World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
14986
World Ranking
2900
National Ranking
1344

Jody Corey-Bloom publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jody Corey-Bloom sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 220 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jody Corey-Bloom D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jody Corey-Bloom sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jody Corey-Bloom is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The main topics of their work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders.

Corey-Bloom has published extensively in several venues, including:

  • Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • Neurology
  • Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
  • Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Frequent coauthors include Chase Snell, Paul E. Gilbert, Georgia M. Parkin, Hyungseok Jang, and Andrew Hall, each contributing to multiple collaborative works.

Selected recent publications illustrate the diversity and focus of Corey-Bloom's research:

  • Myelin Imaging in Human Brain Using a Short Repetition Time Adiabatic Inversion Recovery Prepared Ultrashort Echo Time (STAIR-UTE) MRI Sequence in Multiple Sclerosis (2020), published in Radiology
  • Safety and efficacy of valbenazine for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington's disease (KINECT-HD): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2023), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • Evaluation of Biochemical and Epigenetic Measures of Peripheral Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) as a Biomarker in Huntington's Disease Patients (2020), published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pepinemab antibody blockade of SEMA4D in early Huntington's disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial (2022), published in Nature Medicine
  • Ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of myelin: technical developments and challenges (2020), published in Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Best Publications

  • Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.

    Amy J. Jak;Amy J. Jak;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina Wierenga;Christina Wierenga

  • The importance of neuritic plaques and tangles to the development and evolution of AD.

    P. Tiraboschi;L. A. Hansen;L. J. Thal;Jody Corey-Bloom

  • Appendix B: Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American academy neurology

    D. S. Knopman;S. T. DeKosky;J. L. Cummings;H. Chui

  • Cholinergic dysfunction in diseases with Lewy bodies.

    P. Tiraboschi;L. A. Hansen;M. Alford;M. N. Sabbagh

  • Cognitive effects of treating obstructive sleep apnea in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled study.

    Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Barton W. Palmer;Jana R. Cooke;Jody Corey-Bloom

  • Increased light exposure consolidates sleep and strengthens circadian rhythms in severe Alzheimer's disease patients.

    Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Philip Gehrman;Jennifer L. Martin;Tamar Shochat

  • Influence of Alzheimer pathology on clinical diagnostic accuracy in dementia with Lewy bodies

    A. R. Merdes;L. A. Hansen;D. V. Jeste;D. Galasko

  • What best differentiates Lewy body from Alzheimer's disease in early-stage dementia?

    Pietro Tiraboschi;David P. Salmon;Lawrence A. Hansen;Richard C. Hofstetter

  • Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease.

    P. Tiraboschi;L. A. Hansen;E. Masliah;M. Alford

  • Low body weight in Alzheimer's disease is associated with mesial temporal cortex atrophy

    M. Grundman;J. Corey-Bloom;T. Jernigan;S. Archibald

  • Sustained Use of CPAP Slows Deterioration of Cognition, Sleep, and Mood in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Preliminary Study

    Jana R. Cooke;Liat Ayalon;Barton W. Palmer;Jose S. Loredo

  • Alzheimer's disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality.

    John Polich;Jody Corey-Bloom

  • Behavioural abnormalities contribute to functional decline in Huntington’s disease

    J M Hamilton;D P Salmon;J Corey-Bloom;A Gamst

  • Melatonin Fails to Improve Sleep or Agitation in Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Institutionalized Patients With Alzheimer Disease

    Philip R. Gehrman;Donald J. Connor;Jennifer L. Martin;Tamar Shochat

  • Early and Widespread Cholinergic Losses Differentiate Dementia With Lewy Bodies From Alzheimer Disease

    Pietro Tiraboschi;Larry A. Hansen;Michael Alford;Annette Merdes

  • In vivo evidence of cerebellar atrophy and cerebral white matter loss in Huntington disease

    C. Fennema-Notestine;S. L. Archibald;M. W. Jacobson;J. Corey-Bloom

  • Diagnosis and evaluation of dementia

    Jody Corey-Bloom;Leon J. Thal;Douglas R. Galasko;Marshall F. Folstein

  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Reduces Subjective Daytime Sleepiness in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease with Sleep Disordered Breathing

    Mei S. Chong;Liat Ayalon;Matthew Marler;Jose S. Loredo

  • Predictors of nursing home placement in Huntington disease

    Vicki L. Wheelock;T. Tempkin;Karen Marder;Martha Nance;Martha Nance

  • Diagnostic accuracy of dementia with Lewy bodies.

    Ursula Hohl;Pietro Tiraboschi;Lawrence A. Hansen;Leon J. Thal

  • Verbal paired-associate learning by APOE genotype in non-demented older adults: fMRI evidence of a right hemispheric compensatory response

    S. Duke Han;Wes S. Houston;Amy J. Jak;Lisa T. Eyler;Lisa T. Eyler

  • Effect of Light on Agitation in Institutionalized Patients With Severe Alzheimer Disease

    Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Jennifer L. Martin;Philip Gehrman;Tamar Shochat

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Gilbert
Paul E. Gilbert San Diego State University
Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Sonia Ancoli-Israel University of California, San Diego
Mark W. Bondi
Mark W. Bondi University of California, San Diego
Leon J. Thal
Leon J. Thal University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Lisa Delano-Wood
Lisa Delano-Wood University of California, San Diego
Dean C. Delis
Dean C. Delis University of California, San Diego
Barton W. Palmer
Barton W. Palmer University of California, San Diego
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Elizabeth A. Thomas
Elizabeth A. Thomas University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience online offers flexibility, but students should consider a few important factors. For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated online programs let you earn your degree faster without sacrificing quality.

If future earnings are a top concern, exploring the highest paying degrees and finding interesting majors that pay well can help you identify career paths related to neuroscience that maximize your potential salary.

Affordability is another key issue. Attending one of the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa can dramatically reduce student debt while making quality education accessible.

Whether you are aiming for a specialized neuroscience role or a broader healthcare or STEM field, exploring these online pathways can help you align your studies with your professional and financial goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jody Corey-Bloom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles