World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6054
World Ranking
10728
National Ranking
425

Joanna McGrenere publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna McGrenere sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joanna McGrenere D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanna McGrenere sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joanna McGrenere is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their body of work primarily spans the fields of computer science and social sciences, with a focus on interdisciplinary areas such as human-computer interaction and applied psychology.

Their recent research includes several papers published between 2020 and 2024, covering topics related to mental health, digital interventions, and design in computing systems. Notable publications include:

  • Exploring Design Opportunities for Supporting Mental Wellbeing Among East Asian University Students in Canada, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Feeling Stressed and Unproductive? A Field Evaluation of a Therapy-Inspired Digital Intervention for Knowledge Workers, 2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Gender Differences in Graphic Design Q&As, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Co-designing Mental Health Technologies with International University Students in Canada, 2023, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Tailored Self-Management App to Support Older Adults With Cancer and Multimorbidity: Development and Usability Testing, 2024, JMIR Aging

Frequent publication venues for McGrenere's work include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (8 publications)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (3 publications)
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2 publications)
  • JMIR Aging (1 publication)
  • Studies in health technology and informatics (1 publication)

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Sang-Wha Sien, Jiamin Dai, Kevin Chow, Thomas Fritz, and Francis Kobekyaa. These collaborations span multiple projects, primarily in the areas of digital mental health and technology interaction.

McGrenere's research addresses a range of subfields including human-computer interaction, sociology and political science, applied psychology, demography, and communication. The scientist's main focus topics can be summarized as:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

This combination of topics reflects the intersection of technology, user behavior, and health, illustrating an engagement with both practical application and theoretical frameworks in these areas.

Best Publications

  • Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep.

    Joanna McGrenere;Wayne Ho

  • A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus

    Leah Findlater;Joanna McGrenere

  • An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software

    Joanna McGrenere;Ronald M. Baecker;Kellogg S. Booth

  • Creating Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities

    Narges Ashtari;Andrea Bunt;Joanna McGrenere;Michael Nebeling

  • Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces

    Leah Findlater;Joanna McGrenere

  • The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia

    Karyn Moffatt;Joanna McGrenere;Barbara Purves;Maria Klawe

  • How Older Adults Learn to Use Mobile Devices: Survey and Field Investigations

    Rock Leung;Charlotte Tang;Shathel Haddad;Joanna Mcgrenere

  • Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance

    Leah Findlater;Karyn Moffatt;Joanna McGrenere;Jessica Dawson

  • Turn-Taking Protocols for Mouse-Driven Collaborative Environments

    Kori Inkpen;Joanna McGrenere;Kellogg S. Booth;Maria Klawe

  • Supporting interface customization using a mixed-initiative approach

    Andrea Bunt;Cristina Conati;Joanna McGrenere

  • Designing haptic icons to support collaborative turn-taking

    Andrew Chan;Karon MacLean;Joanna McGrenere

  • Learning and identifying haptic icons under workload

    A. Chan;K. MacLean;J. McGrenere

  • Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons

    Rock Leung;Joanna McGrenere;Peter Graf

  • Are We All In the Same "Bloat"?

    Joanna McGrenere;Gale Moore

  • Beyond performance: Feature awareness in personalized interfaces

    Leah Findlater;Joanna McGrenere

  • What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system

    Andrea Bunt;Cristina Conati;Joanna McGrenere

  • Technology Adoption and Learning Preferences for Older Adults:: Evolving Perceptions, Ongoing Challenges, and Emerging Design Opportunities

    Carolyn Pang;Zhiqin Collin Wang;Joanna McGrenere;Rock Leung

  • An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview

    Dmitry Nekrasovski;Adam Bodnar;Joanna McGrenere;François Guimbretière

  • Matching attentional draw with utility in interruption

    Jennifer Gluck;Andrea Bunt;Joanna McGrenere

  • Multi-Layered Interfaces to Improve Older Adults’ Initial Learnability of Mobile Applications

    Rock Leung;Leah Findlater;Joanna McGrenere;Peter Graf

  • The effect of turn-taking protocols on children's learning in mouse-driven collaborative environments

    Kori Inkpen;Joanna McGrenere;Kellogg S. Booth;Maria Klawe

Frequent Co-Authors

Kellogg S. Booth
Kellogg S. Booth University of British Columbia
Leah Findlater
Leah Findlater University of Washington
Wendy E. Mackay
Wendy E. Mackay University of Paris-Saclay
Maria Klawe
Maria Klawe Harvey Mudd College
Ronald M. Baecker
Ronald M. Baecker University of Toronto
Karon E. MacLean
Karon E. MacLean University of British Columbia
Cristina Conati
Cristina Conati University of British Columbia
Tamara Munzner
Tamara Munzner University of British Columbia
Kori Inkpen
Kori Inkpen Microsoft (United States)
Peter Graf
Peter Graf University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s helpful to know about related online degrees and how they can broaden your career options. Many programs now offer flexibility through online learning, including the option to earn a 1 year computer science degree online. These accelerated degrees are ideal for students looking to enter the tech workforce quickly.

In addition to computer science, engineering fields provide a strong foundation for high-demand careers. For those interested in sustainability and environmental solutions, accredited environmental engineering schools online offer affordable and flexible ways to gain in-depth knowledge.

Mechanical engineering remains one of the most versatile branches of engineering. Prospective students can compare mechanical engineering cost of education to find programs that fit their budget and career goals.

Finally, for those passionate about the foundations of science and technology, earning an online bachelor's degree in physics opens doors to research, teaching, and emerging fields like data science.

Best Scientists Citing Joanna McGrenere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles