World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4009
World Ranking
14076
National Ranking
5582

Bradley Huffaker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Huffaker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 76 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bradley Huffaker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley Huffaker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley Huffaker is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Sociology and Political Science, and Strategy and Management.

The scholar's recent publication record includes work on topics such as internet interconnection, geolocation, data protection regulation, programmable data planes, and network name extraction. Notable papers are:

  • The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on internet interconnection (2020, Telecommunications Policy)
  • RIPE IPmap active geolocation (2020, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review)
  • The Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on Internet Interconnection (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • Dynamic Property Enforcement in Programmable Data Planes (2021, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking)
  • Learning Regexes to Extract Network Names from Hostnames (2021, Asian Internet Engineering Conference)

Bradley's research topics cover a range of areas, including:

  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Network Packet Processing and Optimization
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G

Frequent co-authors involved in Bradley Huffaker's publications include kc claffy, Alexander Marder, Matthew Luckie, Alex C. Snoeren, and Ricky K. P. Mok.

Bradley's work has been published in several academic venues, including:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
  • Telecommunications Policy
  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The range of publication venues and the diversity of topics indicate a multidisciplinary approach to research within computer science. The focus on network analysis, data protection, and security aligns with contemporary concerns in internet infrastructure and regulation.

Best Publications

  • AS relationships: inference and validation

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • AS relationships, customer cones, and validation

    Matthew Luckie;Bradley Huffaker;Amogh Dhamdhere;Vasileios Giotsas

  • Orbis: rescaling degree correlations to generate annotated internet topologies

    Priya Mahadevan;Calvin Hubble;Dmitri Krioukov;Bradley Huffaker

  • Topology discovery by active probing

    B. Huffaker;D. Plummer;D. Moore;K. Claffy

  • The Internet AS-Level Topology: Three Data Sources and One Definitive Metric

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • Distance Metrics in the Internet

    Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov;Daniel Plummer;David Moore

  • Traceroute probe method and forward IP path inference

    Matthew Luckie;Young Hyun;Bradley Huffaker

  • Measuring the deployment of IPv6: topology, routing and performance

    Amogh Dhamdhere;Matthew Luckie;Bradley Huffaker;kc claffy

  • A look at router geolocation in public and commercial databases

    Manaf Gharaibeh;Anant Shah;Bradley Huffaker;Han Zhang

  • On routing asymmetry in the Internet

    Yihua He;M. Faloutsos;S. Krishnamurthy;B. Huffaker

  • Inferring Complex AS Relationships

    Vasileios Giotsas;Matthew Luckie;Bradley Huffaker;kc claffy

  • Lessons from Three Views of the Internet Topology

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri V. Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • Challenges in Inferring Internet Interdomain Congestion

    Matthew Luckie;Amogh Dhamdhere;David Clark;Bradley Huffaker

  • Identifying IPv6 network problems in the dual-stack world

    Kenjiro Cho;Matthew Luckie;Bradley Huffaker

  • Geocompare: a comparison of public and commercial geolocation databases

    Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov

  • Inferring AS relationships: dead end or lively beginning?

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Bradley Huffaker;kc claffy

  • Two days in the life of the DNS anycast root servers

    Ziqian Liu;Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov;Nevil Brownlee

  • Macroscopic analyses of the infrastructure: measurement and visualization of Internet connectivity and performance

    Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov;David Moore;kc claffy

  • DRoP: DNS-based router positioning

    Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov;kc claffy

  • Otter: A general-purpose network visualization tool

    Bradley Huffaker;Evi Nemeth;kc claffy

  • Toward topology dualism: improving the accuracy of AS annotations for routers

    Bradley Huffaker;Amogh Dhamdhere;Marina Fomenkov;Kc Claffy

  • Pushing the Boundaries with bdrmapIT: Mapping Router Ownership at Internet Scale

    Alexander Marder;Matthew Luckie;Amogh Dhamdhere;Bradley Huffaker

  • Geocompare: a comparison of public and commercial geolocation databases - Technical Report

    Bradley Huffaker;Marina Fomenkov;kc claffy

  • Lessons from Three Views of the Internet Topology: Technical Report

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

Frequent Co-Authors

Dmitri Krioukov
Dmitri Krioukov Northeastern University
Xenofontas Dimitropoulos
Xenofontas Dimitropoulos University of Crete
Kimberly C. Claffy
Kimberly C. Claffy University of California San Diego
George F. Riley
George F. Riley Georgia Institute of Technology
David J. Moore
David J. Moore University of California, San Diego
Alex C. Snoeren
Alex C. Snoeren University of California, San Diego
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Shane Greenstein
Shane Greenstein Harvard University
Kirill Levchenko
Kirill Levchenko University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of computer science education is evolving rapidly, especially with the surge in online learning. For those seeking flexibility and faster completion, an accelerated computer science degree online offers an efficient path to a rewarding tech career. These programs provide robust computer science fundamentals and are ideal for motivated individuals eager to enter the workforce quickly.

Related fields, such as engineering and physics, are also readily accessible through online study. Pursuing an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering equips students with the skills to tackle sustainability challenges through innovative technology. Alternatively, if mechanical design and manufacturing appeal to you, an online degree for mechanical engineering is a practical option for building advanced technical expertise.

Learners interested in the fundamental laws of nature can explore online physics degrees, blending theory with real-world problem-solving. These pathways open doors to diverse careers in research, engineering, and technology, expanding your horizon far beyond computer science alone.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley Huffaker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles