World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
53769
World Ranking
18227
National Ranking
9090

Nathaniel Reichek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel Reichek sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 401 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nathaniel Reichek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel Reichek sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathaniel Reichek was affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research focus was primarily in the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other subfields they contributed to included Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Oncology, and Nephrology.

Their work covered a range of topics, notably:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

They published in various venues, with repeated contributions to the following journals:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Kidney Medicine
  • American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice

Frequent coauthors included:

  • Galen Cook-Wiens
  • Eileen Handberg
  • Janet Wei
  • Vera Bittner
  • Steven E. Reís

Notable recent papers by Nathaniel Reichek comprised:

  • "Predicted Versus Observed Major Adverse Cardiac Event Risk in Women With Evidence of Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Report From WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation)", 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • "Cardiac Imaging in Dialysis Patients", 2020, Kidney Medicine
  • "Risk factors for heart failure in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease", 2021, American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice
  • "Long-Term Adverse Outcomes in Black Women With Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Study of the WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) Cohort", 2023, Circulation
  • "ABSOLUTE CUMULATIVE DOSE NOT CUMULATIVE DOSE INDEXED BY BSA PREDICTS DOXORUBICIN-INDUCED SUBCLINICAL CARDIOTOXICITY", 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

    N. B. Schiller;P. M. Shah;M. Crawford;A. DeMaria

  • Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings

    Richard B. Devereux;Richard B. Devereux;Daniel R. Alonso;Daniel R. Alonso;Elizabeth M. Lutas;Elizabeth M. Lutas;Geoffrey J. Gottlieb;Geoffrey J. Gottlieb

  • Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method.

    R B Devereux;N Reichek

  • Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the 4E-left ventricular hypertrophy study.

    Bertram Pitt;Nathaniel Reichek;Roland Willenbrock;Faiez Zannad

  • Noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic stress: validation of the method and initial application.

    N Reichek;J Wilson;M St John Sutton;T A Plappert

  • Contribution of skeletal muscle atrophy to exercise intolerance and altered muscle metabolism in heart failure.

    Donna M. Mancini;Glenn Walter;Nathaniel Reichek;Robert Lenkinski

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction is highly prevalent in women with chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease: Results from the NHLBI WISE study

    Steven E. Reis;Richard Holubkov;A.J.Conrad Smith;Sheryl F. Kelsey

  • Mitral valve prolapse.

    R B Devereux;J K Perloff;N Reichek;M E Josephson

  • Prognosis in severe heart failure: Relation to hemodynamic measurements and ventricular ectopic activity

    John R. Wilson;J. Sanford Schwartz;Martin St. John Sutton;Nancy Ferraro

  • Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms.

    Buchthal Sd;den Hollander Ja;Merz Cn;Rogers Wj

  • Three-dimensional left ventricular deformation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Alistair A. Young;Christopher M. Kramer;Victor A. Ferrari;Leon Axel

  • The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: protocol design, methodology and feasibility report

    C.Noel Bairey Merz;C.Noel Bairey Merz;Sheryl F Kelsey;Carl J Pepine;Nathaniel Reichek

  • Experimental congestive heart failure produced by rapid ventricular pacing in the dog: cardiac effects.

    J. R. Wilson;P. Douglas;W. F. Hickey;V. Lanoce

  • Anatomic validation of left ventricular mass estimates from clinical two-dimensional echocardiography: initial results.

    N. Reichek;J. Helak;T. Plappert;M. S. Sutton

  • Left ventricular shape, afterload and survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Pamela S. Douglas;Robert Morrow;Alfred Ioli;Nathaniel Reichek

  • Hypoestrogenemia of hypothalamic origin and coronary artery disease in premenopausal women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study

    C Noel Bairey Merz;B.Delia Johnson;Barry L Sharaf;Vera Bittner

  • Detailed angiographic analysis of women with suspected ischemic chest pain (pilot phase data from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE] study angiographic core laboratory)

    Barry L Sharaf;Carl J Pepine;Richard A Kerensky;Steven E Reis

  • Cardiac fatigue after prolonged exercise.

    P. S. Douglas;M. L. O'toole;W. D. B. Hiller;K. Hackney

  • Two-dimensional and Doppler-echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization correlates of survival in primary pulmonary hypertension.

    S B Eysmann;H I Palevsky;N Reichek;K Hackney

  • Early Contrast-Enhanced MRI Predicts Late Functional Recovery After Reperfused Myocardial Infarction

    Walter J. Rogers;Christopher M. Kramer;Gennady Geskin;Yong-Lin Hu

Frequent Co-Authors

Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Yi Wang
Yi Wang Cornell University
Leon Axel
Leon Axel New York University
Carl J. Pepine
Carl J. Pepine University of Florida
Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
William J. Rogers
William J. Rogers University of Alabama at Birmingham
C. Noel Bairey Merz
C. Noel Bairey Merz Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
George Sopko
George Sopko National Institutes of Health
Sheryl F. Kelsey
Sheryl F. Kelsey University of Pittsburgh
Richard Holubkov
Richard Holubkov University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring options beyond a traditional medical degree in the USA, there are many online programs worth considering. The healthcare field offers a range of accessible pathways for gaining vital skills, advancing your career, or transitioning into nursing and related professions.

Nursing is in high demand, and online degrees provide flexibility for working adults. For those aiming to become nurse practitioners, there are affordable online fnp programs that allow you to train at a lower cost while maintaining your current schedule. Similarly, if you’re seeking basic registered nursing credentials, several cheap online nursing programs help you get started in the profession.

Professionals with existing RN certification can further their education through the cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs, which open doors to wider job opportunities and higher pay. For those interested in leadership, teaching, or research, pursuing an online nursing doctorate can be a game-changer.

These online pathways offer affordable, flexible options for building a successful healthcare career while balancing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Nathaniel Reichek

Recently Published Articles