World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
33930
World Ranking
10831
National Ranking
5575

Rodney H. Falk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rodney H. Falk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rodney H. Falk is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in related subfields including Molecular Biology, Nephrology, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Genetics.

The central focus of their scientific work involves topics such as Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes, Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research, Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies, Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis, Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes, and areas concerning Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema.

Their recent papers include:

  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging (2021), Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Cardiac Scintigraphy With Technetium-99m-Labeled Bone-Seeking Tracers for Suspected Amyloidosis (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Phase 3 Multicenter Study of Revusiran in Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin-Mediated (hATTR) Amyloidosis with Cardiomyopathy (ENDEAVOUR) (2020), Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
  • Longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of survival and response to therapy in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (2021), European Heart Journal
  • Absolute Quantitation of Cardiac 99mTc-Pyrophosphate Using Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride-Based SPECT/CT (2020), Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include Sharmila Dorbala, Sarah Cuddy, Frederick L. Ruberg, Olivier Clerc, and Marie Foley Kijewski.

Their work has been published extensively in the following venues:

  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal

Best Publications

  • Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): A consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis

    Morie A. Gertz;Ray Comenzo;Rodney H. Falk;Jean Paul Fermand

  • Nonbiopsy Diagnosis of Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

    Julian D. Gillmore;Mathew S. Maurer;Rodney H. Falk;Giampaolo Merlini

  • The Systemic Amyloidoses

    Rodney H. Falk;Raymond L. Comenzo;Martha Skinner

  • Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Randomised Clinical Trial

    J. L. Blackshear;V. S. Baker;F. Rubino;R. Safford

  • Diagnosis and Management of the Cardiac Amyloidoses

    Rodney H. Falk

  • High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: An 8-Year Study

    Martha Skinner;Vaishali Sanchorawala;David C Seldin;Laura M Dember

  • The clinical features of immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis with heart involvement.

    S W Dubrey;K Cha;J Anderson;B Chamarthi

  • Consensus recommendations for the management of chronic heart failure: Introduction

    Milton Packer;Jay N. Cohn;William T. Abraham;Wilson S. Colucci

  • ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI Expert Consensus Recommendations for Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2—Evidence Base and Standardized Methods of Imaging

    Sharmila Dorbala;Yukio Ando;Sabahat Bokhari;Angela Dispenzieri

  • Longitudinal Myocardial Function Assessed by Tissue Velocity, Strain, and Strain Rate Tissue Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With AL (Primary) Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Jun Koyama;Patricia A. Ray-Sequin;Rodney H. Falk

  • AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review of Diagnosis and Therapy.

    Rodney H. Falk;Kevin M. Alexander;Ronglih Liao;Sharmila Dorbala

  • The Warfarin/Aspirin Study in Heart failure (WASH): a randomized trial comparing antithrombotic strategies for patients with heart failure.

    J.G.F Cleland;I Findlay;S Jafri;G Sutton

  • Treatment of 100 patients with primary amyloidosis: A randomized trial of melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine versus colchicine only

    Martha Skinner;Jennifer J. Anderson;Robert Simms;Rodney Falk

  • Senile Systemic Amyloidosis Presenting With Heart Failure A Comparison With Light Chain-Associated Amyloidosis

    Belinda Ng;Lawreen H. Connors;Ravin Davidoff;Martha Skinner

  • Digoxin for Converting Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial

    Rodney H. Falk;Anne A. Knowlton;Sheilah A. Bernard;Norman E. Gotlieb

  • Consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in systemic light-chain amyloidosis

    R. L. Comenzo;D. Reece;G. Palladini;D. Seldin

  • Dose-intensive melphalan with blood stem-cell support for the treatment of AL (amyloid light-chain) amyloidosis : Survival and responses in 25 patients

    Raymond L. Comenzo;Evan Vosburgh;Rodney H. Falk;Vaishali Sanchorawala

  • Amyloidogenic light chains induce cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction and apoptosis via a non-canonical p38α MAPK pathway

    Jianru Shi;Jian Guan;Bingbing Jiang;Daniel A. Brenner

  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

    Raymond Y. Kwong;Rodney H. Falk

  • Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from th 10th International Symposium on Amyloid an Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18-22 April 2004

    IT Istituto Superiore di Sanit;Grateau G;Solomon A;Sezer O

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha Skinner
Martha Skinner Boston University
Sharmila Dorbala
Sharmila Dorbala Brigham and Women's Hospital
David C. Seldin
David C. Seldin Boston University
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Mathew S. Maurer
Mathew S. Maurer Columbia University
Giampaolo Merlini
Giampaolo Merlini University of Pavia
Alan S. Cohen
Alan S. Cohen Boston University
Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Claudio Rapezzi
Claudio Rapezzi University of Ferrara
Raymond Y. Kwong
Raymond Y. Kwong Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare beyond medicine? There are numerous online degree pathways available for those interested in administration or nursing. One crucial factor to consider is accreditation. If you’re aiming for leadership roles, exploring which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? can ensure you choose a quality program that aligns with industry standards.

For registered nurses looking to advance, flexible options now exist. Some of the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer working nurses a chance to upgrade credentials without needing to complete additional hands-on training, making education more accessible.

Those pursuing advanced practice will find there are options designed to fast-track your education. If time is a concern, check out the shortest dnp programs online or seek out programs considered the dnp programs online to fit your needs.

Each career pathway covers different skills and specializations. Carefully review program requirements, especially for online formats, to find the best fit for your goals in the US healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Rodney H. Falk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles