World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
34609
World Ranking
7120
National Ranking
696

James Neuberger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Neuberger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 624 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James Neuberger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Neuberger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Neuberger is affiliated with Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses broadly on medicine, with a specialization in hepatology, surgery, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and transplantation. Throughout their career, they have contributed substantially to understanding liver disease and transplantation.

The primary topics of their work include organ transplantation techniques and outcomes, liver disease and transplantation, liver disease diagnosis and treatment, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, organ donation and transplantation, liver diseases and immunity, and gallbladder and bile duct disorders.

James Neuberger has coauthored research frequently with Palak Trivedi, Michael Murphy, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Marco Carbone, and Christopher J.E. Watson.

They have published extensively in several academic journals. The most frequent venues for their work are:

  • Liver Transplantation
  • Transplant International
  • Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Frontline Gastroenterology

Some of their recent notable papers include:

  • Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology (2020) published in Gut
  • The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system (2020) published in Anaesthesia
  • Adult liver transplantation: A UK clinical guideline - part 1: pre-operation (2020) published in Frontline Gastroenterology
  • Adult liver transplantation: UK clinical guideline - part 2: surgery and post-operation (2020) published in Frontline Gastroenterology
  • The Need for Alternatives to Liver Biopsies: Non-Invasive Analytics and Diagnostics (2021) published in Hepatic Medicine Evidence and Research

Best Publications

  • 2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

    A J Demetris;C Bellamy;S G Hübscher;J O'Leary

  • Long‐term management of the successful adult liver transplant: 2012 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation

    Michael R. Lucey;Norah Terrault;Lolu Ojo;J. Eileen Hay

  • Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice

    A Grant;J Neuberger

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 12 new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis

    George F Mells;James A B Floyd;Katherine I Morley;Katherine I Morley;Heather J Cordell

  • Comparison of the incidence of malignancy in recipients of different types of organ: a UK Registry audit.

    D. Collett;L. Mumford;N. R. Banner;N. R. Banner;J. Neuberger

  • Beneficial effect of azathioprine and prediction of prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Final results of an international trial

    Erik Christensen;James Neuberger;John Crowe;Douglas G. Altman

  • Sex and Age Are Determinants of the Clinical Phenotype of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

    Marco Carbone;George F. Mells;Greta Pells;Muhammad F. Dawwas

  • A Bioartificial Liver--State of the Art

    Alastair J. Strain;James M. Neuberger

  • Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease in Europe: A Study from the ELTR (European Liver Transplant Registry)

    P. Burra;M. Senzolo;R. Adam;V. Delvart

  • Presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a large prospective primary care cohort.

    Matthew J. Armstrong;Diarmaid D. Houlihan;Diarmaid D. Houlihan;Louise Bentham;Jean C. Shaw

  • Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries.

    Beatriz Domínguez-Gil;Bernadette Haase-Kromwijk;Hendrik Van Leiden;James Neuberger

  • Chronic renal failure following liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis.

    Neil C. Fisher;Peter G. Nightingale;Bridget K. Gunson;Graham W. Lipkin

  • New Classification of Donation after Circulatory Death Donors Definitions and Terminology

    Marie Thuong;Angel Ruiz;Patrick Evrard;Michael Kuiper

  • The UK-PBC risk scores: Derivation and validation of a scoring system for long-term prediction of end-stage liver disease in primary biliary cholangitis

    Marco Carbone;Stephen J. Sharp;Steve Flack;Dimitrios Paximadas

  • Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.

    Simon D Johnston;Joan K Morris;Rob Cramb;Bridget K Gunson

  • Antibodies to the surface of halothane-altered rabbit hepatocytes in patients with severe halothane-associated hepatitis.

    Diego Vergani;Giorgina Mieli-Vergani;Alfredo Alberti;James Neuberger

  • Primary biliary cirrhosis

    James M. Neuberger

  • International genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new primary biliary cirrhosis risk loci and targetable pathogenic pathways

    Heather J. Cordell;Younghun Han;George F. Mells;Yafang Li

  • Weight gain and obesity after liver transplantation.

    James Richards;Bridget Gunson;Jill Johnson;James Neuberger

  • Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): state of the art

    Dominic M. Summers;Dominic M. Summers;Christopher J.E. Watson;Gavin J. Pettigrew;Rachel J. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan G. Hubscher
Stefan G. Hubscher University of Birmingham
Elwyn Elias
Elwyn Elias University of Birmingham
Graeme J. M. Alexander
Graeme J. M. Alexander University College London
Roger Williams
Roger Williams Foundation for Liver Research
Gideon M. Hirschfield
Gideon M. Hirschfield University Health Network
David H. Adams
David H. Adams Mount Sinai Hospital
David Jones
David Jones Newcastle University
Darius F. Mirza
Darius F. Mirza University of Birmingham
Heather J. Cordell
Heather J. Cordell Newcastle University
Andrew K. Burroughs
Andrew K. Burroughs University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA opens doors to a wide range of specialized and administrative roles in healthcare. Many students consider online degrees to increase flexibility and access top programs nationwide. For those interested in leadership, an advanced degree in healthcare administration is a popular route. Learn more about masters in healthcare administration cost and discover affordable options.

If your passion is advanced nursing practice, pursuing one of the best dnp programs online can help you become a clinical leader or educator. Aspiring pharmacists can advance their qualifications by enrolling in online pharm d programs, combining flexibility with top-tier instruction.

Technology-driven students might pursue health information management, a growing field bridging patient care and data analytics. Explore earning a health information management bachelor degree online to expand your career options in healthcare IT, compliance, and administration. These degrees create diverse career pathways supporting the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing James Neuberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles