities for students at every stage—making it easier to find a career pathway that matches your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Catrine Tudor-Locke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles