World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
84
Citations
32131
World Ranking
842
National Ranking
459

Geoffrey M. Voelker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey M. Voelker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 207 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Geoffrey M. Voelker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey M. Voelker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Fellow For contributions to empirical measurement and analysis in systems, networking and security

Overview

Geoffrey M. Voelker is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions to subfields including Information Systems, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's recent papers cover a range of topics related to security, network infrastructure, and technology disruptions. Notable publications include:

  • No Privacy Among Spies: Assessing the Functionality and Insecurity of Consumer Android Spyware Apps (2023), published in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Characterization of Anycast Adoption in the DNS Authoritative Infrastructure (2021), published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Measuring security practices (2022), published in Communications of the ACM
  • Patient Care Technology Disruptions Associated With the CrowdStrike Outage (2025), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Hopper: Modeling and Detecting Lateral Movement (Extended Report) (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors include Stefan Savage, Gautam Akiwate, Enze Liu, Grant Ho, and Mattijs Jonker. Collaboration with these researchers reflects a continuing engagement with topics in security, network analysis, and malware detection.

Publication venues where this scientist has regularly contributed are diverse, with multiple papers appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Communications of the ACM, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, and JAMA Network Open. This distribution indicates an active presence in both academic and interdisciplinary platforms.

Their work emphasizes several main topics, notably:

  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Digital and Cyber Forensics

Recognition of their contributions includes the ACM Fellow award received in 2017 for work in empirical measurement and analysis within systems, networking, and security domains.

Best Publications

  • Inferring Internet denial-of-service activity

    David Moore;Colleen Shannon;Douglas J. Brown;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • A fistful of bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names

    Sarah Meiklejohn;Marjori Pomarole;Grant Jordan;Kirill Levchenko

  • Inferring internet denial-of-service activity

    David Moore;Geoffrey M. Voelker;Stefan Savage

  • On the placement of Web server replicas

    Lili Qiu;V.N. Padmanabhan;G.M. Voelker

  • Beyond blacklists: learning to detect malicious web sites from suspicious URLs

    Justin Ma;Lawrence K. Saul;Stefan Savage;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Internet quarantine: requirements for containing self-propagating code

    D. Moore;C. Shannon;G.M. Voelker;S. Savage

  • On the scale and performance of cooperative Web proxy caching

    Alec Wolman;M. Voelker;Nitin Sharma;Neal Cardwell

  • Characterizing user behavior and network performance in a public wireless LAN

    Anand Balachandran;Geoffrey M. Voelker;Paramvir Bahl;P. Venkat Rangan

  • Understanding Availability

    Ranjita Bhagwan;Stefan Savage;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Identifying suspicious URLs: an application of large-scale online learning

    Justin Ma;Lawrence K. Saul;Stefan Savage;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Total recall: system support for automated availability management

    Ranjita Bhagwan;Kiran Tati;Yu-Chung Cheng;Stefan Savage

  • Spamalytics: an empirical analysis of spam marketing conversion

    Chris Kanich;Christian Kreibich;Kirill Levchenko;Brandon Enright

  • Difference engine: harnessing memory redundancy in virtual machines

    Diwaker Gupta;Sangmin Lee;Michael Vrable;Stefan Savage

  • End-to-end differentiation of congestion and wireless losses

    Song Cen;Pamela C. Cosman;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Difference engine: harnessing memory redundancy in virtual machines

    Diwaker Gupta;Sangmin Lee;Michael Vrable;Stefan Savage

  • Sora: high-performance software radio using general-purpose multi-core processors

    Kun Tan;He Liu;Jiansong Zhang;Yongguang Zhang

  • Detour: informed Internet routing and transport

    S. Savage;T. Anderson;A. Aggarwal;D. Becker

  • Scalability, fidelity, and containment in the potemkin virtual honeyfarm

    Michael Vrable;Justin Ma;Jay Chen;David Moore

  • On the scale and performance of cooperative Web proxy caching

    Unknown

  • Access and mobility of wireless PDA users

    Marvin McNett;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Measurement and analysis of a streaming-media workload

    Maureen Chesire;Alec Wolman;Geoffrey M. Voelker;Henry M. Levy

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Savage
Stefan Savage University of California, San Diego
Kirill Levchenko
Kirill Levchenko University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Alex C. Snoeren
Alex C. Snoeren University of California, San Diego
Damon McCoy
Damon McCoy New York University
Vern Paxson
Vern Paxson University of California, Berkeley
Lawrence K. Saul
Lawrence K. Saul University of California, San Diego
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Henry M. Levy
Henry M. Levy University of Washington
Pamela C. Cosman
Pamela C. Cosman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens a door to a variety of online degree and career options. Many students seek cost-effective paths, and there are affordable online MBA programs for those interested in combining technical skills with business leadership. These MBAs can boost career advancement in management and tech fields alike.

If speed and flexibility matter, the best one year masters programs allow you to gain a graduate qualification fast, ideal for career switchers or upskillers. Likewise, choosing the fastest degree to get online helps accelerate entry into high-demand tech careers without long commitments.

For those passionate about cutting-edge technology, the rise of ai degrees online enables in-depth study of artificial intelligence in a flexible and affordable manner. By selecting the right online pathway, you can tailor your education to your career goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey M. Voelker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles