World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
7068
World Ranking
13383
National Ranking
5358

George Porter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Porter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 81 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

George Porter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Porter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Porter is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research portfolio spans key areas within computer science and engineering, with a primary focus on cloud computing and advanced networking technologies.

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, Porter's research is concentrated on several subfields of study, such as:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture

The core topics that characterize their research output involve:

  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Green IT and Sustainability
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Porter has contributed to various publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their recent papers illustrate their ongoing work in the field:

  • "Optical networking within the Lightwave Energy-Efficient Datacenter project [Invited]" (2020), published in the Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • "Something Old, Something New: Extending the Life of CPUs in Datacenters" (2023), published in ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
  • "TerraWatt: Sustaining Sustainable Computing of Containers in Containers" (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Throughout their career, Porter has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • William M. Mellette
  • Alex Forencich
  • Jason Kelley
  • Joseph E. Ford
  • Alex C. Snoeren

Best Publications

  • Helios: a hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers

    Nathan Farrington;George Porter;Sivasankar Radhakrishnan;Hamid Hajabdolali Bazzaz

  • Inside the Social Network's (Datacenter) Network

    Arjun Roy;Hongyi Zeng;Jasmeet Bagga;George Porter

  • c-Through: part-time optics in data centers

    Guohui Wang;David G. Andersen;Michael Kaminsky;Konstantina Papagiannaki

  • X-trace: a pervasive network tracing framework

    Rodrigo Fonseca;George Porter;Randy H. Katz;Scott Shenker

  • Integrating microsecond circuit switching into the data center

    George Porter;Richard Strong;Nathan Farrington;Alex Forencich

  • Helios

    Unknown

  • Chronos: predictable low latency for data center applications

    Rishi Kapoor;George Porter;Malveeka Tewari;Geoffrey M. Voelker

  • Encoding, fast and slow: low-latency video processing using thousands of tiny threads

    Sadjad Fouladi;Riad S. Wahby;Brennan Shacklett;Karthikeyan Vasuki Balasubramaniam

  • RotorNet: A Scalable, Low-complexity, Optical Datacenter Network

    William M. Mellette;Rob McGuinness;Arjun Roy;Alex Forencich

  • Inside the Social Network's (Datacenter) Network

    Unknown

  • Sprocket: A Serverless Video Processing Framework

    Lixiang Ao;Liz Izhikevich;Geoffrey M. Voelker;George Porter

  • Circuit switching under the radar with REACToR

    He Liu;Feng Lu;Alex Forencich;Rishi Kapoor

  • Scale-Out Networking in the Data Center

    A Vahdat;M Al-Fares;N Farrington;R N Mysore

  • The SAHARA Model for Service Composition across Multiple Providers

    Bhaskaran Raman;Sharad Agarwal;Yan Chen;Matthew Caesar

  • Scheduling techniques for hybrid circuit/packet networks

    He Liu;Matthew K. Mukerjee;Conglong Li;Nicolas Feltman

  • xOMB: extensible open middleboxes with commodity servers

    James W. Anderson;Ryan Braud;Rishi Kapoor;George Porter

  • Themis: an I/O-efficient MapReduce

    Alexander Rasmussen;Michael Conley;George Porter

  • Integrating microsecond circuit switching into the data center

    Unknown

  • SENIC: scalable NIC for end-host rate limiting

    Sivasankar Radhakrishnan;Yilong Geng;Vimalkumar Jeyakumar;Abdul Kabbani

  • TritonSort: a balanced large-scale sorting system

    Alexander Rasmussen;George Porter;Michael Conley;Harsha V. Madhyastha

  • Switching the optical divide: fundamental challenges for hybrid electrical/optical datacenter networks

    Hamid Hajabdolali Bazzaz;Malveeka Tewari;Guohui Wang;George Porter

  • A Multiport Microsecond Optical Circuit Switch for Data Center Networking

    Nathan Farrington;Alex Forencich;George Porter;P.-C. Sun

  • Bullet trains: a study of NIC burst behavior at microsecond timescales

    Rishi Kapoor;Alex C. Snoeren;Geoffrey M. Voelker;George Porter

  • Corundum: An Open-Source 100-Gbps Nic

    Alex Forencich;Alex C. Snoeren;George Porter;George Papen

  • Expanding across time to deliver bandwidth efficiency and low latency

    William M. Mellette;Rajdeep Das;Yibo Guo;Rob McGuinness

Frequent Co-Authors

Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Alex C. Snoeren
Alex C. Snoeren University of California, San Diego
Yeshaiahu Fainman
Yeshaiahu Fainman University of California, San Diego
Geoffrey M. Voelker
Geoffrey M. Voelker University of California, San Diego
Joseph E. Ford
Joseph E. Ford University of California, San Diego
Randy H. Katz
Randy H. Katz University of California, Berkeley
Ion Stoica
Ion Stoica University of California, Berkeley
Harsha V. Madhyastha
Harsha V. Madhyastha University of Southern California
Anthony L. Lentine
Anthony L. Lentine Sandia National Laboratories
Scott Shenker
Scott Shenker University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a variety of paths, both academically and professionally. Related degrees such as a data science degree are in high demand, offering strong career prospects for graduates interested in analytics, machine learning, and big data.

If you are drawn to innovation and technology, pursuing one of the best online electrical engineering programs USA can greatly enhance your technical expertise and job opportunities. Online learning provides flexibility, which is highly valued by working professionals and international students alike.

For those seeking quicker entry into the workforce, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certifications focus on key skills that employers need right now, offering both affordability and speed.

Finally, if your goal is to upskill fast, consider the quickest online masters degree options. Completing a master’s in a shorter time frame can lead to faster promotions, higher salaries, and more specialized roles in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing George Porter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles