World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
57564
World Ranking
5457
National Ranking
2938

Michael S. Lauer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Lauer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 454 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael S. Lauer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Lauer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael S. Lauer is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable concentration in public health, environmental and occupational health, statistics, probability and uncertainty, economics and econometrics, gender studies, and infectious diseases.

Their work spans multiple main topics, including:

  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Scientometrics and Bibliometrics Research
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Their recent publications include:

  • Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding, 2021, published in eLife
  • Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health, 2021, published in eLife
  • Early administration of COVID-19 convalescent plasma with high titer antibody content by live viral neutralization assay is associated with modest clinical efficacy, 2022, published in American Journal of Hematology
  • Biomedical Research COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs, 2021, published in NAM Perspectives
  • National Institutes of Health social and behavioral research in response to the SARS-CoV2 Pandemic, 2020, published in Translational Behavioral Medicine

Michael S. Lauer has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Deepshikha Roychowdhury
  • Joy Wang
  • Jamie Mihoko Doyle
  • William T. Riley
  • Muin J. Khoury

Their publications are commonly found in several venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Science
  • UNC Libraries
  • American Journal of Hematology

Best Publications

  • Defining and Setting National Goals for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Reduction The American Heart Association’s Strategic Impact Goal Through 2020 and Beyond

    Donald M. Lloyd-Jones;Yuling Hong;Darwin Labarthe;Dariush Mozaffarian

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Philip Greenland;Joseph S. Alpert;George A. Beller;Emelia J. Benjamin

  • Heart Rate Recovery Immediately After Exercise as a Predictor of Mortality

    C R Cole;E H Blackstone;F J Pashkow;C E Snader

  • Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation

    Ronnier J. Aviles;David O. Martin;Carolyn Apperson-Hansen;Penny L. Houghtaling

  • Random survival forests

    Hemant Ishwaran;Udaya B. Kogalur;Eugene H. Blackstone;Michael S. Lauer

  • 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults

    Philip Greenland;Joseph S. Alpert;George A. Beller;Emelia J. Benjamin

  • Social Determinants of Risk and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Edward P. Havranek;Mahasin S. Mujahid;Donald A. Barr;Irene V. Blair

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in Collaboration With the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation

    Arthur S. Leon;Barry A. Franklin;Fernando Costa;Gary J. Balady

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Heart Rate Recovery and Treadmill Exercise Score as Predictors of Mortality in Patients Referred for Exercise ECG

    Erna Obenza Nishime;Christopher R. Cole;Eugene H. Blackstone;Fredric J. Pashkow

  • The Impact of Obesity on Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry: The Framingham Heart Study

    Michael S. Lauer;Keaven M. Anderson;William B. Kannel;Daniel Levy

  • Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort.

    Christopher R. Cole;JoAnne M. Foody;Eugene H. Blackstone;Michael S. Lauer

  • Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality.

    Michael S. Lauer;Gary S. Francis;Peter M. Okin;Fredric J. Pashkow

  • Impaired Heart Rate Response to Graded Exercise Prognostic Implications of Chronotropic Incompetence in the Framingham Heart Study

    Michael S. Lauer;Peter M. Okin;Martin G. Larson;Jane C. Evans

  • American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention.

    Jeffrey J. Goldberger;Michael E. Cain;Stefan H. Hohnloser;Alan H. Kadish

  • The Randomized Registry Trial — The Next Disruptive Technology in Clinical Research?

    Michael S. Lauer;Ralph B. D'Agostino

  • Cause of death in clinical research: Time for a reassessment?

    Michael S Lauer;Eugene H Blackstone;James B Young;Eric J Topol

  • Blood Pressure Response During Treadmill Testing as a Risk Factor for New-Onset Hypertension The Framingham Heart Study

    Jagmeet P. Singh;Martin G. Larson;Teri A. Manolio;Christopher J. O’Donnell

  • Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy.

    Stefan C. Bertog;Senthil K. Thambidorai;Kapil Parakh;Paul Schoenhagen

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic
Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Eric J. Topol
Eric J. Topol Scripps Research Institute
Daniel Levy
Daniel Levy National Institutes of Health
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Philip Greenland
Philip Greenland Northwestern University
James B. Young
James B. Young Cleveland Clinic
Gary S. Francis
Gary S. Francis University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in a medical career but considering flexible learning options? Many students are exploring online degrees in nursing and healthcare as accessible alternatives to traditional medicine programs. These pathways often offer lower tuition, flexible schedules, and quicker routes to licensure.

For those aiming to become advanced practice providers, exploring the cheapest np school options online can open the door to a rewarding nurse practitioner career. Entry-level nurses may wish to start by researching the cheapest bsn programs online, providing an affordable way to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Already an RN? Transitioning your credentials through the cheapest rn to bsn online programs can advance your opportunities in clinical settings. Those seeking academic or leadership positions might also consider phd in nursing online programs—a flexible solution for working professionals to attain the highest qualifications in nursing.

These online degrees not only provide flexible entry points into healthcare, but also offer diverse career growth for those passionate about the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Lauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles