World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan A. Fugelsang

Jonathan A. Fugelsang

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10853
World Ranking
4986
National Ranking
332

Jonathan A. Fugelsang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Fugelsang sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan A. Fugelsang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Fugelsang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan A. Fugelsang is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable contributions in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's recent work focuses on topics related to the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, and Gambling Behavior and Treatments.

Among their published papers are:

  • On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs (2020, Judgment and Decision Making)
  • The Bullshitting Frequency Scale: Development and psychometric properties (2020, British Journal of Social Psychology)
  • Controlling the narrative: Euphemistic language affects judgments of actions while avoiding perceptions of dishonesty (2021, Cognition)
  • 'You can't bullshit a bullshitter' (or can you?): Bullshitting frequency predicts receptivity to various types of misleading information (2021, British Journal of Social Psychology)
  • The search for predictable moral partners: Predictability and moral (character) preferences (2021, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)

Jonathan A. Fugelsang has frequently collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Alexander C. Walker
  • Derek J. Koehler
  • Martin Harry Turpin
  • Ethan Andrew Meyers
  • Evan F. Risko

Their publications are often featured in the following venues:

  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Cognition
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Journal of Gambling Studies
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Nathaniel Barr;Derek J. Koehler

  • Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Paul Seli;Derek J. Koehler

  • What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.

    Gordon Pennycook;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Derek J. Koehler

  • Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking

    Gordon Pennycook;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Derek J. Koehler

  • The brain in your pocket

    Nathaniel Barr;Gordon Pennycook;Jennifer A. Stolz;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Unknown

  • Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration

    Erin A. Maloney;Evan F. Risko;Daniel Ansari;Jonathan Fugelsang

  • Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis.

    Gordon Pennycook;Robert M. Ross;Derek J. Koehler;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • Frontopolar cortex mediates abstract integration in analogy.

    Adam E. Green;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;David J.M. Kraemer;Noah A. Shamosh

  • Connecting Long Distance: Semantic Distance in Analogical Reasoning Modulates Frontopolar Cortex Activity

    Adam E. Green;David J. M. Kraemer;David J. M. Kraemer;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Jeremy R. Gray

  • Losses disguised as wins in modern multi‐line video slot machines

    Mike J. Dixon;Kevin A. Harrigan;Rajwant Sandhu;Karen Collins

  • The effect of mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude

    Erin A Maloney;Daniel Ansari;Jonathan A Fugelsang

  • Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.

    Gordon Pennycook;Robert M. Ross;Robert M. Ross;Derek J. Koehler;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • Cognitive style and religiosity: the role of conflict detection.

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Nathaniel Barr;Derek J. Koehler

  • Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition

    Gordon Pennycook;James Allan Cheyne;Derek J. Koehler;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking

    Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Kevin N. Dunbar

  • Neural Correlates of Creativity in Analogical Reasoning

    Adam E. Green;David J. M. Kraemer;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Jeremy R. Gray

  • On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety

    Amanda M. Ferguson;Erin A. Maloney;Jonathan Fugelsang;Evan F. Risko

  • The good, the bad, and the ugly: An fMRI investigation of the functional anatomic correlates of stigma

    Anne C. Krendl;C. Neil Macrae;William M. Kelley;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • Reducing the Sex Difference in Math Anxiety: The Role of Spatial Processing Ability.

    Erin A. Maloney;Stephanie Waechter;Evan F. Risko;Jonathan A. Fugelsang

  • The emergence of consequential thought: evidence from neuroscience

    Abigail A Baird;Jonathan A Fugelsang

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek J. Koehler
Derek J. Koehler University of Waterloo
Mike J. Dixon
Mike J. Dixon University of Waterloo
Gordon Pennycook
Gordon Pennycook Cornell University
Kevin Dunbar
Kevin Dunbar University of Maryland, College Park
Evan F. Risko
Evan F. Risko University of Waterloo
Valerie A. Thompson
Valerie A. Thompson University of Saskatchewan
Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
Ori Friedman
Ori Friedman University of Waterloo
Paul M. Corballis
Paul M. Corballis University of Auckland
Daniel Ansari
Daniel Ansari University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities, particularly in the growing field of mental health counseling. In many communities, there is a strong demand for qualified professionals who are ready to support individuals facing mental health challenges.

To get started, exploring programs that align with local requirements is essential. For example, those wishing to become a mental health counselor in Fresno should look into region-specific counseling degrees and supervised experience. Similarly, researching how to become a mental health counselor in Garland can reveal local licensure paths and educational needs.

For those interested in Arizona, understanding how to become a mental health counselor in Gilbert and meeting mental health counselor requirements in Glendale can help guide academic and career planning.

Online degrees in psychology or counseling provide flexibility, making it easier to balance studies with work or personal commitments. As the field continues to evolve, staying informed about online options and local certification is crucial for long-term career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan A. Fugelsang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles