World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
11704
World Ranking
5298
National Ranking
58

Olivier Bonaventure publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Bonaventure sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 317 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Olivier Bonaventure D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Bonaventure sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Bonaventure is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. The primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on Computer Networks and Communications among other subfields including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems.

Their research covers topics such as:

  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Olivier Bonaventure has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "Multiflow QUIC: A Generic Multipath Transport Protocol" (2021), published in IEEE Communications Magazine
  • "FlEC: Enhancing QUIC With Application-Tailored Reliability Mechanisms" (2022), published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • "Leveraging eBPF to Make TCP Path-Aware" (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • "The multiple roles that IPv6 addresses can play in today's internet" (2022), published in ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • "Beyond socket options: Towards fully extensible Linux transport stacks" (2020), published in Computer Communications

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Networking
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
  • IEEE Communications Magazine

Frequent co-authors include Quentin De Coninck, Marco Mellia, Louis Navarre, Peter Steenkiste, and Maxime Piraux, reflecting collaboration across multiple research efforts.

Best Publications

  • TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses

    Mark Handley;Olivier Bonaventure;Costin Raiciu;Alan Ford

  • How hard can it be? designing and implementing a deployable multipath TCP

    Costin Raiciu;Christoph Paasch;Sebastien Barre;Alan Ford

  • Achieving sub-second IGP convergence in large IP networks

    Pierre Francois;Clarence Filsfils;John Evans;Olivier Bonaventure

  • Exploring mobile/WiFi handover with multipath TCP

    Christoph Paasch;Gregory Detal;Fabien Duchene;Costin Raiciu

  • Experimental evaluation of multipath TCP schedulers

    Christoph Paasch;Simone Ferlin;Ozgu Alay;Olivier Bonaventure

  • Interdomain traffic engineering with BGP

    B. Quoitin;C. Pelsser;L. Swinnen;O. Bonaventure

  • Multipath QUIC: Design and Evaluation

    Quentin De Coninck;Olivier Bonaventure

  • MultiPath TCP: from theory to practice

    Sébastien Barré;Christoph Paasch;Olivier Bonaventure

  • Opportunities and research challenges of hybrid software defined networks

    Stefano Vissicchio;Laurent Vanbever;Olivier Bonaventure

  • Evaluating the benefits of the locator/identifier separation

    Bruno Quoitin;Luigi Iannone;Cédric de Launois;Olivier Bonaventure

  • Avoiding transient loops during the convergence of link-state routing protocols

    Pierre Francois;Olivier Bonaventure

  • A Declarative and Expressive Approach to Control Forwarding Paths in Carrier-Grade Networks

    Renaud Hartert;Stefano Vissicchio;Pierre Schaus;Olivier Bonaventure

  • IP micro-mobility protocols

    P. Reinbold;O. Bonaventure

  • Revealing middlebox interference with tracebox

    Gregory Detal;Benjamin Hesmans;Olivier Bonaventure;Yves Vanaubel

  • An efficient algorithm to enable path diversity in link state routing networks

    P. Mérindol;P. Francois;O. Bonaventure;S. Cateloin

  • Disruption Free Topology Reconfiguration in OSPF Networks

    P. Francois;M. Shand;O. Bonaventure

  • TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses : draft-ietf-mptcp-multiaddressed-03

    Alan Ford;Costin Raiciu;Mark Handley;Olivier Bonaventure

  • A first look at starlink performance

    Unknown

  • Achieving sub-50 milliseconds recovery upon BGP peering link failures

    Olivier Bonaventure;Clarence Filsfils;Pierre Francois

  • Open issues in interdomain routing: a survey

    M. Yannuzzi;X. Masip-Bruin;O. Bonaventure

  • Decoupled from IP, TCP is at last able to support multihomed hosts

    Christoph Paasch;Olivier Bonaventure

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Uhlig
Steve Uhlig Queen Mary University of London
Clarence Filsfils
Clarence Filsfils Cisco Systems (United States)
Mark Handley
Mark Handley University College London
Stefano Previdi
Stefano Previdi Huawei Technologies (Italy)
Konstantina Papagiannaki
Konstantina Papagiannaki Google (United States)
Jean-Jacques Quisquater
Jean-Jacques Quisquater Université Catholique de Louvain
Stewart Bryant
Stewart Bryant Futurewei Technologies
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Stefano Salsano
Stefano Salsano University of Rome Tor Vergata

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As demand for tech expertise grows, there are now more degrees you can get online that pay well, including many in Computer Science and related fields. Online programs offer greater accessibility and flexibility, allowing students of any background to upskill while balancing other commitments.

Specializations such as artificial intelligence (AI) are especially sought-after. If you’re interested in this booming sector, consider looking into ai online degrees to gain cutting-edge skills that are highly marketable worldwide. These programs often combine theory with hands-on projects, preparing graduates for roles in research, development, and industry.

If you’re unsure where to start, exploring the best program in college can help you align your studies with future job prospects. For those seeking advanced qualifications without an overwhelming workload, there are also easiest masters degrees available that offer strong returns on your investment.

Whether aiming for a fast-track degree, a specialized AI program, or a straightforward master’s, a variety of online computer science pathways now exist to fit diverse goals and learning styles.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Bonaventure

Trending Scientists