World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 154 991 103 1753 111906

Roger Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roger Williams between 1960 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roger Williams published across 67 years, from 1960 to 2026, averaging 26.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 77 publications in 1991. 2 of the 1,768 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 77. Peak 77 publications in 1991. 1960: 4 publications 1961: 4 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 5 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 3 publications 1967: 5 publications 1968: 7 publications 1969: 16 publications 1970: 28 publications 1971: 16 publications 1972: 26 publications 1973: 35 publications 1974: 35 publications 1975: 41 publications 1976: 52 publications 1977: 53 publications 1978: 52 publications 1979: 38 publications 1980: 48 publications 1981: 46 publications 1982: 38 publications 1983: 47 publications 1984: 61 publications 1985: 72 publications 1986: 62 publications 1987: 49 publications 1988: 55 publications 1989: 50 publications 1990: 65 publications 1991: 77 publications 1992: 52 publications 1993: 50 publications 1994: 66 publications 1995: 71 publications 1996: 51 publications 1997: 29 publications 1998: 48 publications 1999: 23 publications 2000: 27 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 39 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1960 2026

1,768 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roger Williams: publications per year, 1960 to 2026
Year Publications
1960 4
1961 4
1962 2
1963 0
1964 5
1965 2
1966 3
1967 5
1968 7
1969 16
1970 28
1971 16
1972 26
1973 35
1974 35
1975 41
1976 52
1977 53
1978 52
1979 38
1980 48
1981 46
1982 38
1983 47
1984 61
1985 72
1986 62
1987 49
1988 55
1989 50
1990 65
1991 77
1992 52
1993 50
1994 66
1995 71
1996 51
1997 29
1998 48
1999 23
2000 27
2001 23
2002 14
2003 39
2004 12
2005 26
2006 8
2007 10
2008 18
2009 2
2010 11
2011 5
2012 11
2013 11
2014 10
2015 13
2016 9
2017 9
2018 5
2019 13
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
2026 1
Total 1,768
Download as CSV

Roger Williams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,741–1,760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,753 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14 1,753
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Roger Williams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 154–155 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 154 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87 154
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Roger Williams was a researcher affiliated with the Foundation for Liver Research in the United Kingdom. Their scientific work covered multiple fields within medicine and biological sciences, with a focus on the study and treatment of liver disease, as well as research into cancer and bacterial infections.

The main fields of study in which Williams published included Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their subfields spanned Endocrinology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Oncology, and Neurology.

The topics they frequently investigated encompassed:

  • Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
  • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Williams contributed to a number of scientific papers between 2020 and 2025 published in peer-reviewed journals. Some recent publications include:

  • "Acanthamoebae as a protective reservoir for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a clinical environment," 2024, Journal of Hospital Infection
  • "Identification of soluble immune checkpoint receptor landscape in liver metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms: A new perspective for immunotherapy," 2020, Endocrine Abstracts
  • "P2.04A.06 A Multilevel Approach to Address Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: The PREP Trial," 2024, Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • "P1.04.10 Lung Cancer Screening Completion Rates as Predicted by Social Deprivation," 2025, Journal of Thoracic Oncology

The journals where Williams most frequently published include the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Journal of Hospital Infection, and Endocrine Abstracts.

Throughout their career, Williams collaborated often with coauthors such as K.L. Taylor, G. Luta, Anu Sangraula, Scott Melvin, and Robert A. Mooney.

Williams's research spanned clinical and molecular investigations related to infectious diseases, immune checkpoint mechanisms in liver metastases, and disparities in lung cancer screening. Their multidisciplinary approach bridged clinical medicine and molecular biology in studying complex disease pathways.

Best Publications

  • Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices

    R. N. H. Pugh;I. M. Murray‐Lyon;J. L. Dawson;M. C. Pietroni

  • Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure

    John G. O'Grady;Graeme J.M. Alexander;Karen M. Hayllar;Roger Williams

  • Acute liver failure: redefining the syndromes

    J G O'Grady;S W Schalm;R Williams

  • Long-Term Outcome of Hepatitis C Infection after Liver Transplantation

    Edward J. Gane;Bernard C. Portmann;Nikolai V. Naoumov;Heather M. Smith

  • Global challenges in liver disease

    Roger Williams

  • Addressing liver disease in the UK: A blueprint for attaining excellence in health care and reducing premature mortality from lifestyle issues of excess consumption of alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis

    Roger Williams;Richard Aspinall;Mark Bellis;Ginette Camps-Walsh

  • Controlled trials of charcoal hemoperfusion and prognostic factors in fulminant hepatic failure.

    John G. O'Grady;A.E.S. Gimson;C.J. O'Brien;A. Pucknell

  • Hepatic histological findings after transplantation for chronic hepatitis B virus infection, including a unique pattern of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis.

    S. E. Davies;B. C. Portmann;J. G. O'grady;P. M. Aldis

  • Hepatitis C virus antibodies in chronic active hepatitis: pathogenetic factor or false-positive result?

    I. G. McFarlane;H. M. Smith;P. J. Johnson;G. P. Bray

  • CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PREDNISONE AND AZATHIOPRINE IN ACTIVE CHRONIC HEPATITIS

    IainM Murray-Lyon;R.B Stern;Roger Williams

  • Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London.

    I T Gilmore;A Burroughs;I M Murray-Lyon;R Williams

  • Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy

    Stephen M. Riordan;Roger Williams

  • INFLUENCE OF DELTA INFECTION ON SEVERITY OF HEPATITIS B

    Antonina Smedile;Giorgio Verme;Antonietta Cargnel;Pietro Dentico

  • FIP/AAPS guidelines to dissolution/in vitro release testing of novel/special dosage forms

    Martin Siewert;Jennifer Dressman;Cynthia K. Brown;Vinod P. Shah

  • Natural history and prognostic variables in primary sclerosing cholangitis

    J.Mark Farrant;Karen M. Hayllar;Mark L. Wilkinson;John Karani

  • Specificity of T lymphocyte cytotoxicity to autologous hepatocytes in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Evidence that T cells are directed against HBV core antigen expressed on hepatocytes

    M Mondelli;G M Vergani;A Alberti;D Vergani

  • Liver transplantation for malignant disease. Results in 93 consecutive patients.

    J G O'Grady;R J Polson;K Rolles;R Y Calne

  • A longitudinal analysis of hepatitis C virus replication following liver transplantation

    E. J. Gane;N. V. Naoumov;K.-P. Qian;M. U. Mondelli

  • Direct ex vivo analysis of hepatitis B virus-specific CD8+ T cells associated with the control of infection

    Mala K. Maini;Carolina Boni;Graham S. Ogg;Abigail S. King

  • Beneficial effect of azathioprine and prediction of prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Final results of an international trial

    Erik Christensen;James Neuberger;John Crowe;Douglas G. Altman

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Portmann
Bernard Portmann King's College London
Nikolai V. Naoumov
Nikolai V. Naoumov Novartis (Switzerland)
A. L. W. F. Eddleston
A. L. W. F. Eddleston University of Cambridge
Graeme J. M. Alexander
Graeme J. M. Alexander University College London
Rajiv Jalan
Rajiv Jalan University College London
John O'Grady
John O'Grady King's College London
Julia Wendon
Julia Wendon King's College London
Diego Vergani
Diego Vergani King's College London
Nigel Heaton
Nigel Heaton King's College London
Peter T. Donaldson
Peter T. Donaldson University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare that offer both flexibility and affordability. These programs are ideal for those looking to advance their careers while balancing existing work or family commitments.

Pursuing one of the most affordable mha programs can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations. If your interest lies in advanced clinical practice, exploring cheap online dnp programs may offer the flexibility and cost-effectiveness you need as you grow your expertise.

Pharmacy is another vital field, with online pharmd programs providing a pathway to becoming a licensed pharmacist. Additionally, informatics is a rapidly expanding area in healthcare; earning your degree from an online mhi program can open opportunities in data management, policy, and IT within medical settings.

These online programs offer diverse options for advancing your healthcare career—often at a lower cost and with greater flexibility than traditional, on-campus routes.

Best Scientists Citing Roger Williams

Recently Published Articles