World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
35035
World Ranking
12995
National Ranking
6644

Raymond Y. Kwong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Y. Kwong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 501 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Raymond Y. Kwong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Y. Kwong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond Y. Kwong is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with specific attention to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, along with related subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, molecular biology, and nephrology.

The scientist's main research topics encompass cardiac imaging and diagnostics, advanced MRI techniques and applications, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, viral infections and immunology research, amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment, and coronary interventions and diagnostics.

Frequent collaborators include Michael Jerosch-Herold, Bobak Heydari, Panagiotis Antiochos, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, and Victor A. Ferrari.

Raymond Y. Kwong has published extensively in venues that include:

  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal

Recent notable papers authored by or involving Kwong are listed below:

  • Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Common Genetic Variants and Modifiable Risk Factors Underpin Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Susceptibility and Expressivity, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women, 2020, Circulation
  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging, 2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

    Stephan D. Fihn;Julius M. Gardin;Jonathan Abrams;Kathleen Berra

  • Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.

    David J. Maron;Judith S. Hochman;Harmony R. Reynolds;Sripal Bangalore

  • Impact of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Detected by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Event-Free Survival in Patients Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Anna K. Chan;Kenneth A. Brown;Carmen W. Chan

  • ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging

    Robert C. Hendel;Daniel S. Berman;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

    Stephan D. Fihn;Julius M. Gardin;Jonathan Abrams;Kathleen Berra

  • Characterization of the Peri-Infarct Zone by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Powerful Predictor of Post–Myocardial Infarction Mortality

    Andrew T. Yan;Adolphe J. Shayne;Kenneth A. Brown;Sandeep N. Gupta

  • Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop

    Glenn I. Fishman;Sumeet S. Chugh;John P. Dimarco;Christine M. Albert

  • Myocardial Fibrosis as an Early Manifestation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Carolyn Y. Ho;Begoña López;Otavio R. Coelho-Filho;Neal K. Lakdawala

  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging

    Sharmila Dorbala;Yukio Ando;Sabahat Bokhari;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Enhances Prognostic Assessments of Patients With Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis

    Ron Blankstein;Michael Osborne;Masanao Naya;Alfonso Waller

  • Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study

    Matthew P. Schenker;Sharmila Dorbala;Eric Cho Tek Hong;Frank J. Rybicki

  • Detecting Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Adam E. Schussheim;Suresh Rekhraj;Anthony H. Aletras

  • Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Characterized by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Diabetic Patients Without Clinical Evidence of Myocardial Infarction

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Hamid Sattar;Henry Wu;Gabriel Vorobiof

  • Percutaneous Mitral Annuloplasty for Functional Mitral Regurgitation Results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study

    Joachim Schofer;Tomasz Siminiak;Michael Haude;Jean P. Herrman

  • Visceral adiposity and the risk of metabolic syndrome across body mass index: the MESA Study.

    Ravi V. Shah;Venkatesh L. Murthy;Siddique A. Abbasi;Ron Blankstein

  • Single unit analysis of the human ventral thalamic nuclear group: correlation of thalamic "tremor cells" with the 3-6 Hz component of parkinsonian tremor

    FA Lenz;RR Tasker;HC Kwan;S Schnider

  • Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization in Risk Stratifying Patients With Suspected Myocarditis

    Christoph Gräni;Christian Eichhorn;Loïc Bière;Venkatesh L. Murthy

  • 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary

    Stephan D. Fihn;Julius M. Gardin;Jonathan Abrams;Kathleen Berra

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Rodney H. Falk

  • Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

    Andrew E. Arai;Raymond Y. Kwong

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Jerosch-Herold
Michael Jerosch-Herold Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ron Blankstein
Ron Blankstein Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Sharmila Dorbala
Sharmila Dorbala Brigham and Women's Hospital
William G. Stevenson
William G. Stevenson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Christopher M. Kramer
Christopher M. Kramer University of Virginia Health System
Rodney H. Falk
Rodney H. Falk Brigham and Women's Hospital
Andrew E. Arai
Andrew E. Arai National Institutes of Health
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in alternative routes into the healthcare sector or expanding their qualifications, online degrees offer flexibility and accessibility. Many professionals are choosing specialized advanced programs, such as phd in nursing online programs, to enhance their expertise and career opportunities in research or academia without sacrificing their current obligations.

Affordability is a significant concern for many prospective students. Comparing the average cost of rn to bsn programs helps identify budget-friendly options that allow registered nurses to advance their credentials efficiently.

Non-nurses looking for a rapid entry into the profession often explore the cheapest direct entry msn programs, which provide a straightforward path to a master’s degree for those with a bachelor’s degree in another field. Additionally, many are drawn to convenient direct entry nursing programs that fast-track students into the healthcare workforce.

Exploring these online degrees and pathways can help you match your career goals with the right educational opportunities, budget considerations, and work-life balance.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond Y. Kwong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles