World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
15954
World Ranking
3394
National Ranking
1647

Alex C. Snoeren publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex C. Snoeren sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alex C. Snoeren D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex C. Snoeren sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to management and security of networked systems
  • 2018 - ACM Fellow For innovative approaches to measuring, managing and directing network traffic
  • 2009 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Alex C. Snoeren is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant work in computer networks and communications, artificial intelligence, hardware and architecture, electrical and electronic engineering, and information systems.

Their work spans several key topics related to network analysis and optimization, including:

  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Network Packet Processing and Optimization
  • Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques

Snoeren's recent publications illustrate diverse research interests and contributions. Selected papers include:

  • "RIPE IPmap active geolocation" (2020), published in ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • "Optical networking within the Lightwave Energy-Efficient Datacenter project [Invited]" (2020), published in Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • "Network topology facilitates internet traffic control in autocracies" (2024), published in PNAS Nexus
  • "Rosebud: Making FPGA-Accelerated Middlebox Development More Pleasant" (2022), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Trackers Bounce Back: Measuring Evasion of Partitioned Storage in the Wild" (2022), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors in Snoeren's research include Bradley Huffaker, kc claffy, Alexander Gamero-Garrido, Esteban Carisimo, and Alberto Dainotti. Collaborations with these researchers reflect recurring themes in network measurement and security.

Publications are commonly featured in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • PNAS Nexus

Snoeren has received several professional recognitions, including being named an IEEE Fellow in 2020 for contributions to the management and security of networked systems. Earlier, in 2018, they were appointed an ACM Fellow for innovative approaches to measuring, managing, and directing network traffic. Additionally, they were a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Hash-based IP traceback

    Alex C. Snoeren;Craig Partridge;Luis A. Sanchez;Christine E. Jones

  • Inside the Social Network's (Datacenter) Network

    Arjun Roy;Hongyi Zeng;Jasmeet Bagga;George Porter

  • An end-to-end approach to host mobility

    Alex C. Snoeren;Hari Balakrishnan

  • Single-packet IP traceback

    Alex C. Snoeren;Craig Partridge;Luis A. Sanchez;Christine E. Jones

  • Difference engine: harnessing memory redundancy in virtual machines

    Diwaker Gupta;Sangmin Lee;Michael Vrable;Stefan Savage

  • Difference engine: harnessing memory redundancy in virtual machines

    Diwaker Gupta;Sangmin Lee;Michael Vrable;Stefan Savage

  • Scalability, fidelity, and containment in the potemkin virtual honeyfarm

    Michael Vrable;Justin Ma;Jay Chen;David Moore

  • Jigsaw: solving the puzzle of enterprise 802.11 analysis

    Yu-Chung Cheng;John Bellardo;Péter Benkö;Alex C. Snoeren

  • Mesh-based content routing using XML

    Alex C. Snoeren;Kenneth Conley;David K. Gifford

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of model-based power characterization

    John C. McCullough;Yuvraj Agarwal;Jaideep Chandrashekar;Sathyanarayan Kuppuswamy

  • Cloud control with distributed rate limiting

    Barath Raghavan;Kashi Vishwanath;Sriram Ramabhadran;Kenneth Yocum

  • Fault Localization via Risk Modeling

    R R Kompella;J Yates;A Greenberg;A C Snoeren

  • IP fault localization via risk modeling

    Ramana Rao Kompella;Jennifer Yates;Albert Greenberg;Alex C. Snoeren

  • To infinity and beyond: time-warped network emulation

    Diwaker Gupta;Kenneth Yocum;Marvin McNett;Alex C. Snoeren

  • RotorNet: A Scalable, Low-complexity, Optical Datacenter Network

    William M. Mellette;Rob McGuinness;Arjun Roy;Alex Forencich

  • Resource Allocation in Federated Distributed Computing Infrastructures

    Alvin AuYoung;Brent N. Chun;Alex C. Snoeren;Amin Vahdat

  • Best-path vs. multi-path overlay routing

    David G. Andersen;Alex C. Snoeren;Hari Balakrishnan

  • Mirage: a microeconomic resource allocation system for sensornet testbeds

    B.N. Chun;P. Buonadonna;A. AuYoung;Chaki Ng

  • Inside the Social Network's (Datacenter) Network

    Unknown

  • Hash-based IP traceback

    Unknown

  • California fault lines: understanding the causes and impact of network failures

    Daniel Turner;Kirill Levchenko;Alex C. Snoeren;Stefan Savage

  • Detection and Localization of Network Black Holes

    R.R. Kompella;J. Yates;A. Greenberg;A.C. Snoeren

Frequent Co-Authors

Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Geoffrey M. Voelker
Geoffrey M. Voelker University of California, San Diego
Stefan Savage
Stefan Savage University of California, San Diego
George Porter
George Porter University of California, San Diego
Kirill Levchenko
Kirill Levchenko University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Craig Partridge
Craig Partridge Colorado State University
George Varghese
George Varghese University of California, Los Angeles
David G. Andersen
David G. Andersen Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science opens up a range of flexible and high-potential career pathways. For those seeking to quickly enter the workforce, considering the fastest degree to get online can be a smart move. These accelerated programs often allow students to complete their studies in a shorter timeframe and start earning sooner.

Budget is another key issue. If affordability is a top concern, pursuing the cheapest online master's in artificial intelligence can enable you to gain valuable, in-demand skills without breaking the bank.

When mapping out your long-term goals, it helps to know which fields are on the rise. Reviewing the top degrees in demand for the future can guide you toward programs and specializations likely to lead to strong career opportunities.

Lastly, some professionals may prefer a less intensive route. Considering the easy masters degrees available online provides options for those balancing work and study, or looking for a manageable path to upskill.

Best Scientists Citing Alex C. Snoeren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles