World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15552 14633 7837 7251 768 26771

Paul A. Gardner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul A. Gardner between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul A. Gardner published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 24.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 69 publications in 2023. 60 of the 940 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 69. Peak 69 publications in 2023. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 55 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 52 publications 2018: 46 publications 2019: 63 publications 2020: 63 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 63 publications 2023: 69 publications 2024: 62 publications 2025: 55 publications 2026: 5 publications
1988 2026

940 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul A. Gardner: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 10
2006 3
2007 37
2008 31
2009 42
2010 32
2011 32
2012 55
2013 35
2014 42
2015 41
2016 40
2017 52
2018 46
2019 63
2020 63
2021 59
2022 63
2023 69
2024 62
2025 55
2026 5
Total 940
Download as CSV

Paul A. Gardner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 768 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 768
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul A. Gardner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul A. Gardner is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with 834 publications contributing to this area. Subfields of their work focus notably on Surgery, Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Neurology.

The main research topics covered by their work include Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Meningioma and Schwannoma Management, Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments, Cerebrospinal Fluid and Hydrocephalus, Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments, Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, and Sinusitis and Nasal Conditions.

They have contributed significantly to various scientific journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
  • Neurosurgery
  • Operative Neurosurgery
  • Brain and Spine
  • World Neurosurgery

Among their recent papers are:

  • International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors, 2023, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • Nerve-specific extracellular matrix hydrogel promotes functional regeneration following nerve gap injury, 2021, npj Regenerative Medicine
  • Reconstruction after endoscopic surgery for skull base malignancies, 2020, Journal of Neuro-Oncology
  • Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas with Intraventricular Extension: Case Series, Long-Term Outcomes, and Review, 2020, World Neurosurgery
  • Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: Consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section, 2022, Brain and Spine

Paul A. Gardner has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Carl H. Snyderman
  • Eric W. Wang
  • Georgios A. Zenonos
  • Garret Choby
  • Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar

Best Publications

  • Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica

    Amin Kassam;Carl H Snyderman;Arlan Mintz;Paul Gardner

  • Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa.

    Amin B Kassam;Paul Gardner;Carl Snyderman;Arlan Mintz

  • Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap.

    Amin B Kassam;Ajith Thomas;Ricardo L Carrau;Carl H Snyderman

  • Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum.

    Amin Kassam;Carl H Snyderman;Arlan Mintz;Paul Gardner

  • Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients

    Amin B. Kassam;Daniel M. Prevedello;Ricardo L. Carrau;Carl H. Snyderman

  • The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report.

    Amin B Kassam;Carl Snyderman;Paul Gardner;Ricardo Carrau

  • Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum

    Amin B Kassam;Paul A Gardner;Carl H Snyderman;Ricardo L Carrau

  • Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas.

    Paul A Gardner;Amin B Kassam;Ajith Thomas;Carl H Snyderman

  • Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery.

    Adam M. Zanation;Ricardo L. Carrau;Carl H. Snyderman;Anand V. Germanwala

  • Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations

    Luigi M Cavallo;Andrea Messina;Paolo Cappabianca;Felice Esposito

  • Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches.

    Amin Kassam;Ricardo L Carrau;Carl H Snyderman;Paul Gardner

  • Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas : a case series

    Paul A Gardner;Amin B Kassam;Carl H Snyderman;Ricardo L Carrau

  • Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas.

    Martina Stippler;Paul A Gardner;Carl H Snyderman;Ricardo L Carrau

  • Endoscopic skull base surgery: Principles of endonasal oncological surgery

    Carl H. Snyderman;Ricardo L. Carrau;Amin B. Kassam;Adam Zanation

  • The posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap: a new vascularized flap for skull base reconstruction.

    Felipe S. G. Fortes;Ricardo L. Carrau;Carl H. Snyderman;Daniel Prevedello

  • Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery.

    Amin B Kassam;Allan D Vescan;Ricardo L Carrau;Daniel M Prevedello

  • Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches.

    Felipe S. G. Fortes;Ricardo L. Carrau;Carl H. Snyderman;Amin Kassam

  • Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: A new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction

    Adam M. Zanation;Carl H. Snyderman;Ricardo L. Carrau;Amin B. Kassam

  • How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations.

    Mihir R Patel;Michael E Stadler;Carl H Snyderman;Ricardo L Carrau

  • ENDOSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CRANIAL BASE USING A PEDICLED NASOSEPTAL FLAP. Commentaries

    Amin B. Kassam;Ajith Thomas;Ricardo L. Carrau;Carl H. Snyderman

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl H. Snyderman
Carl H. Snyderman University of Pittsburgh
Ricardo L. Carrau
Ricardo L. Carrau The Ohio State University
Amin B. Kassam
Amin B. Kassam Neeka Health
Paolo Cappabianca
Paolo Cappabianca University of Naples Federico II
Theodore H. Schwartz
Theodore H. Schwartz Cornell University
Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Albert L. Rhoton
Albert L. Rhoton University of Florida
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
L. Dade Lunsford
L. Dade Lunsford University of Pittsburgh
Ronald L. Hamilton
Ronald L. Hamilton University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering alternative routes into healthcare or seeking further specialization, online nursing degrees offer diverse career pathways. Many accredited U.S. universities now provide flexible programs that make it easier to balance study, work, and personal obligations.

If you're interested in advancing your nursing credentials while keeping costs manageable, you can explore the cheapest np programs online, which prepare you to become a nurse practitioner. For those with a non-nursing bachelor's degree aiming to become a registered nurse quickly, cheapest online accelerated bsn programs provide a fast-track option.

Nurses aiming for leadership, research, or education roles might consider pursuing advanced degrees affordably through the cheapest dnp programs online. Alternatively, registered nurses with an associate degree can seamlessly transition to a bachelor's degree with cheap rn to bsn programs.

These online degrees provide flexibility and affordability, supporting career growth in high-demand healthcare fields without putting your professional life on hold.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Gardner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles