World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Luc Mortelmans

Luc Mortelmans

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
28985
World Ranking
13602
National Ranking
167

Luc Mortelmans publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Mortelmans sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 543 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Luc Mortelmans D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Mortelmans sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luc Mortelmans is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their academic profile reflects involvement in scientific research, although specific details about research areas, publications, or collaborations are not available from the provided data.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues listed for Luc Mortelmans, indicating a limited publicly available record of scholarly outputs linked to the profile at this time.

The absence of information on main fields of study, subfields of study, and main topics suggests that detailed subject matter expertise or thematic focus cannot be established based on the current data.

No book publications or awards have been documented for Luc Mortelmans, which means there is no recorded recognition or contributions to academic book publishing under this profile.

Best Publications

  • Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circulation in humans.

    Abderrahim Nemmar;Peter Hoet;B Vanquickenborne;D Dinsdale

  • Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Stefan Janssens;Christophe Dubois;Jan Bogaert;Koen Theunissen

  • Utility of Positron Emission Tomography for the Staging of Patients With Potentially Operable Esophageal Carcinoma

    P Flamen;A Lerut;E Van Cutsem;W De Wever

  • Repetitive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a prospective study of 35 patients.

    Daniel Engelbert Blockmans;Liesbet de Ceuninck;Steven Vanderschueren;Daniel Knockaert

  • 18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec).

    S. Stroobants;J. Goeminne;M. Seegers;S. Dimitrijevic

  • Deficiency or inhibition of oxygen sensor Phd1 induces hypoxia tolerance by reprogramming basal metabolism

    Julián Aragonés;Martin Schneider;Martin Schneider;Martin Schneider;Katie Van Geyte;Katie Van Geyte;Peter Fraisl;Peter Fraisl

  • Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases

    Johan F. Vansteenkiste;Sigrid G. Stroobants;Patrick J. Dupont;Paul R. De Leyn

  • Lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancer with FDG-PET scan: a prospective study on 690 lymph node stations from 68 patients.

    J F Vansteenkiste;S G Stroobants;P R De Leyn;P J Dupont

  • Intravenous cyclosporine versus intravenous corticosteroids as single therapy for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis.

    G D'Haens;L Lemmens;Karel Geboes;L Vandeputte

  • Early restaging positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

    K. Spaepen;S. Stroobants;P. Dupont;P. Vandenberghe

  • Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18f]FDG) after first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma : Is [18F]FDG-PET a valid alternative to conventional diagnostic methods?

    Karoline Spaepen;Sigrid Stroobants;Patrick Dupont;Steven Van Steenweghen

  • Positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: evidence for inflammation of the aortic arch

    Daniel Engelbert Blockmans;S Stroobants;Alex Maes;Luc Mortelmans

  • Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer

    P. Flamen;E. Van Cutsem;A. Lerut;J.-P. Cambier

  • Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms

    J. Nuyts;P. Dupont;S. Stroobants;R. Benninck

  • Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study

    John Nuyts;Bruno De Man;Patrick Dupont;Michel Defrise

  • [18F]MK-9470, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for in vivo human PET brain imaging of the cannabinoid-1 receptor

    H. Donald Burns;Koen Van Laere;Sandra Sanabria-Bohórquez;Terence G. Hamill

  • Histological alterations in chronically hypoperfused myocardium. Correlation with PET findings.

    A. Maes;W. Flameng;J. Nuyts;M. Borgers

  • Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.

    Toni Lerut;Patrick Flamen;Nadine Ectors;Erik Van Cutsem

  • Comparative analysis of adeno-associated viral vector serotypes 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 in mouse brain.

    Jean-Marc Taymans;Luk H Vandenberghe;Chris Van Den Haute;Irina Thiry

  • Clinical Value of [18F]fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin

    Daniel Engelbert Blockmans;Daniel Knockaert;Alex Maes;J De Caestecker

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix M. Mottaghy
Felix M. Mottaghy RWTH Aachen University
Zeger Debyser
Zeger Debyser KU Leuven
Guy A. Orban
Guy A. Orban University of Parma
Jan Bogaert
Jan Bogaert KU Leuven
Paul Suetens
Paul Suetens KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online degree options and dynamic career pathways. Many students begin their medical journey with nursing, taking advantage of accredited and affordable nursing degree programs that can be completed online. For entry-level roles, you might consider the cheapest online nursing programs, which provide a solid foundation in healthcare and prepare you for licensure as a registered nurse (RN).

For current RNs seeking to advance their careers, affordable bridge options such as the cheap rn to bsn programs enable you to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing entirely online, often at a lower cost than traditional on-campus programs.

Those aiming for advanced practice roles can explore the cheapest np school online. Nurse Practitioner (NP) programs equip you with specialized skills for leadership and clinical expertise.

If you are looking for doctoral-level studies, the cheapest dnp programs offer pathways to careers in research, teaching, or executive healthcare leadership. Affordable online degrees make these options accessible and can shape your long-term career prospects in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Luc Mortelmans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles