World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Victor F. Froelicher

Victor F. Froelicher

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6922 6511 3649 3384 626 54940

Victor F. Froelicher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Victor F. Froelicher between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Victor F. Froelicher published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2006. 19 of the 655 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2006. 1972: 3 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 11 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 23 publications 1981: 10 publications 1982: 12 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 20 publications 1989: 25 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 19 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1972 2025

655 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Victor F. Froelicher: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 3
1973 4
1974 6
1975 3
1976 1
1977 11
1978 3
1979 8
1980 23
1981 10
1982 12
1983 10
1984 13
1985 11
1986 8
1987 12
1988 20
1989 25
1990 23
1991 19
1992 11
1993 15
1994 14
1995 9
1996 6
1997 5
1998 6
1999 4
2000 12
2001 19
2002 20
2003 14
2004 14
2005 17
2006 32
2007 25
2008 17
2009 16
2010 14
2011 16
2012 14
2013 29
2014 11
2015 22
2016 4
2017 10
2018 8
2019 9
2020 4
2021 6
2022 5
2023 3
2024 11
2025 8
Total 655
Download as CSV

Victor F. Froelicher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor F. Froelicher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 626 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 626
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Victor F. Froelicher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor F. Froelicher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Victor F. Froelicher is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the broad field of Medicine, focusing extensively on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The subfields in which they have contributed include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

The scientist's main topics of work cover areas related to cardiovascular health and sports medicine. These topics include:

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Victor F. Froelicher has published numerous papers, with recent publications highlighting several aspects of cardiac health and diagnostics. Some of the recent papers include:

  • "Serial 7-Day Electrocardiogram Patch Screening for AF in High-Risk Older Women by the CHARGE-AF Score," 2022, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • "Should ECG criteria for Low QRS voltage (LQRSV) be specific for Sex?" 2024, American Heart Journal
  • "Impact of the distance from the chest wall to the heart on surface ECG voltage in athletes," 2020, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
  • "Guide to the Female Student Athlete ECG: A Comprehensive Study of 3466 Young, Racially Diverse Athletes," 2022, The American Journal of Medicine
  • "Prevalence of frequent premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in older women screened for atrial fibrillation in the Women's Health Initiative," 2024, Heart Rhythm

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Matthew T. Wheeler
  • David Hadley
  • Jeffrey W. Christle
  • Samuel Montalvo
  • Marco Pérez

Victor F. Froelicher has published works predominantly in several venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • The American Journal of Medicine
  • Heart Rhythm
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Best Publications

  • Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.

    Jonathan Myers;Manish Prakash;Victor Froelicher;Dat Do

  • ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Exercise Standards for Testing and Training A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

    Gerald F. Fletcher;Gary J. Balady;Ezra A. Amsterdam;Bernard Chaitman

  • Exercise Standards for Testing and Training A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Gerald F. Fletcher;Philip A. Ades;Paul Kligfield;Ross A. Arena

  • Statement on Exercise: Benefits and Recommendations for Physical Activity Programs for All Americans A Statement for Health Professionals by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association

    Gerald F. Fletcher;Steven N. Blair;James Blumenthal;Carl Caspersen

  • ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker

  • ACC/AHA guidelines for exercise testing : Executive summary : A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;John W. Beasley;Faafp

  • Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis.

    R Gianrossi;R Detrano;D Mulvihill;K Lehmann

  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease

    Robert A O’Rourke;Bruce H Brundage;Victor F Froelicher;Philip Greenland

  • Fitness versus physical activity patterns in predicting mortality in men

    Jonathan Myers;Amir Kaykha;Sheela George;Joshua Abella

  • Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group.

    G F Fletcher;G Balady;V F Froelicher;L H Hartley

  • Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the ‘Seattle Criteria’

    Jonathan A Drezner;Michael John Ackerman;Jeffrey Anderson;Euan Ashley

  • Exercise standards. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association.

    G F Fletcher;V F Froelicher;L H Hartley;W L Haskell

  • Comparison of the ramp versus standard exercise protocols.

    Jonathan Myers;Nancy Buchanan;Doug Walsh;Mark Kraemer

  • International application of a new probability algorithm for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

    Robert Detrano;Andras Janosi;Walter Steinbrunn;Matthias Pfisterer

  • Heart rate recovery: validation and methodologic issues.

    Katerina Shetler;Rachel Marcus;Victor F Froelicher;Shefali Vora

  • International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes

    Sanjay Sharma;Jonathan A. Drezner;Aaron Baggish;Michael Papadakis

  • Exercise and the Heart

    Victor F. M.D. Froelicher;Jonathan Myers

  • Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing

    J. Myers;M. Prakash;V. Froelicher;D. Do

  • Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Gary J. Balady;J. Timothy Bricker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Euan A. Ashley
Euan A. Ashley Stanford University
Robert Detrano
Robert Detrano University of California, Irvine
Paul A. Heidenreich
Paul A. Heidenreich Stanford University
Paul J. Wang
Paul J. Wang Stanford University
Antonio Pelliccia
Antonio Pelliccia Italian National Olympic Committee
John Ross
John Ross University of California, San Diego
Sanjay Sharma
Sanjay Sharma St George's, University of London
William F. Fearon
William F. Fearon Stanford University
Ezra A. Amsterdam
Ezra A. Amsterdam University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have a growing number of online degree and career pathway options beyond the traditional MD track. For those interested in patient wellness and disease prevention, pursuing a nutrition degree online offers the flexibility to build expertise in dietetics and nutrition therapy.

Healthcare leadership roles are also evolving. Learning how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is key for students considering careers in hospital management or healthcare policy. Online Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) degrees are now widely available, making career advancement more accessible.

Registered nurses seeking career growth can now take advantage of rn to bsn without clinicals programs. These online pathways let working nurses complete their bachelor’s degrees entirely online with no in-person clinical requirements.

For those aiming for the highest level of nursing practice, dnp online programs offer an accelerated way to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice. As healthcare shifts to online learning, these flexible degrees help students balance their education with professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Victor F. Froelicher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles