World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
33547
World Ranking
2014
National Ranking
1172

Gordon Pennycook publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon Pennycook sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Gordon Pennycook D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon Pennycook sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon Pennycook is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has a significant presence in the field of social sciences, with a focus on misinformation, social media, and psychology. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including sociology, political science, communication, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and statistical and nonlinear physics.

The researcher's main topics of work include misinformation and its impacts, social media and politics, the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, media influence and health, social and intergroup psychology, and opinion dynamics and social influence.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Pennycook are:

  • David G. Rand
  • Hause Lin
  • Ziv Epstein
  • Adam J. Berinsky
  • Antonio A. Arechar

Pennycook has published extensively in various academic venues. Among the most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • PNAS Nexus
  • Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Judgment and Decision Making

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention, 2020, Psychological Science
  • The Psychology of Fake News, 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online, 2021, Nature
  • The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings, 2020, Management Science

In addition to journal articles, Pennycook has contributed to book publications. Notably, they authored The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation in 2021, published by the Swiss School of Archaeology in Greece.

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • The science of fake news

    David M. J. Lazer;Matthew A. Baum;Yochai Benkler;Adam J. Berinsky

  • Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.

    Gordon Pennycook;Jonathon McPhetres;Jonathon McPhetres;Yunhao Zhang;Jackson G. Lu

  • Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.

    Gordon Pennycook;David G. Rand

  • Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.

    Gordon Pennycook;Tyrone D. Cannon;David G. Rand

  • The Psychology of Fake News

    Gordon Pennycook;David G. Rand

  • Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.

    Gordon Pennycook;Ziv Epstein;Mohsen Mosleh;Mohsen Mosleh;Antonio A. Arechar

  • Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality

    Gordon Pennycook;David G. Rand

  • Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.

    Gordon Pennycook;David G. Rand

  • Intuition, reason, and metacognition

    Valerie A. Thompson;Jamie A. Prowse Turner;Gordon Pennycook

  • The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings

    Gordon Pennycook;Adam Bear;Evan T. Collins;David Gertler Rand

  • On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Nathaniel Barr;Derek J. Koehler

  • Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Paul Seli;Derek J. Koehler

  • Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.

    Bence Bago;David G. Rand;Gordon Pennycook

  • What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.

    Gordon Pennycook;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Derek J. Koehler

  • Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news

    Cameron Martel;Gordon Pennycook;David Gertler Rand

  • Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking

    Gordon Pennycook;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Derek J. Koehler

  • Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking

    Michael V. Bronstein;Gordon Pennycook;Adam Bear;David G. Rand

  • The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking

    Valerie A. Thompson;Jamie A. Prowse Turner;Gordon Pennycook;Linden J. Ball

  • Going against the herd: psychological and cultural factors underlying the 'vaccination confidence gap'

    Matthew Browne;Patricia Thomson;Matthew Justus Rockloff;Gordon Pennycook

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University
Jonathan A. Fugelsang
Jonathan A. Fugelsang University of Waterloo
Derek J. Koehler
Derek J. Koehler University of Waterloo
Valerie A. Thompson
Valerie A. Thompson University of Saskatchewan
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Paul Seli
Paul Seli Duke University
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Linda J. Skitka
Linda J. Skitka University of Illinois at Chicago
Robb Willer
Robb Willer Stanford University
Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are diverse online degree programs and career opportunities to consider. Online psychology degrees can provide flexibility for working professionals or students balancing other commitments. Whether you plan to become a mental health counselor, therapist, or researcher, it’s important to understand the education and certification requirements in your desired location.

For example, each state and even city may have unique steps for entering the counseling profession. Learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Philadelphia or see the specific Phoenix mental health counselor certification requirements. Those aiming to practice in Pennsylvania should review the Pittsburgh mental health counselor certification requirements. In Texas, you can explore how to become a mental health counselor in Plano.

Carefully researching local licensure requirements and accredited online degree options will help you build a solid foundation for your psychology career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon Pennycook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles