What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Cognition
- Social psychology
- Statistics
His primary areas of investigation include Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Social psychology, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Cognitive style.
His Cognitive psychology study incorporates themes from Knowledge base, Developmental psychology, Base rate fallacy, Social cognition and Neural correlates of consciousness.
The concepts of his Cognition study are interwoven with issues in Causality and Causal theory of reference.
Jonathan A. Fugelsang regularly ties together related areas like Numerical cognition in his Social psychology studies.
His work deals with themes such as Analogy and Functional imaging, which intersect with Functional magnetic resonance imaging.
In his study, Cognitive Reflection Test and Analytic reasoning is strongly linked to Religiosity, which falls under the umbrella field of Cognitive style.
His most cited work include:
- Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. (248 citations)
- Frontopolar cortex mediates abstract integration in analogy. (173 citations)
- What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. (162 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Slot machine and Perception.
His research integrates issues of Cognitive Reflection Test, Analytic reasoning and Cognitive style in his study of Social psychology.
His Cognitive style study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Religiosity, Everyday life and Morality.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Stimulus, Meaning, Need for cognition, Relation and Numerical cognition.
His Cognition research integrates issues from Developmental psychology, Inference and Causality.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Neural correlates of consciousness and Cognitive bias in addition to Perception.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (40.16%)
- Cognitive psychology (36.89%)
- Cognition (31.97%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Cognitive psychology (36.89%)
- Social psychology (40.16%)
- Cognition (31.97%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Jonathan A. Fugelsang mostly deals with Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Cognition, Scratch and Receptivity.
His Cognitive psychology study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Predictability.
He works in the field of Social psychology, namely Deception.
His Cognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Moral psychology, Bivariate analysis and Psychoanalysis.
The concepts of his Receptivity study are interwoven with issues in Relation, Pattern perception and Meaning.
His Association research integrates issues from Fake news and Cognitive style.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs (17 citations)
- Graphical Depiction of Statistical Information Improves Gambling-Related Judgments. (9 citations)
- No Evidence for Decreased Foreign Language Effect in Highly Proficient and Acculturated Bilinguals: A Commentary on Cavar and Tytus (2018). (9 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cognition
- Social psychology
- Statistics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Reflective thinking and Actuarial science.
His specific area of interest is Cognition, where Jonathan A. Fugelsang studies Cognitive Reflection Test.
While working in this field, Jonathan A. Fugelsang studies both Cognitive psychology and Irrational number.
His study brings together the fields of Belief revision and Social psychology.
Among his Reflective thinking studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Reflection, Empirical research, Narcissism, Need for cognition and Bivariate analysis.
His study connects Sunk costs and Actuarial science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
