World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7281
World Ranking
9257
National Ranking
66

Dejan Kostic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dejan Kostic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 114 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dejan Kostic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dejan Kostic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dejan Kostic is affiliated with the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their recent publication record includes works published in various venues, highlighting ongoing research activity across several topics. Notable recent papers include:

  • NetConfEval: Can LLMs Facilitate Network Configuration? (2024) published in Proceedings of the ACM on Networking
  • Path persistence in the cloud (2020) published in ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • Cheetah: A High-Speed Programmable Load-Balancer Framework With Guaranteed Per-Connection-Consistency (2021) published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • Making Network Configuration Human Friendly (2023) published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Metron (2020) published in ACM Transactions on Computer Systems

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kostic include:

  • Marco Chiesa
  • Gerald Q. Maguire
  • Alireza Farshin
  • Magnus Boman
  • Mariano Scazzariello

Kostic has contributed to several publication venues multiple times, with a significant number of papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Networking
  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • ACM Transactions on Computer Systems

The scientific topics that Kostic has addressed span a range of areas related to both foundational and applied research, including:

  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Software Engineering Research

This diversity in research topics and publication venues indicates an engagement with both networking technologies and systems design principles, as well as interdisciplinary applications that bridge computing systems and medical data analysis.

Best Publications

  • Bullet: high bandwidth data dissemination using an overlay mesh

    Dejan Kostić;Adolfo Rodriguez;Jeannie Albrecht;Amin Vahdat

  • Scalability and accuracy in a large-scale network emulator

    Amin Vahdat;Ken Yocum;Kevin Walsh;Priya Mahadevan

  • A NICE way to test openflow applications

    Marco Canini;Daniele Venzano;Peter Perešíni;Dejan Kostić

  • Scalability and accuracy in a large-scale network emulator

    Unknown

  • DeepDive: transparently identifying and managing performance interference in virtualized environments

    Dejan Novaković;Nedeljko Vasić;Stanko Novaković;Dejan Kostić

  • What You Need to Know About SDN Flow Tables

    Maciej Kuzniar;Peter Peresini;Dejan Kostic

  • DejaVu: accelerating resource allocation in virtualized environments

    Nedeljko Vasić;Dejan Novaković;Svetozar Miučin;Dejan Kostić

  • Energy-aware traffic engineering

    Nedeljko Vasić;Dejan Kostić

  • MACEDON: methodology for automatically creating, evaluating, and designing overlay networks

    Adolfo Rodriguez;Charles Killian;Sooraj Bhat;Dejan Kostić

  • Accelerating resource allocation in virtualized environments using workload classes and/or workload signatures

    Nedeljko Vasic;Dejan Novakovic;Dejan Kostic;Svetozar Miucin

  • Using random subsets to build scalable network services

    Dejan Kostić;Adolfo Rodriguez;Jeannie Albrecht;Abhijeet Bhirud

  • A SOFT way for openflow switch interoperability testing

    Maciej Kuzniar;Peter Peresini;Marco Canini;Daniele Venzano

  • CrystalBall: predicting and preventing inconsistencies in deployed distributed systems

    Maysam Yabandeh;Nikola Knezevic;Dejan Kostic;Viktor Kuncak

  • Identifying and using energy-critical paths

    Nedeljko Vasić;Prateek Bhurat;Dejan Novaković;Marco Canini

  • Metron: NFV Service Chains at the True Speed of the Underlying Hardware

    Georgios P. Katsikas;Tom Barbette;Dejan Kostic;Rebecca Steinert

  • Opus: an overlay peer utility service

    R. Braynard;D. Kostic;A. Rodriguez;J. Chase

  • Maintaining high bandwidth under dynamic network conditions

    Dejan Kostić;Ryan Braud;Charles Killian;Erik Vandekieft

  • Staged deployment in mirage, an integrated software upgrade testing and distribution system

    Olivier Crameri;Nikola Knezevic;Dejan Kostic;Ricardo Bianchini

  • Enabling DVD-like features in P2P video-on-demand systems

    Nevena Vratonjić;Priya Gupta;Nikola Knežević;Dejan Kostić

  • Making cluster applications energy-aware

    Nedeljko Vasić;Martin Barisits;Vincent Salzgeber;Dejan Kostic

  • Scalability and accuracy in a large-scale network emulator

    Ken Yocum;Kevin Walsh;Amin Vahdat;Priya Mahadevan

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Canini
Marco Canini King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Gerald Q. Maguire Jr.
Gerald Q. Maguire Jr. Royal Institute of Technology
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Ricardo Bianchini
Ricardo Bianchini Microsoft (United States)
Viktor Kuncak
Viktor Kuncak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Willy Zwaenepoel
Willy Zwaenepoel University of Sydney
Jeffrey S. Chase
Jeffrey S. Chase Duke University
Nikolaos Laoutaris
Nikolaos Laoutaris Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Pablo Rodriguez
Pablo Rodriguez Telefónica (Spain)
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a range of related academic and career pathways. For those still considering their options, looking at college majors can help you identify fields with high demand and career growth. Beyond undergraduate studies, graduate programs offer further specialization and advancement.

Many students seek efficient routes to advance their education. Options such as easy masters degree programs can make it possible to upskill in less time and with manageable coursework. For those aiming for the highest credentials, flexibility and affordability are priorities. You might consider some of the most affordable online phd programs to balance cost with quality.

If your interests align with educational leadership or higher education, there are also accelerated doctoral programs in education online. These fast-track programs allow professionals to earn doctoral credentials efficiently, helping you reach career goals sooner. Exploring these pathways ensures you find an academic journey that matches both your aspirations and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Dejan Kostic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles