World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7811 7286 4197 3814 108 8531

Paul W. Eastwick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul W. Eastwick between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul W. Eastwick published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2016. 20 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2016. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 8 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
2006 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul W. Eastwick: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 8
2010 2
2011 5
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 10
2016 13
2017 8
2018 10
2019 9
2020 7
2021 1
2022 8
2023 3
2024 10
2025 10
Total 134
Download as CSV

Paul W. Eastwick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Eastwick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul W. Eastwick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Eastwick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul W. Eastwick is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States and specializes primarily in psychology and social sciences. Their research spans across several subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their scholarly output encompasses a range of topics, focusing notably on attachment and relationship dynamics, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, behavioral health and interventions, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, and family dynamics and relationships.

Eastwick's recent publications include the following:

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies (2020) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations (2021) in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Solutions to the problems of incremental validity testing in relationship science (2020) in Personal Relationships
  • Implicit Bias ≠ Bias on Implicit Measures (2022) in Psychological Inquiry
  • Personality and Social Relationships: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go (2023) in Personality Science

The venues where Eastwick most frequently publishes include:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Psychological Inquiry
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Frequent collaborators in Eastwick's work consist of:

  • Eli J. Finkel
  • Samantha Joel
  • Alison Ledgerwood
  • Bertram Gawronski
  • Serena Chen

Best Publications

  • Online Dating A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science

    Eli J. Finkel;Paul W. Eastwick;Benjamin R. Karney;Harry T. Reis

  • Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

    Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel

  • Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability

    Molly E. Ireland;Richard B. Slatcher;Paul W. Eastwick;Lauren E. Scissors

  • The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences: A Review and Meta-Analysis

    Paul W. Eastwick;Laura B. Luchies;Eli J. Finkel;Lucy L. Hunt

  • Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction.

    Harry T. Reis;Michael R. Maniaci;Peter A. Caprariello;Paul W. Eastwick

  • The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles.

    Eli J. Finkel;Jeffry A. Simpson;Paul W. Eastwick

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Colleen J. Allison;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm

    Natasha D. Tidwell;Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel

  • Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer.

    Eli J. Finkel;a Paul W. Eastwick;a Jacob Matthews

  • Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.

    Eli J. Finkel;Paul W. Eastwick;Harry T. Reis

  • The attachment system in fledgling relationships: an activating role for attachment anxiety.

    Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel

  • Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world

    Paul W. Eastwick;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Selective Versus Unselective Romantic Desire: Not All Reciprocity Is Created Equal

    Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel;Daniel Mochon;Dan Ariely

  • Is Traditional Gender Ideology Associated with Sex-Typed Mate Preferences? A Test in Nine Nations

    Paul W. Eastwick;Alice H Eagly;Peter Glick;Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt

  • Mispredicting distress following romantic breakup: Revealing the time course of the affective forecasting error

    Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel;Tamar Krishnamurti;George Loewenstein

  • Beyond the pleistocene: using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating.

    Paul W. Eastwick

  • Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity.

    Paul W. Eastwick;Alice H. Eagly;Eli J. Finkel;Sarah E. Johnson

  • "Going out" of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship.

    Jackson G. Lu;Andrew C. Hafenbrack;Paul W. Eastwick;Dan J. Wang

  • Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel

  • When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships

    Paul W. Eastwick;Eli J. Finkel;Alice H. Eagly

Frequent Co-Authors

Eli J. Finkel
Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University
Harry T. Reis
Harry T. Reis University of Rochester
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Susan Sprecher
Susan Sprecher Illinois State University
Malte Friese
Malte Friese Saarland University
William B. Swann
William B. Swann The University of Texas at Austin
Michał Bilewicz
Michał Bilewicz University of Warsaw
Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of meaningful careers. Many students interested in psychology consider online programs for greater flexibility and accessibility. Among the most rewarding fields is behavior analysis, which is in high demand across the country.

To become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), specific education and certification steps are required. Requirements may vary by location. For example, those interested in becoming a bcba in Kansas City or becoming a bcba in Laredo should review local guidelines and state-specific regulations.

Pursuing this pathway can involve understanding the Las Vegas bcba education requirements or researching the Lexington bcba education requirements. These outlines provide insights into required degrees, supervised experience, and certification exams.

Whether aiming for clinical roles, educational settings, or research, online psychology degrees can be a launch pad toward specialized careers like BCBA. Explore your local requirements and consider accredited online programs to begin your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Eastwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles