World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1301 1153 249 223 145 127006

Norman Fairclough publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Norman Fairclough between 1971 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Norman Fairclough published across 53 years, from 1971 to 2023, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 2 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1971 2023

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Norman Fairclough: publications per year, 1971 to 2023
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 7
2000 9
2001 6
2002 4
2003 6
2004 9
2005 6
2006 8
2007 9
2008 6
2009 6
2010 5
2011 1
2012 4
2013 17
2014 9
2015 2
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 2
2020 3
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
Total 150
Download as CSV

Norman Fairclough publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman Fairclough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 145
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Norman Fairclough D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman Fairclough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Norman Fairclough is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom and is active in the Arts and Humanities field, specializing in discourse analysis and critical theory. Their research intersects several subfields, including Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, as well as Philosophy.

The focal areas of Fairclough's work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, Cultural and Political Discourse Analysis, and Marxism and Critical Theory.

Their recent publications reflect these interests. Notable papers include:

  • "Critical discourse analysis as 'dialectical reasoning': from normative critique towards action, by way of explanation" (2020), published in Mots
  • Contents (2021), published by Edinburgh University Press eBooks

Fairclough has also contributed to book publications with Edinburgh University Press. A significant work published there is "Discourse in Late Modernity" (2021), which has accrued numerous citations.

Frequent collaborators include Lilie Chouliaraki, with whom Fairclough has co-authored multiple works, and Ronny Scholz. The majority of their joint research appears in the same disciplinary areas related to discourse and communication studies.

The main publication venues for Fairclough's research are Mots and Edinburgh University Press eBooks, indicating an engagement with both journal and book formats.

Best Publications

  • Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language

    Norman Fairclough

  • Discourse and social change

    Norman Fairclough

  • Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research

    Norman Fairclough

  • Language and Power

    Norman Fairclough

  • Discourse in late modernity : rethinking critical discourse analysis

    Lilie Chouliaraki;Norman Fairclough

  • A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures

    Unknown

  • New Labour, new language?

    Norman Fairclough

  • Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities

    Norman Fairclough

  • Critical Language Awareness

    Norman Fairclough

  • Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis:

    Norman Fairclough

  • Language and Globalization

    Norman Fairclough

  • Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research.

    Norman Fairclough

  • Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students

    Isabela Fairclough;Norman Fairclough

  • Language and power (2nd ed.)

    Norman Fairclough

  • Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language

    Maureen Weissenrieder;Norman Fairclough

  • A dialectical–relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research

    Norman Fairclough

  • Peripheral Vision Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism

    Norman Fairclough

  • The discourse of New Labour : critical discourse analysis.

    Norman Fairclough

  • Análisis crítico del discurso

    Ruth Wodak;Norman Fairclough

  • Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies

    Norman Fairclough

  • Discourse in Late Modernity

    Norman Fairclough;L. Chouliaraki

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth Wodak
Ruth Wodak Lancaster University
Bob Jessop
Bob Jessop Lancaster University
Andrew Sayer
Andrew Sayer Lancaster University
Jay L. Lemke
Jay L. Lemke City University of New York
Jonathan Potter
Jonathan Potter Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Anna Mauranen
Anna Mauranen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA has never been more accessible, thanks to a variety of flexible online programs. For those interested in advanced clinical and research roles, a psyd program can prepare you for a career in psychology practice or academia.

If your focus is on helping couples and families, consider accredited mft online programs, which specialize in marriage and family therapy. These programs are designed to equip you with the critical skills needed for licensure and professional practice.

For a broader approach, students seeking value and flexibility might choose the online masters in psychology, which opens doors to roles in mental health, research, and counseling.

Professionals looking to accelerate their advancement in educational settings should consider the fastest edd program online. This efficient option lets you earn a terminal degree without extended time commitments, preparing you for leadership positions in education.

Each pathway offers unique benefits—choose the best fit for your goals and start shaping your future in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Norman Fairclough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles