World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudia Notarnicola

Claudia Notarnicola

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8460
World Ranking
6055
National Ranking
115

Claudia Notarnicola publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Notarnicola sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 362 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Claudia Notarnicola D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Notarnicola sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia Notarnicola is affiliated with the European Academy of Bozen in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, focusing extensively on subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Environmental Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

The scientist's work addresses a wide range of topics, including:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Climate variability and models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Recent publications prominently feature contributions to climate and cryosphere research. Notable papers include:

  • "Climate Changes and Their Elevational Patterns in the Mountains of the World," 2022, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Hotspots of snow cover changes in global mountain regions over 2000-2018," 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019," 2021, The Cryosphere
  • "Validation of Soil Moisture Data Products From the NASA SMAP Mission," 2021, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • "Sentinel-1 InSAR Coherence for Land Cover Mapping: A Comparison of Multiple Feature-Based Classifiers," 2020, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Frequent coauthors with whom the scientist has collaborated multiple times include Carlo Marín, Ludovica De Gregorio, Giovanni Cuozzo, Alice Crespi, and Giacomo Bertoldi.

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing
  • The Cryosphere
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium

Best Publications

  • Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites

    A. Colliander;T.J. Jackson;R. Bindlish;S. Chan

  • Climate Changes and Their Elevational Patterns in the Mountains of the World

    Unknown

  • Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Biomass and Soil Moisture Retrievals from Remote Sensing Data

    Iftikhar Ali;Felix Greifeneder;Jelena Stamenkovic;Maxim Neumann

  • Soil moisture mapping using Sentinel-1 images: Algorithm and preliminary validation

    S. Paloscia;S. Pettinato;E. Santi;C. Notarnicola

  • Hotspots of snow cover changes in global mountain regions over 2000???2018

    Claudia Notarnicola

  • Multitemporal C-band radar measurements on wheat fields

    F. Mattia;T. Le Toan;G. Picard;F.I. Posa

  • Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019

    Michael Matiu;Alice Crespi;Giacomo Bertoldi;Carlo Maria Carmagnola

  • Soil Moisture Retrieval From Remotely Sensed Data: Neural Network Approach Versus Bayesian Method

    C. Notarnicola;M. Angiulli;F. Posa

  • The bathymetry of a Titan sea

    Marco Mastrogiuseppe;Valerio Poggiali;Alexander Hayes;Ralph Lorenz

  • Estimating Soil Moisture With the Support Vector Regression Technique

    L. Pasolli;C. Notarnicola;L. Bruzzone

  • Use of radar and optical remotely sensed data for soil moisture retrieval over vegetated areas

    C. Notarnicola;M. Angiulli;F. Posa

  • Statistical analysis for assessing shallow-landslide susceptibility in South Tyrol (south-eastern Alps, Italy)

    Daniela Piacentini;Francesco Troiani;Mauro Soldati;Claudia Notarnicola

  • Overall negative trends for snow cover extent and duration in global mountain regions over 1982–2020

    Unknown

  • Estimation of soil moisture patterns in mountain grasslands by means of SAR RADARSAT2 images and hydrological modeling

    Giacomo Bertoldi;Stefano Della Chiesa;Claudia Notarnicola;Luca Pasolli

  • Topographical and ecohydrological controls on land surface temperature in an alpine catchment

    G. Bertoldi;C. Notarnicola;G. Leitinger;S. Endrizzi

  • A Comparison of Pixel- and Object-Based Glacier Classification With Optical Satellite Images

    Philipp Rastner;Tobias Bolch;Claudia Notarnicola;Frank Paul

  • Active shoreline of Ontario Lacus, Titan: A morphological study of the lake and its surroundings

    S. Wall;A. Hayes;Charlie S. Bristow;R. Lorenz

  • Synergetic Use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data for Soil Moisture Mapping at Plot Scale

    Reza Attarzadeh;Jalal Amini;Claudia Notarnicola;Felix Greifeneder

  • Snow Cover Maps from MODIS Images at 250 m Resolution, Part 1: Algorithm Description

    Claudia Notarnicola;Martial Duguay;Nico Moelg;Thomas Schellenberger

  • Sentinel-1 InSAR Coherence for Land Cover Mapping: A Comparison of Multiple Feature-Based Classifiers

    Alexander W. Jacob;Claudia Notarnicola;Gopika Suresh;Oleg Antropov

  • Area and volume loss of the glaciers in the Ortles-Cevedale group (Eastern Italian Alps): controls and imbalance of the remaining glaciers

    L. Carturan;R. Filippi;R. Seppi;P. Gabrielli

  • Validation of Soil Moisture Data Products from the NASA SMAP Mission

    Andreas Colliander;Rolf Reichle;Wade Crow;Michael Cosh

  • Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps 1971 to 2019

    Michael Matiu;Alice Crespi;Giacomo Bertoldi;Carlo Maria Carmagnola

Frequent Co-Authors

Simonetta Paloscia
Simonetta Paloscia National Research Council (CNR)
Lorenzo Bruzzone
Lorenzo Bruzzone University of Trento
Ulrike Tappeiner
Ulrike Tappeiner University of Innsbruck
Jonathan I. Lunine
Jonathan I. Lunine Jet Propulsion Lab
Alexander G. Hayes
Alexander G. Hayes Cornell University
Nazzareno Pierdicca
Nazzareno Pierdicca Sapienza University of Rome
Ralph D. Lorenz
Ralph D. Lorenz Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Howard A. Zebker
Howard A. Zebker Stanford University
Jouni Pulliainen
Jouni Pulliainen Finnish Meteorological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA offers diverse opportunities for specialization and career growth. For those interested in advanced education, online EdS to EdD programs offer flexible paths to leadership roles in education and environmental policy. These programs equip students with skills to influence environmental curricula and community outreach.

Another growing field is social work, where online DSW programs in social work prepare graduates to address environmental justice and community health challenges. Combining environmental sciences with social work expands career options in nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and advocacy groups.

For students seeking budget-friendly options, pursuing a budget friendly online general studies degree can provide a broad foundation before specializing. This approach allows flexibility while exploring interdisciplinary aspects of environmental studies.

Additionally, many look for the easiest bachelor's degree programs online to balance education with work or other commitments. These programs often offer tailored pathways that incorporate environmental topics with manageable workloads, ideal for busy students.

Exploring available options such as eds to edd programs online, online dsw programs in social work, budget friendly online general studies degree, and easiest bachelor's degree helps students select the best route for their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Notarnicola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles