World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 9005 8452 4635 4287 412 30402

Graeme M. Bydder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graeme M. Bydder between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graeme M. Bydder published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 1985. 22 of the 469 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 1985. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 17 publications 1984: 22 publications 1985: 24 publications 1986: 15 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 18 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

469 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graeme M. Bydder: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 11
1981 9
1982 14
1983 17
1984 22
1985 24
1986 15
1987 12
1988 18
1989 14
1990 10
1991 7
1992 6
1993 7
1994 7
1995 13
1996 9
1997 5
1998 4
1999 6
2000 6
2001 16
2002 13
2003 8
2004 12
2005 8
2006 10
2007 8
2008 9
2009 5
2010 12
2011 8
2012 7
2013 11
2014 9
2015 4
2016 6
2017 4
2018 2
2019 4
2020 8
2021 5
2022 4
2023 15
2024 21
2025 21
2026 1
Total 469
Download as CSV

Graeme M. Bydder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Bydder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 412 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 412
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Graeme M. Bydder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graeme M. Bydder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine, Robarts Research Institute
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Graeme M. Bydder is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical imaging, particularly focusing on advanced MRI techniques. Their research outputs primarily encompass the intersection of radiology, neurology, and biomedical engineering, with a specialized emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging applications.

The main fields of study for Bydder include Medicine, with significant contributions particularly in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Specific research topics frequently addressed are:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis

Bydder has published research in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • Preprints.org
  • Radiology
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Bydder illustrate their focus on MRI advancements and clinical applications:

  • Myelin Imaging in Human Brain Using a Short Repetition Time Adiabatic Inversion Recovery Prepared Ultrashort Echo Time (STAIR-UTE) MRI Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis, 2020, Radiology
  • Making the invisible visible-ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging: Technical developments and applications, 2022, Applied Physics Reviews
  • High-Resolution MRI of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint: Gross Anatomy and Injury Characterization, 2020, Radiographics
  • Ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of myelin: technical developments and challenges, 2020, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • MRI chemical shift artifact produced by center-out radial sampling of k-space: a potential pitfall in clinical diagnosis, 2021, Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research efforts are:

  • Paul Condron
  • Samantha Holdsworth
  • Daniel Cornfeld
  • Yajun Ma
  • Mark Bydder

Bydder has been recognized within the medical research community with awards such as the J. Allyn Taylor International Prize in Medicine from the Robarts Research Institute in 1998 and is a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load

    M. Benjamin;H. Toumi;J. R. Ralphs;G. Bydder

  • Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging.

    Matthew D. Robson;Peter D. Gatehouse;Mark Bydder;Graeme M. Bydder

  • The peripheral benzodiazepine binding site in the brain in multiple sclerosis: quantitative in vivo imaging of microglia as a measure of disease activity.

    R. B. Banati;J. Newcombe;R. N. Gunn;A. Cagnin

  • Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases

    G.M. Bydder;R.E. Steiner;I.R. Young;A.S. Hall

  • MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence.

    G M Bydder;I R Young

  • Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy

    Frances Cowan;Mary Rutherford;Floris Groenendaal;Paula Eken

  • NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE BRAIN IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

    I. R. Young;A. S. Hall;C. A. Pallis;G. M. Bydder

  • Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain

    Joseph V. Hajnal;Ralph Myers;Angela Oatridge;Jane E. Schwieso

  • MR of the brain using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences.

    B De Coene;J V Hajnal;P Gatehouse;D B Longmore

  • Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences in MRI of the brain

    Joseph V. Hajnal;David J. Bryant;Larry Kasuboski;Pradip M. Pattany

  • Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MRI : Initial clinical experience in 20 patients

    D H Carr;J Brown;G M Bydder;R E Steiner

  • Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging.

    D R Bailes;D J Gilderdale;G M Bydder;A G Collins

  • A registration and interpolation procedure for subvoxel matching of serially acquired MR images.

    Joseph V. Hajnal;Nadeem Saeed;Elaine J. Soar;Angela Oatridge

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Short T2 Components in Tissue

    P.D. Gatehouse;G.M. Bydder

  • The functional anatomy of the iliotibial band during flexion and extension of the knee: implications for understanding iliotibial band syndrome.

    John Fairclough;Koji Hayashi;Hechmi Toumi;Kathleen Lyons

  • Intravenous chelated gadolinium as a contrast agent in NMR imaging of cerebral tumours

    D H Carr;J Brown;G M Bydder;H J Weinmann

  • MR imaging of anisotropically restricted diffusion of water in the nervous system: technical, anatomic, and pathologic considerations.

    J. V. Hajnal;M. Doran;A. S. Hall;A. G. Collins

  • Early Prognostic Indicators of Outcome in Infants With Neonatal Cerebral Infarction: A Clinical, Electroencephalogram, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Eugenio Mercuri;Mary Rutherford;Frances Cowan;Jackie Pennock

  • Initial clinical evaluation of a whole body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomograph.

    Young Ir;Bailes Dr;Burl M;Collins Ag

  • Brain swelling in first hour after coronary artery bypass surgery.

    D. N. F. Harris;S. M. Bailey;P. L. C. Smith;K. M. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph V. Hajnal
Joseph V. Hajnal King's College London
Serena J. Counsell
Serena J. Counsell King's College London
Mary A. Rutherford
Mary A. Rutherford King's College London
Eugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Matthew D. Robson
Matthew D. Robson University of Oxford
Francesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni University College London
Jody Corey-Bloom
Jody Corey-Bloom University of California, San Diego
Caroline Sewry
Caroline Sewry Great Ormond Street Hospital
Heinz Jungbluth
Heinz Jungbluth King's College London
Victor Dubowitz
Victor Dubowitz Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to various healthcare careers and flexible educational routes. Students often consider alternative programs that offer career mobility and specialized skills—all with the convenience of online study.

For those looking to advance from licensed practical nurse to registered nurse, lpn to rn programs without teas test can streamline the journey, removing common exam barriers. If you’re already a registered nurse and aiming to become a nurse practitioner, specialized asn to nurse practitioner programs provide accelerated bridge options entirely online.

Beyond nursing, demand for leaders in healthcare is on the rise. online health administration programs deliver business, management, and policy expertise tailored for the modern healthcare environment. Additionally, those interested in health promotion or dietetics can pursue an online degree nutrition to build a foundation in nutrition science.

Choosing the right path depends on your background, career goals, and desired pace of study. These flexible online programs can help you advance your education while accommodating your professional life.

Best Scientists Citing Graeme M. Bydder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles