World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8919 8330 523 512 129 5410

Peter A. Newcombe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter A. Newcombe between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter A. Newcombe published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 8 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1995 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter A. Newcombe: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 5
2005 3
2006 4
2007 10
2008 8
2009 3
2010 7
2011 6
2012 14
2013 10
2014 9
2015 14
2016 8
2017 12
2018 9
2019 11
2020 6
2021 6
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 4
Total 170
Download as CSV

Peter A. Newcombe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Newcombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter A. Newcombe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Newcombe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter A. Newcombe is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and focuses on medical research with particular emphasis in several subfields. Their primary area of study is Medicine, encompassing 40 publications, with specific contributions found in Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Physiology.

The scientist's research topics include several specialized areas. These consist of:

  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

Peter A. Newcombe's frequent publication venues highlight a focus on respiratory and sports medicine as well as injury-related research. These venues include:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport
  • Injury
  • Journal of Family Studies
  • Body Image

Their recent papers feature research in cough physiology and associated health complications, published predominantly in the CHEST Journal. Notable papers include:

  • "Global Physiology and Pathophysiology of Cough," 2020, CHEST Journal
  • "Life-Threatening and Non-Life-Threatening Complications Associated With Coughing," 2020, CHEST Journal
  • "Acute Cough Due to Acute Bronchitis in Immunocompetent Adult Outpatients," 2020, CHEST Journal
  • "Global Physiology and Pathophysiology of Cough," 2021, CHEST Journal
  • "Australian health professionals' perspectives of psychosocial adjustment to visible differences: A qualitative analysis of pediatric populations," 2020, Body Image

Frequent collaborators in their work include Anne B. Chang, Richard S. Irwin, Susan L. Keays, Lorcan McGarvey, and Stuart B. Mazzone. These co-authors have contributed to multiple joint publications, indicating ongoing collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Classification of Cough as a Symptom in Adults and Management Algorithms: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

    Richard S. Irwin;Cynthia L. French;Anne B. Chang;Kenneth W. Altman

  • Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale

    Clifford J. Mallett;Masato Kawabata;Peter Newcombe;Andrés Otero-Forero

  • A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and Gracilis tendon graft.

    Susan L. Keays;Joanne E. Bullock-Saxton;Anthony C. Keays;Peter A. Newcombe

  • What Is the Burden of Chronic Cough for Families

    Julie M. Marchant;Peter A. Newcombe;Elizabeth F. Juniper;Jeannie K. Sheffield

  • Chronic Cough Due to Gastroesophageal Reflux in Adults: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

    Peter J. Kahrilas;Kenneth W. Altman;Anne B. Chang;Stephen K. Field

  • CICADA: Cough in Children and Adults: Diagnosis and Assessment. Australian cough guidelines summary statement.

    Peter G Gibson;Peter G Gibson;Anne B Chang;Anne B Chang;Nicholas J Glasgow;Peter W Holmes

  • Culture and Children's Cosmology.

    Michael Siegal;George Butterworth;Peter A. Newcombe

  • Attributions of Responsibility for Rape: Differences Across Familiarity of Situation, Gender and Acceptance of Rape Myths

    Peter A. Newcombe;Julie Van Den Eynde;Diane Hafner;Lesley Jolly

  • Theory of mind and central coherence in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome

    Renae Beaumont;Peter Newcombe

  • An integrated cognitive model of panic disorder: The role of positive and negative cognitions

    Leanne Michelle Casey;Tian P.S. Oei;Peter A. Newcombe

  • Working and caring for a child with chronic illness: A review of current literature

    Antonia Kish;Peter Newcombe;Divna Haslam

  • Somatic Cough Syndrome (Previously Referred to as Psychogenic Cough) and Tic Cough (Previously Referred to as Habit Cough) in Adults and Children: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

    Anne E. Vertigan;Mohammad H. Murad;Tamara Pringsheim;Anthony Feinstein

  • Dissociation in children's trauma narratives: an exploratory investigation.

    Justin A. Kenardy;Andrea Michelle Smith;Susan H. Spence;Peta-Rochelle Lilley

  • The Effect of Taping, Quadriceps Strengthening and Stretching Prescribed Separately or Combined on Patellofemoral Pain†‡

    Marjon Mason;Susan L. Keays;Peter A. Newcombe

  • The Role of Catastrophic Misinterpretation of Bodily Sensations and Panic Self-efficacy in predicting panic severity

    Leanne Michelle Casey;Tian P.S. Oei;Peter A. Newcombe;Justin Kenardy

  • The effectiveness of a pre-operative home-based physiotherapy programme for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

    SL Keays;JE Bullock-Saxton;P Newcombe;MI Bullock

  • Measuring Self-efficacy in Gambling: The Gambling Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

    Leanne Michelle Casey;Tian P S Oei;Katherine Maree Melville;Emilie Jane Bourke

  • Development of a parent-proxy quality-of-life chronic cough-specific questionnaire: clinical impact vs psychometric evaluations.

    Peter A. Newcombe;Jeanie K. Sheffield;Elizabeth F. Juniper;Julie M. Marchant

  • When Work and Family are in Conflict: Impact on Psychological Strain Experienced by Social Workers in Australia

    Parveen Kalliath;Mark Hughes;Peter Newcombe

  • Where to look first for suggestibility in young children

    Peter A. Newcombe;Michael Siegal

  • Enhancing Different Ethnicity Science Process Skills: Problem-Based Learning through Practicum and Authentic Assessment.

    Hilarius Jago Duda;Herawati Susilo;Peter Newcombe

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne B. Chang
Anne B. Chang Boston Children's Hospital
Jeanie Sheffield
Jeanie Sheffield University of Queensland
Peter G. Gibson
Peter G. Gibson University of Newcastle Australia
Christopher E. Brightling
Christopher E. Brightling University of Leicester
Susan M. Tarlo
Susan M. Tarlo University of Toronto
Louis-Philippe Boulet
Louis-Philippe Boulet Université Laval
Jay H. Ryu
Jay H. Ryu Mayo Clinic
Peter J. Kahrilas
Peter J. Kahrilas Northwestern University
Donald C. Bolser
Donald C. Bolser University of Florida
Stuart B. Mazzone
Stuart B. Mazzone University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and specialized career paths in the USA. Many students interested in mental health choose fields such as counseling, clinical psychology, or substance abuse counseling. Notably, there are important local and state-specific requirements to consider for these careers.

For example, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Honolulu requires meeting Hawaii’s unique licensure standards. By contrast, Houston substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for specialized training and certifications valid in Texas. Similarly, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Huntsville must understand Alabama’s pathway, which may include different academic and supervised experience milestones.

Individuals seeking roles in Indiana should be aware of substance abuse counselor requirements in Indianapolis, which emphasize accredited coursework and practical experience in the state. Exploring accredited online psychology degrees can help meet these prerequisites, offering flexibility for working professionals and new students alike. Researching regional requirements is key to building a successful and rewarding career in this expanding field.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Newcombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles