World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert J. Herfkens

Robert J. Herfkens

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
18375
World Ranking
18895
National Ranking
9415

Robert J. Herfkens publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Herfkens sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 247 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert J. Herfkens D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Herfkens sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Herfkens is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic profile includes a focus on research within the university environment, though specific fields of study, publication topics, and collaborations are not detailed in the available data.

There are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues listed for this scientist. Additionally, no book publications or awards have been documented in the accessible information.

Details regarding the main or subfields of study, as well as specific research topics, are not provided. Consequently, an overview of particular scientific interests or thematic concentrations cannot be drawn from the existing data.

No information about the scientist's status indicates that they are currently active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging.

    N J Pelc;R J Herfkens;A Shimakawa;D R Enzmann

  • MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility.

    Stephen J. Riederer;Talin Tasciyan;Farhad Farzaneh;James N. Lee

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Dogs: Alterations in Magnetic Relaxation Times

    Charles B. Higgins;Robert Herfkens;Martin J. Lipton;Richard Sievers

  • Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging.

    Evan K. Fram;Robert J. Herfkens;G.Allan Johnson;Gary H. Glover

  • MRI of brain iron

    B. Drayer;P. Burger;R. Darwin;S. Riederer

  • CT-determined pulmonary artery diameters in predicting pulmonary hypertension.

    Keiko Kuriyama;Gordon Gamsu;Robert G. Stern;Christopher E. Cann

  • Quantification of Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms During Rest and Exercise Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Andrea S. Les;Shawn C. Shadden;C. Alberto Figueroa;Jinha M. Park

  • Parkinson plus syndrome: diagnosis using high field MR imaging of brain iron.

    B P Drayer;W Olanow;P Burger;G A Johnson

  • The aortopathy of bicuspid aortic valve disease has distinctive patterns and usually involves the transverse aortic arch.

    Shafie S. Fazel;Hari R. Mallidi;Richard S. Lee;Michael P. Sheehan

  • Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping

    Thomas A. Hope;Michael Markl;Lars Wigström;Lars Wigström;Marcus T. Alley

  • Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging

    B L Daniel;Y F Yen;G H Glover;D M Ikeda

  • Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients.

    Michael Markl;Mary T Draney;Michael D Hope;Jonathan M Levin

  • Cardiac Imaging Using Gated Magnetic Resonance

    P Lanzer;E H Botvinick;N B Schiller;L E Crooks

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiovascular system: Normal and pathologic findings

    Robert J. Herfkens;Charles B. Higgins;Hedvig Hricak;Martin J. Lipton

  • Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging.

    L R Pelc;N J Pelc;S C Rayhill;L J Castro

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Iron

    Burton Drayer;Peter Burger;Robert Darwin;Stephen Riederer

  • Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.

    W. S. Whitney;R. J. Herfkens;R. B. Jeffrey;C. H. Mcdonnell

  • In vivo quantification of blood flow and wall shear stress in the human abdominal aorta during lower limb exercise.

    Charles A. Taylor;Christopher P. Cheng;Leandro A. Espinosa;Beverly T. Tang

  • Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding.

    J F Debatin;R H Ting;H Wegmüller;F G Sommer

  • MR Spectroscopic imaging of collagen: Tendons and knee menisci

    Garry E. Gold;John M. Pauly;Albert Macovski;Robert J. Herfkens

Frequent Co-Authors

Norbert J. Pelc
Norbert J. Pelc Stanford University
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Ronald L. Dalman
Ronald L. Dalman Stanford University
Charles B. Higgins
Charles B. Higgins University of California, San Francisco
Michael Markl
Michael Markl Northwestern University
Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
G. Allan Johnson
G. Allan Johnson Duke University
Sandy Napel
Sandy Napel Stanford University
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career but want more flexibility or a non-traditional route, online healthcare degrees offer excellent alternatives. Several affordable and accredited pathways can help you start or advance your career in medicine and related fields without the commitment of a full medical school program.

For those interested in administrative roles, affordable medical billing and coding programs provide training to work with medical records and insurance systems—a vital sector in healthcare today. If you aspire to deliver direct patient care, there are affordable np programs that prepare you to become a nurse practitioner, often in as little as two to three years.

Nursing remains in high demand, and cheapest online accelerated bsn programs help those with a previous degree quickly join the field. For nurses aiming for leadership or research roles, online phd in nursing online programs allow you to pursue doctoral degrees while balancing work and other commitments.

These online paths offer flexibility, affordability, and a variety of roles within healthcare, making a rewarding medical career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Herfkens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles