World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8517 7870 465 447 94 6728

Daniela Puzzo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniela Puzzo between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniela Puzzo published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 5 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniela Puzzo: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 7
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 3
2014 7
2015 7
2016 7
2017 9
2018 6
2019 8
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 4
2024 4
2025 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Daniela Puzzo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Puzzo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 94
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniela Puzzo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Puzzo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniela Puzzo is affiliated with the University of Catania in Italy. Their research focuses broadly on medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work further specializes in subfields such as physiology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, pharmacology, and behavioral neuroscience.

The main topics covered in Daniela Puzzo's research include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, cholinesterase and neurodegenerative diseases, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study, receptor mechanisms and signaling, stress responses and cortisol, and tryptophan and brain disorders.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniela Puzzo are:

  • Walter Gulisano
  • Maria Rosaria Tropea
  • Claudio Grassi
  • Ottavio Arancio
  • Fiorenzo Conti

The scientist has published in various academic venues. Most frequent among them are:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Stress
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology

Selected recent publications by Daniela Puzzo include:

  • "Tau is not necessary for amyloid-β-induced synaptic and memory impairments" (2020), Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "A novel arousal-based individual screening reveals susceptibility and resilience to PTSD-like phenotypes in mice" (2020), Neurobiology of Stress
  • "Antioxidant Activity of Fluoxetine and Vortioxetine in a Non-Transgenic Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease" (2021), Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • "Nitric oxide/cGMP/CREB pathway and amyloid-beta crosstalk: From physiology to Alzheimer's disease" (2022), Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • "Genetic deletion of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors induces an age-dependent Alzheimer's disease-like pathology" (2021), Progress in Neurobiology

Daniela Puzzo's body of work integrates molecular approaches and neuropharmacological perspectives, addressing mechanisms behind neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer's disease. Their exploration of receptor systems like nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and signaling pathways reflects a focus on both physiological and pathological processes.

Best Publications

  • Picomolar amyloid-beta positively modulates synaptic plasticity and memory in hippocampus.

    Daniela Puzzo;Lucia Privitera;Elena Leznik;Mauro Fà

  • RAGE potentiates Aβ-induced perturbation of neuronal function in transgenic mice

    Ottavio Arancio;Hui Ping Zhang;Xi Chen;Chang Lin

  • Endogenous amyloid-β is necessary for hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory.

    Daniela Puzzo;Lucia Privitera;Lucia Privitera;Mauro Fa;Agnieszka Staniszewski

  • Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibition Improves Synaptic Function, Memory, and Amyloid-β Load in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model

    Daniela Puzzo;Agnieszka Staniszewski;Shi Xian Deng;Lucia Privitera

  • Amyloid-β Peptide Inhibits Activation of the Nitric Oxide/cGMP/cAMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein Pathway during Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity

    Daniela Puzzo;Ottavio Vitolo;Fabrizio Trinchese;Joel P. Jacob

  • Extracellular Tau Oligomers Produce An Immediate Impairment of LTP and Memory.

    M. Fá;D. Puzzo;D. Puzzo;R. Piacentini;Agnieszka Staniszewski

  • Role of Amyloid-β and Tau Proteins in Alzheimer’s Disease: Confuting the Amyloid Cascade

    Walter Gulisano;Daniele Maugeri;Marian A Baltrons;Marian A Baltrons;Mauro Fà

  • Behavioral assays with mouse models of Alzheimer's disease: practical considerations and guidelines.

    Daniela Puzzo;Linda Lee;Agostino Palmeri;Giorgio Calabrese

  • Rodent models for Alzheimer’s disease drug discovery

    Daniela Puzzo;Walter Gulisano;Agostino Palmeri;Ottavio Arancio

  • A GluR1-cGKII Interaction Regulates AMPA Receptor Trafficking

    Yafell Serulle;Shuang Zhang;Ipe Ninan;Daniela Puzzo

  • LTP and memory impairment caused by extracellular Aβ and Tau oligomers is APP-dependent.

    Daniela Puzzo;Roberto Piacentini;Mauro Fá;Walter Gulisano

  • Amyloid-β peptide: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde?

    Daniela Puzzo;Ottavio Arancio

  • Synaptic Therapy in Alzheimer’s Disease: A CREB-centric Approach

    Andrew Franklin Teich;Russell E. Nicholls;Daniela Puzzo;Jole Fiorito

  • THE KEYSTONE OF ALZHEIMER PATHOGENESIS MIGHT BE SOUGHT IN Aβ PHYSIOLOGY

    Daniela Puzzo;Walter Gulisano;Ottavio Arancio;Agostino Palmeri

  • Intracellular accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) protein plays a major role in Aβ-induced alterations of glutamatergic synaptic transmission and plasticity.

    Cristian Ripoli;Sara Cocco;Domenica Donatella Li Puma;Roberto Piacentini

  • Hormetic effect of amyloid-beta peptide in synaptic plasticity and memory

    Daniela Puzzo;Lucia Privitera;Agostino Palmeri

  • Improved long-term memory via enhancing cGMP-PKG signaling requires cAMP-PKA signaling.

    Eva Bollen;Daniela Puzzo;Kris Rutten;Lucia Privitera

  • A key role for TGF-β1 in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory.

    Filippo Caraci;Walter Gulisano;Chiara A. Guida;Agata A. R. Impellizzeri

  • Role of phosphodiesterase 5 in synaptic plasticity and memory.

    Daniela Puzzo;Salvatore Sapienza;Ottavio Arancio;Agostino Palmeri

  • Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on apoptosis and beta amyloid load in aged mice

    Daniela Puzzo;Carla Loreto;Salvatore Giunta;Giuseppe Musumeci

Frequent Co-Authors

Ottavio Arancio
Ottavio Arancio Columbia University
Claudio Grassi
Claudio Grassi Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Filippo Drago
Filippo Drago University of Catania
Luciano D'Adamio
Luciano D'Adamio Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Fiorenzo Conti
Fiorenzo Conti Marche Polytechnic University
Paul E. Fraser
Paul E. Fraser University of Toronto
Edward B. Ziff
Edward B. Ziff New York University
Marcello Melone
Marcello Melone Marche Polytechnic University
Claudio Bucolo
Claudio Bucolo University of Catania
Maria Vincenza Catania
Maria Vincenza Catania National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience complements many fields in psychology, mental health, and life sciences. If you're considering alternative or related programs, exploring psyd programs online can be an excellent choice. These programs prepare you for clinical psychology careers and provide a strong foundation in research.

For those interested in tackling family and relationship dynamics, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs offer a fast-track route toward licensure and practice, making them attractive for students eager to enter the workforce.

Time-conscious students may be drawn to accelerated degree programs that let you earn your degree quicker while maintaining rigorous academic standards. These options enable greater flexibility for career changes or early entry into graduate studies.

Considering future earnings and job stability? Explore the best degrees in the world for insight into high-demand fields. Pairing neuroscience expertise with one of these top degrees can unlock diverse, rewarding career opportunities in both healthcare and tech sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Daniela Puzzo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles