World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 38 10282 9994 36 36 177 5764

Marco Canini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Canini between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Canini published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 17 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
2006 2026

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Canini: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 10
2010 5
2011 13
2012 3
2013 11
2014 8
2015 8
2016 11
2017 20
2018 11
2019 10
2020 7
2021 20
2022 3
2023 11
2024 16
2025 15
2026 2
Total 188
Download as CSV

Marco Canini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Canini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 172–181 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 177 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556 177
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Canini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Canini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 38
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco Canini is affiliated with King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research primarily falls within the broader field of Computer Science, with focused contributions in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Information Systems. Additional areas of study include Computational Mechanics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist has authored numerous publications, including recent papers such as "P4xos: Consensus as a Network Service" (2020) published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, "A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Heterogeneity in Federated Learning" (2023) in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, and "An Efficient Statistical-based Gradient Compression Technique for Distributed Training Systems" (2021) on arXiv. Other papers include "Rethinking gradient sparsification as total error minimization" (2021) also on arXiv and "Do the best cloud configurations grow on trees?" (2020) in the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.

Research topics addressed by Marco Canini encompass:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem
  • Salma Kharrat
  • Peter Richtárik
  • Samuel Horváth
  • Chen-Yu Ho

Their work has appeared in various reputable publication venues, with notable frequency in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • A NICE way to test openflow applications

    Marco Canini;Daniele Venzano;Peter Perešíni;Dejan Kostić

  • Sonata: query-driven streaming network telemetry

    Arpit Gupta;Rob Harrison;Marco Canini;Nick Feamster

  • In-Network Computation is a Dumb Idea Whose Time Has Come

    Amedeo Sapio;Ibrahim Abdelaziz;Abdulla Aldilaijan;Marco Canini

  • FatTire: declarative fault tolerance for software-defined networks

    Mark Reitblatt;Marco Canini;Arjun Guha;Nate Foster

  • Efficient application identification and the temporal and spatial stability of classification schema

    Wei Li;Marco Canini;Andrew W. Moore;Raffaele Bolla

  • C3: cutting tail latency in cloud data stores via adaptive replica selection

    Lalith Suresh;Marco Canini;Stefan Schmid;Anja Feldmann

  • NetPaxos: consensus at network speed

    Huynh Tu Dang;Daniele Sciascia;Marco Canini;Fernando Pedone

  • Panopticon: reaping the benefits of incremental SDN deployment in enterprise networks

    Dan Levin;Marco Canini;Stefan Schmid;Fabian Schaffert

  • Scaling Distributed Machine Learning with In-Network Aggregation

    Amedeo Sapio;Marco Canini;Chen-Yu Ho;Jacob Nelson

  • A SOFT way for openflow switch interoperability testing

    Maciej Kuzniar;Peter Peresini;Marco Canini;Daniele Venzano

  • A distributed and robust SDN control plane for transactional network updates

    Marco Canini;Petr Kuznetsov;Dan Levin;Stefan Schmid

  • Paxos Made Switch-y

    Huynh Tu Dang;Marco Canini;Fernando Pedone;Robert Soulé

  • Identifying and using energy-critical paths

    Nedeljko Vasić;Prateek Bhurat;Dejan Novaković;Marco Canini

  • Scaling Distributed Machine Learning with In-Network Aggregation

    Amedeo Sapio;Marco Canini;Chen-Yu Ho;Jacob Nelson

  • Natural Compression for Distributed Deep Learning

    Samuel Horváth;Chen-Yu Ho;Ludovit Horváth;Atal Narayan Sahu

  • Efficient sparse collective communication and its application to accelerate distributed deep learning

    Jiawei Fei;Chen-Yu Ho;Atal N. Sahu;Marco Canini

  • Insomnia in the access: or how to curb access network related energy consumption

    Eduard Goma;Marco Canini;Alberto Lopez Toledo;Nikolaos Laoutaris

  • P4xos: Consensus as a Network Service

    Huynh Tu Dang;Pietro Bressana;Han Wang;Ki Suh Lee

  • Software transactional networking: concurrent and consistent policy composition

    Marco Canini;Petr Kuznetsov;Dan Levin;Stefan Schmid

  • An Industrial-Scale Software Defined Internet Exchange Point

    Arpit Gupta;Robert MacDavid;Rüdiger Birkner;Marco Canini

  • Incremental SDN deployment in enterprise networks

    Dan Levin;Marco Canini;Stefan Schmid;Anja Feldmann

  • LineFS: Efficient SmartNIC Offload of a Distributed File System with Pipeline Parallelism

    Jongyul Kim;Insu Jang;Waleed Reda;Jaeseong Im

Frequent Co-Authors

Dejan Kostic
Dejan Kostic Royal Institute of Technology
Stefan Schmid
Stefan Schmid Technical University of Berlin
Panos Kalnis
Panos Kalnis King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Anja Feldmann
Anja Feldmann Max Planck Society
Fernando Pedone
Fernando Pedone Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Nick Feamster
Nick Feamster University of Chicago
Arvind Krishnamurthy
Arvind Krishnamurthy University of Washington
Peter Richtárik
Peter Richtárik King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Walter Willinger
Walter Willinger NIKSUN, Inc.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t end with a four-year degree. Many students look into specialized online programs to expand their skill set or accelerate their careers. For those interested in the intersection of programming, statistics, and business, pursuing a data science degree is an affordable and high-demand pathway.

Another popular area is electrical engineering. Earning your credential from one of the top online electrical engineering schools can provide a versatile career, especially if you're interested in hardware, robotics, or systems design.

Not everyone has the time or resources for a lengthy program. In that case, you may want to consider easy certifications to get online. These quick credentials can improve your earning potential and help you enter new tech fields without years of schooling.

Finally, if you want to level up your qualifications as fast as possible, check out the quickest online masters degree options. These accelerated programs can be completed in as little as one year, helping you enter advanced roles sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Canini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles