World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7671 7157 47 42 123 5128
Neuroscience 42 7730 7132 26 24 130 5174

Paul M. Corballis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul M. Corballis between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul M. Corballis published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2018. 5 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2018. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications
1993 2025

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul M. Corballis: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 4
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 5
2001 8
2002 3
2003 5
2004 3
2005 8
2006 5
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 1
2014 8
2015 7
2016 7
2017 5
2018 9
2019 3
2020 5
2021 8
2022 4
2023 2
2024 0
2025 5
Total 138
Download as CSV

Paul M. Corballis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Corballis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul M. Corballis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Corballis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul M. Corballis is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main areas of study in their work include neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, as well as functional brain connectivity studies. Additional topics covered in their research involve multisensory perception and integration, face recognition and perception, and human-animal interaction studies.

Paul M. Corballis has contributed to several recent publications in various scientific venues. These include:

  • "Split-Brain: What We Know Now and Why This is Important for Understanding Consciousness" (2020) in Neuropsychology Review
  • "Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)" (2020) in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "Proactive Control of Emotional Distraction: Evidence From EEG Alpha Suppression" (2020) in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Seeing colour through language: Colour knowledge in the blind and sighted" (2021) in Visual Cognition
  • "Volcanic hazard map visualisation affects cognition and crisis decision-making" (2021) in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Their frequent co-authors include Michael C. Corballis, Karl Bridges, Alicja Nowacka, Christof Lutteroth, and Haiyang Jin. These collaborations highlight a pattern of teamwork across multiple publications.

Paul M. Corballis often publishes in venues such as Applied Ergonomics, Neuropsychology Review, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, and Visual Cognition. Their record shows multiple contributions to applied ergonomics, reflecting an interest in practical applications of cognitive and neural research.

Best Publications

  • The temporal cross-capture of audition and vision.

    Robert Fendrich;Paul M. Corballis

  • Shades of gray matter: noninvasive optical images of human brain responses during visual stimulation.

    Gabriele Gratton;Paul M. Corballis;Eunhee Cho;Monica Fabiani

  • Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter.

    Paul M. Corballis

  • Removing the heart from the brain: compensation for the pulse artifact in the photon migration signal.

    Gabriele Gratton;Paul M. Corballis

  • Fast and Localized Event-Related Optical Signals (EROS) in the Human Occipital Cortex: Comparisons with the Visual Evoked Potential and fMRI ☆

    Gabriele Gratton;Monica Fabiani;Paul M Corballis;Donald C Hood

  • Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality.

    Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Matthew E. Roser;Paul M. Corballis;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Prestimulus alpha power influences response criterion in a detection task.

    Katharina Limbach;Katharina Limbach;Paul M. Corballis

  • Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain.

    Matthew E. Roser;Jonathan A. Fugelsang;Kevin N. Dunbar;Paul M. Corballis

  • Rapid changes of optical parameters in the human brain during a tapping task

    Gabriele Gratton;Monica Fabiani;David Friedman;Maria Angela Franceschini

  • Hemispheric organization of visual memories

    Gabriele Gratton;Paul M. Corballis;Shamini Jain

  • Frontal theta cordance predicts 6-month antidepressant response to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study.

    James M Broadway;Paul E Holtzheimer;Paul E Holtzheimer;Matthew R Hilimire;Nathan A Parks

  • Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field.

    Paul M Corballis;Gabriele Gratton

  • Hemispheric asymmetries for simple visual judgments in the split brain

    Paul M Corballis;Margaret G Funnell;Michael S Gazzaniga

  • Insights into the functional specificity of the human corpus callosum.

    Margaret G. Funnell;Paul M. Corballis;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Cortical and Subcortical Interhemispheric Interactions Following Partial and Complete Callosotomy

    Margaret G. Funnell;Paul M. Corballis;Michael S. Gazzaniga

  • Language, gesture, and handedness: Evidence for independent lateralized networks.

    Isabelle S. Häberling;Paul M. Corballis;Michael C. Corballis

  • Split brain: divided perception but undivided consciousness.

    Yair Pinto;David A. Neville;Marte Otten;Paul M. Corballis

  • Toward noninvasive 3-D imaging of the time course of cortical activity: investigation of the depth of the event-related optical signal.

    Gabriele Gratton;Anita Sarno;Ed Maclin;Paul M. Corballis

  • Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer

    Robert P. O’Shea;Paul M. Corballis

  • Competitive interaction degrades target selection: An ERP study

    Matthew R. Hilimire;Jeffrey R. W. Mounts;Nathan A. Parks;Paul M. Corballis

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
Gabriele Gratton
Gabriele Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael C. Corballis
Michael C. Corballis University of Auckland
Monica Fabiani
Monica Fabiani University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mara Fabri
Mara Fabri Marche Polytechnic University
Paul E. Holtzheimer
Paul E. Holtzheimer Dartmouth College
David Friedman
David Friedman Columbia University
Kevin Dunbar
Kevin Dunbar University of Maryland, College Park
Jonathan A. Fugelsang
Jonathan A. Fugelsang University of Waterloo
Enrico Gratton
Enrico Gratton University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to a range of related careers and educational pathways. For those interested in clinical psychology, pursuing an online psyd can prepare you for a hands-on role as a licensed psychologist. This is ideal for students wanting a practice-focused doctoral program.

If your interest leans towards family and group therapy, consider accelerated mft programs online. These programs allow you to quickly gain credentials in marriage and family therapy, opening doors to in-demand counseling careers.

Time-efficient learners may prefer 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees. These fast-track options let you earn a bachelor’s in related fields like psychology or biology, minimizing time and cost while boosting employability.

Finally, if future salary is a priority, research the highest paying degrees. Understanding earning potential across related bioscience and health disciplines can help you make informed academic choices linked to rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Corballis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles