World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
30402
World Ranking
9006
National Ranking
4636

Graeme M. Bydder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Bydder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 412 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Graeme M. Bydder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Bydder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine, Robarts Research Institute
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Graeme M. Bydder is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical imaging, particularly focusing on advanced MRI techniques. Their research outputs primarily encompass the intersection of radiology, neurology, and biomedical engineering, with a specialized emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging applications.

The main fields of study for Bydder include Medicine, with significant contributions particularly in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Specific research topics frequently addressed are:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis

Bydder has published research in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • Preprints.org
  • Radiology
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Bydder illustrate their focus on MRI advancements and clinical applications:

  • Myelin Imaging in Human Brain Using a Short Repetition Time Adiabatic Inversion Recovery Prepared Ultrashort Echo Time (STAIR-UTE) MRI Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis, 2020, Radiology
  • Making the invisible visible-ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging: Technical developments and applications, 2022, Applied Physics Reviews
  • High-Resolution MRI of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: Gross Anatomy and Injury Characterization, 2020, Radiographics
  • Ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of myelin: technical developments and challenges, 2020, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • MRI chemical shift artifact produced by center-out radial sampling of k-space: a potential pitfall in clinical diagnosis, 2021, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research efforts are:

  • Paul Condron
  • Samantha Holdsworth
  • Daniel Cornfeld
  • Yajun Ma
  • Mark Bydder

Bydder has been recognized within the medical research community with awards such as the J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine from the Robarts Research Institute in 1998 and is a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load

    M. Benjamin;H. Toumi;J. R. Ralphs;G. Bydder

  • Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging.

    Matthew D. Robson;Peter D. Gatehouse;Mark Bydder;Graeme M. Bydder

  • The peripheral benzodiazepine binding site in the brain in multiple sclerosis: quantitative in vivo imaging of microglia as a measure of disease activity.

    R. B. Banati;J. Newcombe;R. N. Gunn;A. Cagnin

  • Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases

    G.M. Bydder;R.E. Steiner;I.R. Young;A.S. Hall

  • MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence.

    G M Bydder;I R Young

  • Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy

    Frances Cowan;Mary Rutherford;Floris Groenendaal;Paula Eken

  • NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE BRAIN IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

    I. R. Young;A. S. Hall;C. A. Pallis;G. M. Bydder

  • Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain

    Joseph V. Hajnal;Ralph Myers;Angela Oatridge;Jane E. Schwieso

  • MR of the brain using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences.

    B De Coene;J V Hajnal;P Gatehouse;D B Longmore

  • Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences in MRI of the brain

    Joseph V. Hajnal;David J. Bryant;Larry Kasuboski;Pradip M. Pattany

  • Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MRI : Initial clinical experience in 20 patients

    D H Carr;J Brown;G M Bydder;R E Steiner

  • Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging.

    D R Bailes;D J Gilderdale;G M Bydder;A G Collins

  • A registration and interpolation procedure for subvoxel matching of serially acquired MR images.

    Joseph V. Hajnal;Nadeem Saeed;Elaine J. Soar;Angela Oatridge

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Short T2 Components in Tissue

    P.D. Gatehouse;G.M. Bydder

  • The functional anatomy of the iliotibial band during flexion and extension of the knee: implications for understanding iliotibial band syndrome.

    John Fairclough;Koji Hayashi;Hechmi Toumi;Kathleen Lyons

  • Intravenous chelated gadolinium as a contrast agent in NMR imaging of cerebral tumours

    D H Carr;J Brown;G M Bydder;H J Weinmann

  • MR imaging of anisotropically restricted diffusion of water in the nervous system: technical, anatomic, and pathologic considerations.

    J. V. Hajnal;M. Doran;A. S. Hall;A. G. Collins

  • Early Prognostic Indicators of Outcome in Infants With Neonatal Cerebral Infarction: A Clinical, Electroencephalogram, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Eugenio Mercuri;Mary Rutherford;Frances Cowan;Jackie Pennock

  • Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph.

    Young Ir;Bailes Dr;Burl M;Collins Ag

  • Brain swelling in first hour after coronary artery bypass surgery.

    D. N. F. Harris;S. M. Bailey;P. L. C. Smith;K. M. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph V. Hajnal
Joseph V. Hajnal King's College London
Serena J. Counsell
Serena J. Counsell King's College London
Mary A. Rutherford
Mary A. Rutherford King's College London
Eugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Matthew D. Robson
Matthew D. Robson University of Oxford
Francesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni University College London
Jody Corey-Bloom
Jody Corey-Bloom University of California, San Diego
Caroline Sewry
Caroline Sewry Great Ormond Street Hospital
Heinz Jungbluth
Heinz Jungbluth King's College London
Victor Dubowitz
Victor Dubowitz Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to various healthcare careers and flexible educational routes. Students often consider alternative programs that offer career mobility and specialized skills—all with the convenience of online study.

For those looking to advance from licensed practical nurse to registered nurse, lpn to rn programs without teas test can streamline the journey, removing common exam barriers. If you’re already a registered nurse and aiming to become a nurse practitioner, specialized asn to nurse practitioner programs provide accelerated bridge options entirely online.

Beyond nursing, demand for leaders in healthcare is on the rise. online health administration programs deliver business, management, and policy expertise tailored for the modern healthcare environment. Additionally, those interested in health promotion or dietetics can pursue an online degree nutrition to build a foundation in nutrition science.

Choosing the right path depends on your background, career goals, and desired pace of study. These flexible online programs can help you advance your education while accommodating your professional life.

Best Scientists Citing Graeme M. Bydder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles